enphase s280 with LG315N1C-G4

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Engineer
    commented on 's reply
    Thanks, I went for the best system I could instead of trying to save every dollar, being an engineer I can't stand anything less. Also I found that given that the base install cost was so much that paying for a bit more didn't add much to the system cost while it did bring down the cost/kWh.

  • jetsurgn
    replied
    Engineer, what a wonderful system! I installed 12 lg 310 with the M250 so I'll be studying your system to see how much power I'm losing by not having the s280's instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • Engineer
    commented on 's reply
    ButchDeal - yeah we've had a couple of perfect sunny days so far and no clipping I could see at all. Total system delivered 6.1kW peak on 6.9kW theoretical maximum.
    Last edited by Engineer; 05-06-2016, 10:40 AM.

  • ButchDeal
    commented on 's reply
    S280 is a better fit than the M250 for these, should have negligible clipping with the S280.

  • Engineer
    replied
    I just had that exact system installed. 7kW total, 22 LG315N1C-G4 LG panels (315W) and S280 inverters. Enphase says "Commonly used module pairing – input power: 235 W – 365W", really it depends on the max input voltage with is 48V.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by ButchDeal


    that is my point. enphase is behind the curve on current production levels and is more costly than the competition.
    Why pay for premium modules like LG310s and then not harvest all the power?

    It would cost LESS on most systems to install SolarEdge than to install enphase (very small systems are the exception).
    SolarEdge doesn't have the clipping and is easily able to keep up with new production levels.
    As has been suggested, running PVWatts and using the advanced parameters to adjust the DC to AC size ratio to = panel size/inverter size may give an approximation of clipping penalty by comparing the annual output to that using a "larger" inverter that doesn't clip and comparing the two #'s. Might be useful.

    Leave a comment:


  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by jetsurgn
    I clip with M250 / LG 310 but upgrading to the s280 won't be worth the upgrade cost.

    that is my point. enphase is behind the curve on current production levels and is more costly than the competition.
    Why pay for premium modules like LG310s and then not harvest all the power?

    It would cost LESS on most systems to install SolarEdge than to install enphase (very small systems are the exception).
    SolarEdge doesn't have the clipping and is easily able to keep up with new production levels.

    Leave a comment:


  • jetsurgn
    replied
    I clip with M250 / LG 310 but upgrading to the s280 won't be worth the upgrade cost.

    Leave a comment:


  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by jetsurgn
    Just a guess, but Enphase has to be working on a larger capacity.
    I am sure that they are but they just came out with the S280 and the module manufacturers are not waiting though.

    Leave a comment:


  • jetsurgn
    replied
    Just a guess, but Enphase has to be working on a larger capacity.

    Leave a comment:


  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by randomuser
    Enphase has to be developing a larger inverter to come out "soon", right? Jrfiero is clipping with 315W panels. My LG 320W panels are sitting at my home, ready for install. What's LG going to have next year? I assume Enphase must have a new inverter in the hopper or they won't be perceived as an innovator.
    The S280 is the new inverter from enphase. They are late coming out with it and now it is pretty much too little too late

    Leave a comment:


  • randomuser
    replied
    Enphase has to be developing a larger inverter to come out "soon", right? Jrfiero is clipping with 315W panels. My LG 320W panels are sitting at my home, ready for install. What's LG going to have next year? I assume Enphase must have a new inverter in the hopper or they won't be perceived as an innovator.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    One thing hard to quantify that may add to the perception and reality of clipping is the amount of overdesign (or looked at another way, the conservative guarantees or panel rating claims by mfgs.)

    If, for example, a panel claims 315 Watts, +5/-0% at S.T.C., it's output might be and probably will be greater than 315 Watts at some time, not only because of some combination of higher irradiance, low incidence angle, low ambient temp. and a breeze, but also because it's efficiency is perhaps and probably a couple % or so higher than the spec sheet says.

    Still, the amount of time an LG 315's output will be > 280 Watts and how much in excess of 280 Watts it will actually be will probably result in a small amount of the total annual output being lost due to clipping.

    Leave a comment:


  • jrfiero
    replied
    Originally posted by sensij

    When you run PVWatts again, pay special attention to the advanced parameter "DC to AC ratio". You system is sized at a ratio of 315 / 280 = 1.125. You can compare that to a ratio of 1.0 to see the amount lost to clipping. With your equipment, I would run the model at 8% loss and premium panels.

    I didn't say that your clipping has or has not yet maxed out. Power output *will* decrease as temps rise, and the temperature at the panels is much higher than the ambient air, especially if they are mounted on a roof. From what I've seen, clipping for 3-4 hours in mid April will pretty much subside by June, but there is nothing wrong with waiting and seeing.

    Sensij, good info, thanks. I should have said "(I note you say they won't continue to increase steadily)." Criticism aside, I love watching my system. I'll never see clouds quite the same way again!
    Jonas

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    Originally posted by jrfiero


    I'll have to wait and see. Re the temps, we rarely have 90* days here, and usually have a breeze. I see your point "The efficiency of those panels is paying off every non-clipped hour of the day," but I'm skeptical of "more than compensating for any clipped energy." The number of clipped quarter-hours shown in MyEnlighten is increasing steadily (I note you say they won't). Just wish an inverter capable of inverting the entire DC output had been used. I'll run PVWatts again, can't remember the result, I do know the azimuth and angle (155, 22).
    When you run PVWatts again, pay special attention to the advanced parameter "DC to AC ratio". You system is sized at a ratio of 315 / 280 = 1.125. You can compare that to a ratio of 1.0 to see the amount lost to clipping. With your equipment, I would run the model at 8% loss and premium panels.

    I didn't say that your clipping has or has not yet maxed out. Power output *will* decrease as temps rise, and the temperature at the panels is much higher than the ambient air, especially if they are mounted on a roof. From what I've seen, clipping for 3-4 hours in mid April will pretty much subside by June, but there is nothing wrong with waiting and seeing.

    Leave a comment:

Working...