Dan: What makes you think we haven't seen what you refer to ? Seems a bit rude and presumptuous to do that.
The way I leaned it, if I have something to offer, I state my views and then offer backup detail, either by reprint or quotation if I'm in an enabling mood, or by reference the source(s) to backup my opinions, if I feel such backup is warranted and or helpful.
You seem not to do that with most of your posts, but instead, only point to cherry picked references, I guess assuming we'll all be able to guess that you agree with what you referenced. Seems lazy and again presumptuous on your part. What you do in such cases adds nothing to the discussion that can't be found elsewhere. It's like you have no opinion of your own and nothing to add to the discussion except what you seem to imply fits your view of reality without offering any substantial reasoning why you may agree with what you reference. It's also safe ( "I never said that").
More arrogance: For you to write: "I'm sure there's a better and more complete answer to your question out there; I could keep looking if you like." - assumes you can do what others are incapable of doing, or that they have not.
You write SK and I treat you in a rude manner. I think (not that you may care) that you treat most everyone in a rude and disrespectful manner in ways I partially describe above. Get some common sense and social awareness and use those new fond attributes to get some manners and be more respectful. It's all about perceptions. Fair enough ?
The way I leaned it, if I have something to offer, I state my views and then offer backup detail, either by reprint or quotation if I'm in an enabling mood, or by reference the source(s) to backup my opinions, if I feel such backup is warranted and or helpful.
You seem not to do that with most of your posts, but instead, only point to cherry picked references, I guess assuming we'll all be able to guess that you agree with what you referenced. Seems lazy and again presumptuous on your part. What you do in such cases adds nothing to the discussion that can't be found elsewhere. It's like you have no opinion of your own and nothing to add to the discussion except what you seem to imply fits your view of reality without offering any substantial reasoning why you may agree with what you reference. It's also safe ( "I never said that").
More arrogance: For you to write: "I'm sure there's a better and more complete answer to your question out there; I could keep looking if you like." - assumes you can do what others are incapable of doing, or that they have not.
You write SK and I treat you in a rude manner. I think (not that you may care) that you treat most everyone in a rude and disrespectful manner in ways I partially describe above. Get some common sense and social awareness and use those new fond attributes to get some manners and be more respectful. It's all about perceptions. Fair enough ?
Comment