Bruce,
You seem to be a DIY type of guy from the posts from you that I have read.
Why not do a solar tracker? I have seen some on ebay for $155. for a 4 panel array.
My thought instead of a "tracker" why not just have the panels move to a predetermined position?
Something like 30 deg to the East till 10am flat or horizontal from 10am till 2pm then 30 deg west after 2pm. (you would probably have to adjust angles and times for your location)
It could be made a little more robust than a tracker, and you might be able to tip fully vertical to drop the snow off of your array.
Just a thought, how crazy do you think my idea is?
Most Popular Topics
Collapse
Sun hours
Collapse
X
-
Leave a comment:
-
Don't forget about September there will be a difference from march due to higher tempsLeave a comment:
-
I suppose that you could coin a term like Multiple Array Orientation Factor (MAOF) to describe this.
But for any particular installation, the value of that factor will depend on the exact orientation of the two sub arrays, the morning and afternoon weather at the site, etc.
You can get a useful approximation of this factor by looking up the PVwatts values for the two arrays separately and comparing it to the PVwatts value for a single south facing array of the same size as one of the sub-arrays.
As long as there is not an overlap between the producing hours of the two sub-arrays which would exceed the input wattage of the GTI or CC and cause clipping, this should give you the number you want.
But in the real world, you may also need to factor in Time Of Use rate structures, etc., and PVwatts will not do that for you.
considering the Time Of Use, since it doesn't apply here. This idea can't be pushed too far before
some clipping happens, so I think an hour by hour simulation of each orientation must then be
added up, and limited on any hour to the maximum. It will also vary by season; I thought running
it for 20 Dec, 20 Mar, and 20 June would give a good picture. Bruce RoeLeave a comment:
-
I was just thinking about the definition of SUN HOURS. Like, with my sun rise to sunset being
10:50 hours now, the total energy hitting a given panel might be equivalent to 5 hours of perfect
sun noon. So then its 5 SUN HOURS that day, location, and alignment.
Working this backwards, harvesting 110 KWH divided by 15 KW inverter maximum (clipping)
level, gives 7.33 equivalent SUN HOURS. The idea of course is to stretch the sun day by adding
panels directly facing the rising & setting sun. Comparing this to the basic sun hours could be
a multiplying factor for the panel arrangement. Probably the factor doesn't have a name? I'm
still looking for a tool to use, to predict this factor. Bruce Roe
But for any particular installation, the value of that factor will depend on the exact orientation of the two sub arrays, the morning and afternoon weather at the site, etc.
You can get a useful approximation of this factor by looking up the PVwatts values for the two arrays separately and comparing it to the PVwatts value for a single south facing array of the same size as one of the sub-arrays.
As long as there is not an overlap between the producing hours of the two sub-arrays which would exceed the input wattage of the GTI or CC and cause clipping, this should give you the number you want.
But in the real world, you may also need to factor in Time Of Use rate structures, etc., and PVwatts will not do that for you.Leave a comment:
-
Sun hours
I was just thinking about the definition of SUN HOURS. Like, with my sun rise to sunset being
10:50 hours now, the total energy hitting a given panel might be equivalent to 5 hours of perfect
sun noon. So then its 5 SUN HOURS that day, location, and alignment.
Working this backwards, harvesting 110 KWH divided by 15 KW inverter maximum (clipping)
level, gives 7.33 equivalent SUN HOURS. The idea of course is to stretch the sun day by adding
panels directly facing the rising & setting sun. Comparing this to the basic sun hours could be
a multiplying factor for the panel arrangement. Probably the factor doesn't have a name? I'm
still looking for a tool to use, to predict this factor. Bruce Roe
Leave a comment: