There is no dispute about the losses of wires, batteries, inverters, etc. But lets
review charge controllers for a minute. I don't know much about PWM controllers,
since I would never use something with so many negatives.
My understanding is the PWM is really an on-off switch, varying the on time duty
cycle to limit average power as needed. So if the panel Vmp happened to match
the voltage required to match the battery requirement at that time, the efficiency
could approach 100%.
In fact battery charging voltage varies a lot, and panel Vmp varies quite a bit with
temperature, so they hardly ever exactly match. To the extent they mismatch,
efficiency is lost. There might also be a series diode loss to prevent night discharge,
which will be more damaging in the lower voltage circuit. The diode loss can be
avoided electronically at some cost.
MPPT controllers manage to always operate panels at the best possible point for
conditions, matching them efficiently to the battery. They have the additional
advantage of being able to operate at an uncritical, higher input voltage, reducing
wiring losses. Is this all accurate? Bruce Roe
Affordable Charge Controller for AGM Battery
Collapse
X
-
Leave a comment:
-
Looks like the King and the Queen are having a Royal discussion.Leave a comment:
-
Reality sucks sometimes huh?
It really comes down to experience. All that stuff you learned in school is useless academic nonsense. It just gives you the tools to learn when you are out. That is why most teachers teach, they cannot cut it in the real application world. Takes 5 to 10 years of experience to learn the skills on top of education. It sucks, but real.Leave a comment:
-
Oh sure, throw math and logic at me....
It makes sense, the truth hurts.Leave a comment:
-
As I said, you guys have convinced me not to use .67 for PWM, I just haven't settled on a number yet, because it also takes into account dirt, voltage drop, etc. .6 is still too high, but I haven't been able to jump down to .5 yet (although that's probably where I will land).
1. Voltage loss between Panels and Controller = 2 to 3%. 97 to 98 watts into controller.
2. Controller efficiency PWM at very bet is 67%. 97 in, 65 watts out.
3. Battery charge efficiency = 80% down to 52 watts.
4. Wire loss between batteries and load @ 1% around 51 watts. Good luck keeping losses to 1% for more than 5 feet to load.
50% IMO is to generous if you throw an inverter in the loop. Realistically something lower than 50%Leave a comment:
-
Stop and think about it Amy. If you use a very expensive 100 watt battery panel (you are forced to use battery panels with PWM) the Specs are:
Vmp = 17 volts
Imp = 5.8 amps
- Use a PWM controller and you have 5.8 amps of charge current right? Perhaps as much as 6 amps on a really dead battery pulling the panel down to Isc range.
- Use a MPPT controller on the same or a much less expensive GT panel and you get 95 watts (95% efficiency) / 12 volts = 7.9 amps right?
Which is Greater? 5.8 or 7.9?
I was working on the assumption that he already has the 100W panel, and his original question was for a PWM charge controller under $50. If not, and he has a local source for a grid tied panel, and therefore doesn't have to pay $250 to ship it via truck, and is willing to spend $200 for an MPPT charge controller, then heck yah, a 250W 60 cell panel and a BlueSky SolarBoost SB2512i-HV or Morningstar SunSaver SS-MPPT-15L is the way to go.Leave a comment:
-
Vmp = 17 volts
Imp = 5.8 amps
- Use a PWM controller and you have 5.8 amps of charge current right? Perhaps as much as 6 amps on a really dead battery pulling the panel down to Isc range.
- Use a MPPT controller on the same or a much less expensive GT panel and you get 95 watts (95% efficiency) / 12 volts = 7.9 amps right?
Which is Greater? 5.8 or 7.9?
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Amy, According to the NREL calculator I get 6.43 average sun hours a day. Is there any reason I should assume less here?
Is the 0.6 efficiency number based on a PWM based charger setup? I was hoping to squeeze a little more out with a MPPT charger.
As SunKing said, you have to use worst case for sunhours, not average. I see 5.78 sun hours for Phoenix.
So, using more precise numbers, 100W x 5.78 x .67 = 387Wh in the winter. Still not enough with MPPT. Let's try average, 100W x 6.43 x .67 = 430Wh. Nope.
430Wh / 50W light = 8.6 hours you can run the light at full power 3 season out of the year.Leave a comment:
-
Battery size is based on watt hours used in a day time 5 and divided by battery voltage. So assuming 500 watt hours per day and a 12 volt battery you get [500 wh x 5] / 12 volts = 208 AH.Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Amy, According to the NREL calculator I get 6.43 average sun hours a day. Is there any reason I should assume less here?
Only Grid Tied systems use yearly average. You build credits in summer, and use them in winter. There is no credit in battery systems, you live day to dayLeave a comment:
-
Is the 0.6 efficiency number based on a PWM based charger setup? I was hoping to squeeze a little more out with a MPPT charger.Leave a comment:
-
100W panel x 5.5 sun hours in AZ x.6 efficiency = 330Wh of power generated. You need 600Wh. Unless that regulator brings the power use of the light way down, you have only half the solar you need.Leave a comment:
-
To do that you need 250 watt solar panel if using a 20 amp MPPT controller, or 360 watts of panel using a 20 amp PWM controller. Then a 12 volt 210 AH battery, about the size you have now except a new one.Leave a comment:
-
An important question hasn't been asked. How much power will you be using a day? All of the discussions have been assuming using 50% of the battery a day. If you are only using a small fraction of the battery capacity, you don't need to refill that much, just what you used.
I recommend a Morningstar SunSaver SS-10-12V. It does 3 stage charging, has a jumper to select flooded vs AGM, and costs under $50.
Thanks for the recommendation.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: