I've been trying to figure out for awhile now why solar system batteries are so expensive.
I've been exploring automotive for cost comparison, how ever there is some confusion with automotive. Only because ampere hours arent listed as they can be on most solar batteries.
I did find a good automotive battery that claims deep cycle, listed as optima D35 , I'm just having some problems deciphering the AMPS. Its not listed at AMPER Hours, just listed as C/20 good for 770 AMPS @32* F, 620 AMPS @ 0*F. So when I do the break down for the battery in a 20 hour time frame I get 770/20=38.5 AMPS an Hour assuming this is the Ah of the battery. How ever the optima spec chart is referencing a number of 48? Spec sheet claims that is 48 amps per hour. So something to me is conflicting between the spec chart and references.
Here is the optima spec sheet for that battery.

So in comparison I was looking at the Concorde Solar System Battery. This was the specs I could pull up. 12V at 49Amper Hours. That's all I could get from that.
Here are the claims.
Concorde batteries have a a lower self discharge rate—five times better than flooded batteries. Expected life cycles are 5000 cycles to 10% DOD, 1000cycles to 50% DOD. UL listed as a recognized system component. Meet DOT transportation requirements and are not restricted for shipment because they are exempted from hazardous materials category. All have copper alloy terminals and silicon bronze bolts.

Now between the optima and the Concorde the spec information is different and I cant fully decipher which one would be better. For the price I would rather go with the optima, no brainier there and it is back with a 1 year no hassle warranty. Concorde offers a 1 year warranty as well.
Automotive Optima I can get for $169.00
Solar System Concorde I can get for $190.00
My battery bank would look clean with the optima as well as I like to show off what I build. So what do you think would be the better performer in the long run?
I've been exploring automotive for cost comparison, how ever there is some confusion with automotive. Only because ampere hours arent listed as they can be on most solar batteries.
I did find a good automotive battery that claims deep cycle, listed as optima D35 , I'm just having some problems deciphering the AMPS. Its not listed at AMPER Hours, just listed as C/20 good for 770 AMPS @32* F, 620 AMPS @ 0*F. So when I do the break down for the battery in a 20 hour time frame I get 770/20=38.5 AMPS an Hour assuming this is the Ah of the battery. How ever the optima spec chart is referencing a number of 48? Spec sheet claims that is 48 amps per hour. So something to me is conflicting between the spec chart and references.
Here is the optima spec sheet for that battery.

So in comparison I was looking at the Concorde Solar System Battery. This was the specs I could pull up. 12V at 49Amper Hours. That's all I could get from that.
Here are the claims.
Concorde batteries have a a lower self discharge rate—five times better than flooded batteries. Expected life cycles are 5000 cycles to 10% DOD, 1000cycles to 50% DOD. UL listed as a recognized system component. Meet DOT transportation requirements and are not restricted for shipment because they are exempted from hazardous materials category. All have copper alloy terminals and silicon bronze bolts.

Now between the optima and the Concorde the spec information is different and I cant fully decipher which one would be better. For the price I would rather go with the optima, no brainier there and it is back with a 1 year no hassle warranty. Concorde offers a 1 year warranty as well.
Automotive Optima I can get for $169.00
Solar System Concorde I can get for $190.00
My battery bank would look clean with the optima as well as I like to show off what I build. So what do you think would be the better performer in the long run?
Comment