5 years ago, when I decided to install a solar rooftop system, that decision was easily made, given the fact that San Diego Gas & Electric Company had the highest rates in the Country. Nothing has changed. The cost of electricity for peak consumption during the summer months for TOU-EV2 was $0.68/kWh. This year that cost is increasing to $0.83/kWh. That represents a 20% increase in the cost. Not as bad as natural gas, with what is tantamount to a 100% increase since last January ($2.36/therm [1/2022] to $5.11/therm [1/2023]}.
Try our solar cost and savings calculator
Solar Makes Sense With Highest Electric Rates in the Country (SDG&E)
Collapse
X
-
-
I live in a country with probably the lowest electricity rates in the world and yet i decided to install my solar. Our first 600 kWh is 0.01 cts, 601-2000 is 0.08 cts, 2001-4000 is 0.10 cents and 4001 upwards is 0.12 cts. Its all heavily subsidised. It takes 12 yrs to recover my system at these rates. However, all the energy we use isnt subsidised by nature. All the CO2 produced by each kWh generated contributes to our childrens' suffering going forward. My view is we shouldnt be looking at all this simply from a selfish monetary point of view but from our ability to make a difference in our own way moving away from burning fossils. Its easy to make that decision when energy hurts our pockets and we view it just to save money but its a lot harder to invest in a better future for our kids. -
While I'm not sold on the argument, perhaps your utility provider is partially responsible for the failure of providing an incentive for customers to move over to solar, by providing energy costs that are simply too low, failing to justify a reason for its customers to move over to installing solar systems and exercise behaviors that focus on conservation.Comment
-
Unfortunately until all countries decide to stop using fossil fuel (which IMO will never happen) a few home solar installs will not help my grandchildren. But how I spend my money will help them.so until I can financially justify installing panels I will just sit by.I live in a country with probably the lowest electricity rates in the world and yet i decided to install my solar. Our first 600 kWh is 0.01 cts, 601-2000 is 0.08 cts, 2001-4000 is 0.10 cents and 4001 upwards is 0.12 cts. Its all heavily subsidised. It takes 12 yrs to recover my system at these rates. However, all the energy we use isnt subsidised by nature. All the CO2 produced by each kWh generated contributes to our childrens' suffering going forward. My view is we shouldnt be looking at all this simply from a selfish monetary point of view but from our ability to make a difference in our own way moving away from burning fossils. Its easy to make that decision when energy hurts our pockets and we view it just to save money but its a lot harder to invest in a better future for our kids.Comment
-
Given that Brunei (where Davidcheck lives) derives most of its revenue from oil and natural gas, I'd guess the country is not big on subsidizing alternate energy.While I'm not sold on the argument, perhaps your utility provider is partially responsible for the failure of providing an incentive for customers to move over to solar, by providing energy costs that are simply too low, failing to justify a reason for its customers to move over to installing solar systems and exercise behaviors that focus on conservation.Comment
-
One thing that has changed is NEM3.5 years ago, when I decided to install a solar rooftop system, that decision was easily made, given the fact that San Diego Gas & Electric Company had the highest rates in the Country. Nothing has changed. The cost of electricity for peak consumption during the summer months for TOU-EV2 was $0.68/kWh. This year that cost is increasing to $0.83/kWh. That represents a 20% increase in the cost. Not as bad as natural gas, with what is tantamount to a 100% increase since last January ($2.36/therm [1/2022] to $5.11/therm [1/2023]}.Comment
-
Comment
-
Its ok. Its usually the people that use the least amount of energy that suffers first.. out of sight, out of mind.
Comment
-
Provider is the State. Honestly, its not the subsidies that I have a problem with but the lack of interest in pursuing a vision of a country that is low carbon or carbon free. Everyone just sits and waits for **** to hit the fan because scrambling to find an umbrella. While we have the resources to do so, we should invest in the technology and infrastructure to reduce both our cost and footprint. Anyway, maybe when the costs of silicon drops further.While I'm not sold on the argument, perhaps your utility provider is partially responsible for the failure of providing an incentive for customers to move over to solar, by providing energy costs that are simply too low, failing to justify a reason for its customers to move over to installing solar systems and exercise behaviors that focus on conservation.Comment
-
Comment
-
I mean that people in developed nations consume the most amount of power and contribute the most to global emissions but people in poor and developing countries are the ones who are worst affected. Case in point, Pakistan.Comment
-
Yet both China and India burn more coal than any other nation. So while countries like Pakistan may suffer those are not the ones I am concerned of.Comment
-
Shifting the blame doesnt do any good for anyone. No country is free from blame including mine. If we dont change our mindsets, we are simply digging humanity's own grave.Comment
-
I appreciate the sentiment and probably agree with some of it but it's an exercise in futility as it amounts to little more than naive and ignorant daydreaming.
Reason: Changing the collective planet mindset will involve changing human nature.
Good luck on that one.
Seems to me that according to those with little historical perspective and/or those who make money with a desire to derive power off human ignorance and fear have always portrayed the world as having one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel.Comment
-
$.83hWh??!!!! I thought the recent 20% increase in Western Massachusetts to $0.362 must have been among the highest in the country. NOT EVEN CLOSE!5 years ago, when I decided to install a solar rooftop system, that decision was easily made, given the fact that San Diego Gas & Electric Company had the highest rates in the Country. Nothing has changed. The cost of electricity for peak consumption during the summer months for TOU-EV2 was $0.68/kWh. This year that cost is increasing to $0.83/kWh. That represents a 20% increase in the cost. Not as bad as natural gas, with what is tantamount to a 100% increase since last January ($2.36/therm [1/2022] to $5.11/therm [1/2023]}.Comment
Copyright © 2014 SolarReviews All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.1.3
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 01:02 PM.
Comment