So I have just received my first annual true-up bill. $0.27. My understanding was I wanted to install a system to be as close to zero as possible. Am I correct in this assessment or is there something else I am failing to consider. I thinking I am lucky as I was only in the house for 5 months before buying the system and therefore didn't have a proper 12 months of energy use history to use as a guide.
Most Popular Topics
Collapse
Just a Lucky Guess?
Collapse
X
-
-
So I have just received my first annual true-up bill. $0.27. My understanding was I wanted to install a system to be as close to zero as possible. Am I correct in this assessment or is there something else I am failing to consider. I thinking I am lucky as I was only in the house for 5 months before buying the system and therefore didn't have a proper 12 months of energy use history to use as a guide.
Without adjusting/tweaking usage, next year will, in all likelihood, have a different trueup amount and be different if for no other reasons than the weather next year, including how much the sun shines, will not be the same as the year just ended, and your usage will be different, not to mention POCO rates and tariff structure will most likely be different next year than this year - just as much BTW - as rates and tariff structure before your PV were different than after.
An array located in a region that has a reasonably stable climate with a fair amount of sunshine - think SW U.S. - will usually have less year/year variation (maybe +/- 5% or so, or more) in system production than an array located in regions with more yearly climatic variation - think NE/upper Midwest U.S. - where more year/year variation in annual production - maybe +/- 10 % or so may be more common.
The +/- 10 % or so that PVWatts suggests for yearly variation for that model is mostly the result of weather variation, and, even if the model user inputs are reasonable representations of reality, that's still a rather soft number.
Hard to quantify. Impossible to predict with any more accuracy than it's possible to predict next year's weather, or what lifestyle changes will do to usage.
So, more a lucky guess ? Probably, depending. -
So I have just received my first annual true-up bill. $0.27. My understanding was I wanted to install a system to be as close to zero as possible. Am I correct in this assessment or is there something else I am failing to consider. I thinking I am lucky as I was only in the house for 5 months before buying the system and therefore didn't have a proper 12 months of energy use history to use as a guide.Comment
-
Thanks guys for the responses.
I am on PG&E in N.Cal.
If I knew how to post a screenshot of my true-up bill, I would do so. I can only see a PDF which I can't redact personal info.
@JPM... I understand what you are saying about the varying influences that would effect (or is it affect) the amount of energy produced by my sa and in kind effect my true-up bill. While luck did play some part, I did nothing more to change my usage habits than constantly telling my wife she does not need three TV's, and God only knows how many lights, on when she is the only one home. "But honey, we have solar now" is a common response. I choose to limit the number battles I know I will NEVER win. I am learning.
@cebury...I understand that I may have oversized the system. I did so with the intention of adding a hot tub (elec). That being said, are you saying that I may still add the tub and possibly only see a slight (or maybe none) increase in my annual true-up? Some time ago I posted here an inquiry about the cost oversizing/overproducing.
Last edited by Steve C; 01-04-2017, 08:47 PM.Comment
-
Reminds me of the linguistic usage conundrum Daniel Webster was in on his death bed when he (allegedly) said the following: "I am going to die, or, I am about to die. Either is correct."Comment
-
You can affect something by changing it or changing its environment.
You effect something by making it happen, bringing it about.
Things may have effects, which they bring about, but changes to things are not affects!
Affect, the noun is specialized word used in describing behavior and interaction in psychiatry. Not used at all (properly that is) in everyday speech unless you are in the medical profession.SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.Comment
-
When I saw there were two new responses to my inquiry, I suppose I was expecting something slightly different. However, Both responses had quite the effect ( as it brought about a smile) on my mood at the time... and that is much appreciated. Or, is it Affect as it CHANGED my mood??? Great, now I'm smiling and confused as to whether or not I should get a hot tub!Comment
-
When I saw there were two new responses to my inquiry, I suppose I was expecting something slightly different. However, Both responses had quite the effect ( as it brought about a smile) on my mood at the time... and that is much appreciated. Or, is it Affect as it CHANGED my mood??? Great, now I'm smiling and confused as to whether or not I should get a hot tub!
: the conscious subjective aspect of an emotion considered apart from bodily changes; also : a set of observable manifestations of a subjectively experienced emotion <patients showed perfectly normal reactions and affects - Oliver Sacks>Last edited by inetdog; 01-04-2017, 11:06 PM.SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.Comment
Comment