Most Popular Topics
Collapse
Anyone keeping an ear on Tesla today?
Collapse
X
-
-
safe to assume that the price per KW for utilities is lower than the $300/KW they're charging for the residential systems At $300/KW for utility-scale batteries, there's studies for California and Texas that show batteries are a cheaper alternative to building gas-fired peakers.
Must tweeted $250/kWh today:
Comment
-
10Kw is barely enough for a very small, efficient off grid house, I generally burn 7Kwh in the winter and 12Kwh (adding the water pumps) in the summer. So the 10Kw may just hold me overnight, but when Joe suburb homeowner has a grid failure and his air conditioned spa shuts off 3 hours later, he's not going to be happy with his Tesla battery
Multiple batteries may be installed together for homes with greater energy need, up to 90 kWh total for the 10 kWh battery and 63 kWh total for the 7 kWh battery.Comment
-
The Powerwall can be combined as per:
http://www.teslamotors.com/powerwallMSEE, PEComment
-
Comment
-
I am typing slowly for you to understand. Any battery can be cascaded. That is not a selling point, just blather.MSEE, PEComment
-
Tesla also announced utility-scale battery systems, so yes, apparently someone did think of this.
They didn't give pricing for the utility systems, but it's probably safe to assume that the price per KW for utilities is lower than the $300/KW they're charging for the residential systems.
At $300/KW for utility-scale batteries, there's studies for California and Texas that show batteries are a cheaper alternative to building gas-fired peakers.
A fair comparison needs to include the cost of making the power to put in the battery, as well and the efficiency loss of moving electricity it in and out.
There are plenty of places where cheap batteries create value. Especially if the cost of adding carbon to the environment is included, and the true cost of nuclear is calculated. All comparisons should be inclusive, not just the ones supporting ones preference.Comment
-
Peakers make power. Batteries transfer power across time.
A fair comparison needs to include the cost of making the power to put in the battery, as well and the efficiency loss of moving electricity it in and out.
There are plenty of places where cheap batteries create value. Especially if the cost of adding carbon to the environment is included, and the true cost of nuclear is calculated. All comparisons should be inclusive, not just the ones supporting ones preference.
The studies I was referencing were looking at installing grid-scale battery banks instead of building peakers. The batteries would charge from baseload generation (or excess intermittent renewables), and discharge when peak power is required.
This lets you replace an absurdly-expensive-per-kWh gas peaker with a merely-expensive-per-kWh battery plus cheap-per-kWh base generation.
There's another thread about these studies here: http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...-a-power-plant16x TenK 410W modules + 14x TenK 500W invertersComment
-
You are long on chatter and short on know it seems.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
Utilities also need load smoothing to accommodate the wind and other RE being fed into the grid.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
Comment
-
Sadly, now that the installed price (only avaib w/install) for the power wall is over $7K, it's going to be a lot less appealing until the rolling blackouts start happening.Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
|| Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
|| VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A
solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-ListerComment
-
That is exactly what the POCO's are waiting for and planning on. That is when the goberment will pull their head out of their Arse and allow POCO's to start building power plants again by removing all the litigation expense, streamline permitting process, and relaxed environmental regulations to make it affordable and profitable. Right now utilities are just waiting for the shoe to drop. They have all the time in the world on their side.MSEE, PEComment
-
I used to participate on The Oil Drum as a skeptic. Not that I don't believe peak oil will some day be an historical fact. Just that the Peakers vastly underestimated the ability to change. And that the drama the Peakers sincerely expected was unlikely.
It's ironic that the members of the big oil clan have the same lack of understanding. Or perhaps it is not ironic, but simply an aspect of human nature to ignore the obvious when invested in a contrary approach.
The developed world is switching to a mostly renewable energy infrastructure. It will work fine, and will be affordable. And best of all, it will not include flooded lead acid batteries! That's the part I'm most excited about.Comment
-
I used to participate on The Oil Drum as a skeptic. Not that I don't believe peak oil will some day be an historical fact. Just that the Peakers vastly underestimated the ability to change. And that the drama the Peakers sincerely expected was unlikely.
It's ironic that the members of the big oil clan have the same lack of understanding. Or perhaps it is not ironic, but simply an aspect of human nature to ignore the obvious when invested in a contrary approach.
The developed world is switching to a mostly renewable energy infrastructure. It will work fine, and will be affordable. And best of all, it will not include flooded lead acid batteries! That's the part I'm most excited about.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
Comment