Ground mounting setup

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bcroe
    replied
    Originally posted by Kuma


    I hope that is not your rack. The person who constructed that should not own a hammer. The materials are very telling.
    No x-bracing... lol No worries about a herd of horses running down the road. The panels will not be in the pastures.

    Seems like I need provide more background for some of you. I have been a general contractor on my own homes. And, have built barns, remodeled entire houses. Literally gutting them and personally doing the electrical, plumbing, windows, cabinet installs, tear down and add additional walls.... I also work on my own cars and motorcycles. And not just oil and plug changes...
    Darn, now I have to turn in my hammers, if I can find them all. That TEST panel was estimated to stay
    up for 6 months, and thats exactly what it did. Too bad I didn't take it down before the snow hit.

    Among the livestock here are some big horses, I believe some of those seen pulling the
    Bud Wagon were brought up just around the corner. Only seen the fence briefly down once.

    I know enough about my 5 cars to rebuild all the automatic transmissions and convert them
    to switch pitch, but would much rather be doing something electronic. Bruce Roe

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by Kuma


    I posted AHJ requirements two posts above your post - read #42.


    As a contractor, I'm sure you are familiar with building codes and engineering requirements. Good luck on you latest efforts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kuma
    replied
    Originally posted by bcroe
    If the construction is inadequate, it could end up like this. Much less critical than a fence failure, which could release
    some of the half ton critters so common here onto the road. This test panel went up on the longest day, to serve for
    measurements through the shortest day, which it did. But the stand was left and didn't survive the winter; fortunately
    the panel wasn't damaged.

    Build what is necessary in your location. That may be tougher where there are hurricanes or the ground shakes. Here
    in the Wild West zoned Ag, a 65' radio tower or a fence do not require a permit or inspection. A ground mount is just
    another fence. Bruce Roe

    NS6motst.JPGNStwr12.JPG

    I hope that is not your rack. The person who constructed that should not own a hammer. The materials are very telling. No x-bracing... lol


    No worries about a herd of horses running down the road. The panels will not be in the pastures.

    Seems like I need provide more background for some of you. I have been a general contractor on my own homes. And, have built barns, remodeled entire houses. Literally gutting them and personally doing the electrical, plumbing, windows, cabinet installs, tear down and add additional walls.... I also work on my own cars and motorcycles. And not just oil and plug changes...

    Leave a comment:


  • Kuma
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    As with any solar design, if you are in CA and follow the rules, the design will need to pass through the AHJ. Part of that process will usually mean review and approval of the structural portion of the design which usually requires a design that was done by a P.E. Such approval can also and usually take the form of standard designs from racking outfits which have limitations stipulated with them for wind, seismic and other types of loadings. If standard, erector set type of racking is used, and as long as the racking is done according to the design plans and is located in an area within the racking mfg. stated design limits, it ought to be OK.

    DIY stuff will probably, but not entirely without exception require a design done/stamped by a P.E.

    I posted AHJ requirements two posts above your post - read #42.



    Leave a comment:


  • bcroe
    replied
    If the construction is inadequate, it could end up like this. Much less critical than a fence failure, which could release
    some of the half ton critters so common here onto the road. This test panel went up on the longest day, to serve for
    measurements through the shortest day, which it did. But the stand was left and didn't survive the winter; fortunately
    the panel wasn't damaged.

    Build what is necessary in your location. That may be tougher where there are hurricanes or the ground shakes. Here
    in the Wild West zoned Ag, a 65' radio tower or a fence do not require a permit or inspection. A ground mount is just
    another fence. Bruce Roe

    NS6motst.JPGNStwr12.JPG

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by Kuma

    Understood, although side loads on fence posts due to horses is worth noting. As is x-bracing and vertical strength. The other consideration for the ground mount is galv. fence posts. With a 30* tilt and not stacking panels, the highest point will be ~ 5.5'.
    As with any solar design, if you are in CA and follow the rules, the design will need to pass through the AHJ. Part of that process will usually mean review and approval of the structural portion of the design which usually requires a design that was done by a P.E. Such approval can also and usually take the form of standard designs from racking outfits which have limitations stipulated with them for wind, seismic and other types of loadings. If standard, erector set type of racking is used, and as long as the racking is done according to the design plans and is located in an area within the racking mfg. stated design limits, it ought to be OK.

