I just saw this today. It is facing North at 7 degrees. They also have panels on the south of this shed and of their house. The installer put conduit over and around their gutter. I am going to guess this is not free solar PPA as I don't think any installer would have put panels on the north as it would eat into their profits.
North facing Panels
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
At 7 deg tilt, the penalty for north facing isn't as much as for steeper installations. It is possible that the numbers still come out good enough to justify the choice.CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozxComment
-
I just saw this today. It is facing North at 7 degrees. They also have panels on the south of this shed and of their house. The installer put conduit over and around their gutter. I am going to guess this is not free solar PPA as I don't think any installer would have put panels on the north as it would eat into their profits.
Comment
-
7 degrees was the heading. Angle is 40 degrees.
PVWatts says that the south side will make 2.1x as much power as this side.
That makes a $4.50 per watt system act like a $9.45 per watt system that faces south.
But yeah on angle. My west-facing panels are going to be at 15 degree angle, so I am going to lose about 18% vs a south face. Had they been at a 40 degree angle, I would lose 25%.
The western orientation is going to make my 315 watt panels act as if they are 260 watt facing south.Last edited by rsilvers; 05-10-2016, 09:02 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Sorry, misunderstood. Thought the offending panels might be on the car port. Nothing good to say about this one.CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozxComment
-
To help me out, the array azimuthal angle is 7 degrees ? 40 deg. is the tilt or elevation angle off horizontal ?
Thanx.
Comment
-
Comment
-
In the winter the array would likely be shading ITSELF. What were they thinking?2.2kw Suntech mono, Classic 200, NEW Trace SW4024Comment
-
Comment
-
He decided to do a self install.
You can't help everyone.OutBack FP1 w/ CS6P-250P http://bit.ly/1Sg5VNHComment
-
They had two south-facing surfaces covered also. Maybe they were going to stop there, but realized that with the SRECs, also doing the north was better over 10 years than not also doing the north.
So they probably still made a better decision than the dozens of perfect south-facing wide-open roofs I saw today that had no solar at all.
Comment
-
I had extensive conversations with a customer that wanted PV on the north face of his home. He was trying to convince me that the sun was in the north of his home for a significant amount of the year due to his low lat. in San Diego area. I tried to explain things to him and he was quite biligerant that he is in the industry and knows what he is talking about, why are all the installers he talks to trying to tell him what he can clearly see (the sun).
He decided to do a self install.
You can't help everyone.Comment
-
Well I figured out kind of what was going on. his house faces due North and as he mentioned when he pulls out of his garage in the morning he is staring at the sun in the north. In his area the sun will rise just north of due east and set a few degrees north of west.
The problem is that he is at work all day and in between those two points the sun is on an arc swinging towards due South and then west.
so at the lowest points the sun is north of east west line but much of the day the sun is (obviously) south of the east west line....
was not able to convince him even though his south roof was large enough for the full array.
OutBack FP1 w/ CS6P-250P http://bit.ly/1Sg5VNHComment
Comment