Tesla announces "Powerwall" batteries

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • russ
    replied
    Originally posted by Ian S
    In Arizona, Palo Verde dwarfs all the others and even some of the others have ownership stakes by Cali utilities. I've admitted no failure of Cali energy policy. Where does it say that a utility can't own out-of-state power plants? If it makes financial sense why not? You just hate California and salivate at the thought of its residents hurting. Well, California has come back nicely while Texas takes it turn in the can. Maybe Texas should emulate it oil baron cousins up in Alberta, Canada which just threw out the long-ruling Conservatives and replaced them with the socialist New Democrats!
    Ian - You should move in with governor Moonbeam - your line is as good as his!

    Buying power out of state is a positive thing? Only as long as the other states don't mind.

    CA wants to import water from other places - that ain't gonna happen either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ian S
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunking
    There are a lot more than one generating station feeding CA power.

    You just admitted CA energy policy has failed because they have to invest in out of state operations.
    In Arizona, Palo Verde dwarfs all the others and even some of the others have ownership stakes by Cali utilities. I've admitted no failure of Cali energy policy. Where does it say that a utility can't own out-of-state power plants? If it makes financial sense why not? You just hate California and salivate at the thought of its residents hurting. Well, California has come back nicely while Texas takes it turn in the can. Maybe Texas should emulate it oil baron cousins up in Alberta, Canada which just threw out the long-ruling Conservatives and replaced them with the socialist New Democrats!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunking
    replied
    Originally posted by Ian S
    I've told you before but I guess you need continual reminders: Arizona doesn't own any power plants so they can't cut anyone off. The Palo Verde nuclear plant is co-owned by a number of utilities including several from California. So no one is in a position to cut anyone off.
    There are a lot more than one generating station feeding CA power.

    You just admitted CA energy policy has failed because they have to invest in out of state operations.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ian S
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle
    Do you mean the State of Arizona doesn't own power plants? That is more than likely true but that doesn't mean a privately owned power plant can't cut power to secondary "customers" out of state.

    If a situation happens (I can think of at least 6) a power plant can and will shed low priority customers to keep the lights on for high priority ones. Georgia did it to Florida even with contracts in place stating they had to sell us power. They just ran low and turned ours off.
    I suspect the difference is that Florida utilities had no ownership of the power plant in Georgia. Here it's different due to the multiple owners of Palo Verde which is the only ongoing plant of significant note here in Arizona. Palo Verde is not going to cut off its owners including its Californian owners. If push comes to shove, the electricity would likely go to the highest bidder and in that event I'd bet on the folks in Cali over the rubes here in Arizona! All Cali would have to do is block I8 to all Arizona residents in July and August.

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by Ian S
    I've told you before but I guess you need continual reminders: Arizona doesn't own any power plants so they can't cut anyone off. The Palo Verde nuclear plant is co-owned by a number of utilities including several from California. So no one is in a position to cut anyone off.
    Do you mean the State of Arizona doesn't own power plants? That is more than likely true but that doesn't mean a privately owned power plant can't cut power to secondary "customers" out of state.

    If a situation happens (I can think of at least 6) a power plant can and will shed low priority customers to keep the lights on for high priority ones. Georgia did it to Florida even with contracts in place stating they had to sell us power. They just ran low and turned ours off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ian S
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunking
    Sooner or later AZ, NV, and OR are going to run out of excess capacity and cut you off.
    I've told you before but I guess you need continual reminders: Arizona doesn't own any power plants so they can't cut anyone off. The Palo Verde nuclear plant is co-owned by a number of utilities including several from California. So no one is in a position to cut anyone off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunking
    replied
    Originally posted by Sundetective
    Mr. Musk may also smell the 'California Medical Plants'.
    At up to 1000 Watts per Grow Light or more
    the electric meters (or home RE) is smokin.
    Old Bill is not jokin

    The value per Light in the right hands is Legendary and many of them get
    3 or more chances (crops) to win every year.

    Now many people feel that between 2016 - 2018
    every Tom, Dick, Jack and Jill
    of age in the State is going to get the nod
    from the State Government that they too ... can Legally get their piece now.

    Then watch those electric meters smoke.

    Some people are giving themselves 'good position' for this feast as we speaks.
    The devils.