    DIY stuff will probably, but not entirely without exception require a design done/stamped by a P.E.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kuma
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    While wood is a viable engineering material with lots of advantages, it is often passed over in favor of other materials, usually metals, for solar arrays, depending on the application. Over time, metals often seem to handle deterioration and weakening from vibration induced stresses better than wood, those wind induced vibration stresses commonly being of a larger magnitude for solar arrays than other structures such as fences.
    Understood, although side loads on fence posts due to horses is worth noting. As is x-bracing and vertical strength. The other consideration for the ground mount is galv. fence posts. With a 30* tilt and not stacking panels, the highest point will be ~ 5.5'.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kuma
    replied
    Originally posted by tyab
    Hello Kuma. As a fellow Cal guy be aware that any structure you do will most likely need a PE stamp for it in your permit package that take into account soil conditions and all expected loads. Many areas want calcs for 100 MPH of wind. The savings of a self engineered mount could easily be lost in engineering fees. Just food for thought as you continue your research.

    Yes, researched the requirements. Per the County PV Systems code:

    "For Ground Mount and Wind Generator Systems Provide:

    [ ] Engineering [When the total height from ground to top of the array (not post height) exceeds 6 feet] for mounting, attachments, and foundation to meet the minimum wind and snow loads. Provide details of attachments, anchors, brackets, photovoltaic panels, and all hardware. "

    Leave a comment:


  • tyab
    replied
    Hello Kuma. As a fellow Cal guy be aware that any structure you do will most likely need a PE stamp for it in your permit package that take into account soil conditions and all expected loads. Many areas want calcs for 100 MPH of wind. The savings of a self engineered mount could easily be lost in engineering fees. Just food for thought as you continue your research.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by Kuma
    Planning a dyi 5kw+ solar ground mount in Nor Cal. Have looked at many rack options and still have not ruled out a PT frame structure. I live in 5 acres and have MANY PT fence posts in concrete 12+ years old that still look very good. And these are in the sun all day. Unlike a solar frame structure which it seems a majority of the posts would be shaded at different parts of the day. The 10+ year old PT deck structure that is elevated 6' on one side due to slope conditions, also looks great. The decks 2x6 PT floor joists are in excellent condition. I figure, given my age, if the PT lasts 20+ years, it may outlast me. And if I last more then 20, the last thing of concern would be a 20 yr old solar system.
    While wood is a viable engineering material with lots of advantages, it is often passed over in favor of other materials, usually metals, for solar arrays, depending on the application. Over time, metals often seem to handle deterioration and weakening from vibration induced stresses better than wood, those wind induced vibration stresses commonly being of a larger magnitude for solar arrays than other structures such as fences.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kuma
    replied
    Planning a dyi 5kw+ solar ground mount in Nor Cal. Have looked at many rack options and still have not ruled out a PT frame structure. I live in 5 acres and have MANY PT fence posts in concrete 12+ years old that still look very good. And these are in the sun all day. Unlike a solar frame structure which it seems a majority of the posts would be shaded at different parts of the day. The 10+ year old PT deck structure that is elevated 6' on one side due to slope conditions, also looks great. The decks 2x6 PT floor joists are in excellent condition. I figure, given my age, if the PT lasts 20+ years, it may outlast me. And if I last more then 20, the last thing of concern would be a 20 yr old solar system.

    Leave a comment:


  • bcroe
    replied
    Right, don't put aluminum directly in concrete. This was some kind of coating for this ap, done by the
    aluminum supplier. So far looks fine. Bruce

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle

    I agree that aluminum and concrete are not a good combination. But Bruce mentioned "coated aluminum" so I wonder what the "coating" was that might inhibit corrosion and cracking.
    Something that's also, among other things an electrical isolator. Most of the problem is galvanic.

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike90250
    I'd like to discourage folks from thinking about using aluminun with concrete
    http://www.concreteconstruction.net/...-controversy_o
    I agree that aluminum and concrete are not a good combination. But Bruce mentioned "coated aluminum" so I wonder what the "coating" was that might inhibit corrosion and cracking.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike90250
    I'd like to discourage folks from thinking about using aluminun with concrete
    http://www.concreteconstruction.net/...-controversy_o
    I'll second that one.

    Leave a comment:

Working...