    Bill Blake
    Yeah well me thinks come the beginning of 2017 the Ganja Party is over. The IRS is going to come in and lower the Tax Boom on the dealers. None of them have a Federal Tax Stamp for manufacture and distributing Ganja and have not paid one penny of Federal Taxes on all that Ganja. Same as booze, you gotta have a Federal Tax Stamp and pay Federal Taxes on every drop you produce and sell. Ask any Moon Shiner

    Leave a comment:


  • Sundetective
    replied
    Mr. Musk

    Mr. Musk may also smell the 'California Medical Plants'.
    At up to 1000 Watts per Grow Light or more
    the electric meters (or home RE) is smokin.
    Old Bill is not jokin

    The value per Light in the right hands is Legendary and many of them get
    3 or more chances (crops) to win every year.

    Now many people feel that between 2016 - 2018
    every Tom, Dick, Jack and Jill
    of age in the State is going to get the nod
    from the State Government that they too ... can Legally get their piece now.

    Then watch those electric meters smoke.

    Some people are giving themselves 'good position' for this feast as we speaks.
    The devils.

    Bill Blake

    Originally posted by Sunking
    Musk is a Smart Man. He knows CA energy policy has failed and is trying to capitalize from it. Plain and simple he smells blood. Just like when a Hurricane hits an area. Lots of folks with generators, toilet paper, water, ect.. waiting in a warehouse for the next storm, then scalp the victims who are happy to pay up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunking
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle
    Musk is gambling that he will make enough money with his battery strategy to get the price down below the cost of existing power generation such as peakers.
    Musk is a Smart Man. He knows CA energy policy has failed and is trying to capitalize from it via SGIP and Corporate Welfare. Plain and simple he smells blood. Just like when a Hurricane hits an area. Lots of folks with generators, toilet paper, water, ect.. waiting in a warehouse for the next storm, then scalp the victims who are happy to pay up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunking
    replied
    Originally posted by DanKegel
    Last time California had rolling blackouts, it was partly because wholesale prices were unregulated, but retail prices remained capped, so utilities didn't have revenue to buy enough power ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Califor...tricity_crisis ).
    Wonder if we learned anything from that.
    Who mentioned anything about Black outs from 20 years ago? That is a Straw Man Argument. 20 years ago California imported 10% of electric energy. Today 30% and climbing from failed energy policy. Sooner or later AZ, NV, and OR are going to run out of excess capacity and cut you off. Those are just the facts of life you want to ignore and censor.

    You Ian and a few others have fallen into a trap you cannot get out of. Musk motivation with his home battery is to tap more tax dollars via SGIP. That is Corporate Welfare ripping off the public. You, Ian and others BOLDY advocate support it. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by donald
    None of the blackouts discussed were caused by renewable policy. Especially California's problems caused by the republican heros at Enron.

    If batteries really are near the value of gas peakers, then Musk is a smart man.
    Ok so none of the past blackouts were caused by RE. So does that mean there won't be any blackouts in the future?

    That is like saying since I have live in Florida for almost 30 years and have not gotten a direct hit from a hurricane it will never happen.

    The more RE is introduced and relied upon the better chance of some places will eventually lose power. It is just math and gambling.

    Musk is gambling that he will make enough money with his battery strategy to get the price down below the cost of existing power generation such as peakers.

    Leave a comment:


  • russ
    replied
    Originally posted by donald
    None of the blackouts discussed were caused by renewable policy. Especially California's problems caused by the republican heros at Enron.

    If batteries really are near the value of gas peakers, then Musk is a smart man.
    You post tripe like this and then accuse me of bullying you? BS - you just chatter of what you have zero idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • donald
    replied
    None of the blackouts discussed were caused by renewable policy. Especially California's problems caused by the republican heros at Enron.

    If batteries really are near the value of gas peakers, then Musk is a smart man.

    Leave a comment:


  • DanKegel
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunking
    That does not solve the capacity problem and imports. As long as neighboring states fill the shortages, life goes on as usual of getting further behind until it hits breaking point with rolling blackouts. Sooner or later the neighboring states are going to run out of excess capacity and cut California off and limit supply. At that point California has no where to go but Dark.
    Last time California had rolling blackouts, it was partly because wholesale prices were unregulated, but retail prices remained capped, so utilities didn't have revenue to buy enough power ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Califor...tricity_crisis ).
    Wonder if we learned anything from that.

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunking
    That does not solve the capacity problem and imports. As long as neighboring states fill the shortages, life goes on as usual of getting further behind until it hits breaking point with rolling blackouts. Sooner or later the neighboring states are going to run out of excess capacity and cut California off and limit supply. At that point California has no where to go but Dark.
    Yep. Florida had rolling blackouts for Christmas back in 1989 or 1990. That was due to our local POCO generators being down and going through maintenance and the power coming from Georgia was cut off due to extreme low temperatures so they needed more themselves.

    It was fun trying to cook a turkey when the power went out for 15 minutes every hour for most of the day.

    Leave a comment:

Working...