X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DrLumen
    replied
    Originally posted by majorcuddles

    Hiya DrLumen ! Uh oh.... the 'under the heel' comment sounds a little ominous... Do you mind sharing what happened?

    Regarding the Vera, I'm a pretty big fan... I've had a Vera based system in three homes (including one rental property) since 2013 and am pretty pleased with it as the most effective consumer solution that I've found for my uses.*

    I've had my Vera bridged to several other non Z-Wave devices as well which is a really helpful integration point for me:
    -Lutron Caseta Smart Pro: Controls Honeycomb Shades and Roller Blinds in the house
    -Chamberlain MyQ garage door operator
    -IP Cameras
    -Alexa, Nest, and I've had it bridged to a Honeywell Security System to expose the Honeywell sensors to Vera as well.

    *It's also noting that plenty of professional Home Automation / AV installers use Vera based systems as well.
    As to GP&L, somehow they were able to sidestep and opt-out of the deregulation. I haven't really researched how that was possible but they did it. Almost all of Garland has to use GP&L. No choice.

    All the people I have dealt with at the city has been great but their interconnect agreement has a clause in it that roughly says 'We are not obligated to buy back or re-imburse for over production'. Currently, they only pay regeneration rates for over production which is only 2 or 3 cents per kWh. I will be getting a bill credit for $5k so that helps but, again, not really market rates for solar incentives. Oncor or some other utility would pay like $7k in incentives.

    If you lose your internet connection, are you still able to control the stuff in Vera? I know Alexa is lost in space without an internet connection. The Samsung ST hub has to be controlled via the internet (phone app) as well. That is what I'm trying to get away from.

    I have my security system and cameras intentionally isolated from anything z-wave or wireless. While that does eliminate some of the convenience it also eliminates some concerns. I can't unlock the front door from Amsterdam but I don't foresee ever needing that ability. By the same token, neither can anyone else.

    Leave a comment:


  • majorcuddles
    replied
    Originally posted by cebury
    Welcome to the forum and I hope your system works to your liking. I also have a hard time seeing any simple payback under 15 years, but that is your money not mine. We do tend to get lots of folks coming asking for advice on the most cost effective proposals, so I cringed a bit when I saw both you and DrLumen were from Tx because we have had these conversations a few times with folks comparing their quotes with others from CA where the installation costs may be near the same, but the simple payback is much different since we are averaging in the 25ish cents per kwh.

    Either way, glad to have you guys here.
    Thanks for the welcome cebury !

    Leave a comment:


  • majorcuddles
    replied
    Originally posted by DrLumen

    Congrats and welcome. I recently had a 8.4kW system installed under the heel of Garland Power & Light.

    How is the Vera working out? I am using a Samsung SmartThings hub for most all except the security system. I don't like all the cloud dependency though. Will Vera run locally? I am looking at a Universal Devices ISY994 but the jury is still out.
    Hiya DrLumen ! Uh oh.... the 'under the heel' comment sounds a little ominous... Do you mind sharing what happened?

    Regarding the Vera, I'm a pretty big fan... I've had a Vera based system in three homes (including one rental property) since 2013 and am pretty pleased with it as the most effective consumer solution that I've found for my uses.*

    I've had my Vera bridged to several other non Z-Wave devices as well which is a really helpful integration point for me:
    -Lutron Caseta Smart Pro: Controls Honeycomb Shades and Roller Blinds in the house
    -Chamberlain MyQ garage door operator
    -IP Cameras
    -Alexa, Nest, and I've had it bridged to a Honeywell Security System to expose the Honeywell sensors to Vera as well.

    *It's also noting that plenty of professional Home Automation / AV installers use Vera based systems as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrLumen
    replied
    cebury, I'm currently paying about 11 cents per kWh and the payoff for mine was about 12 years for worst case. From what I know of Green Mountain, majorcuddles is paying a bit more. However, he is likely getting a better buyback deal. If we were paying 25 cents per kWh like CA then it would really be worth the cost. I did it more as a hedge against rising electric costs and to try to eliminate future bills. Even if it takes 20 years to re-coop the costs, I still get 5 years (assuming all the panels drop dead at 25 years) of free electric.

    I also work from home so that allows most of our household usage (AC in the Texas summers) while the panels are producing.

    Leave a comment:


  • cebury
    replied
    Welcome to the forum and I hope your system works to your liking. I also have a hard time seeing any simple payback under 15 years, but that is your money not mine. We do tend to get lots of folks coming asking for advice on the most cost effective proposals, so I cringed a bit when I saw both you and DrLumen were from Tx because we have had these conversations a few times with folks comparing their quotes with others from CA where the installation costs may be near the same, but the simple payback is much different since we are averaging in the 25ish cents per kwh.

    Either way, glad to have you guys here.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrLumen
    replied
    Originally posted by majorcuddles
    Well Solar family, I've just signed my commitment for a residential solar system...
    My Wheels: Model X 75D | Autopilot 1 | Reserved 7/10/16 In-gallery | Delivered 9/16 | Referral: ask me questions!
    My Home: 9.8kW Solar PV System | Vera Plus Z-Wave |
    Congrats and welcome. I recently had a 8.4kW system installed under the heel of Garland Power & Light.

    How is the Vera working out? I am using a Samsung SmartThings hub for most all except the security system. I don't like all the cloud dependency though. Will Vera run locally? I am looking at a Universal Devices ISY994 but the jury is still out.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by majorcuddles

    Goodness... You and J.P.M. are awfully fixated on this breakeven point. To both your points, I do have some non monetary objectives here. I also think your assumptions are a bit simplistic on how my current rate plan is structured. Here's my last 6 months of bills ($619).

    But moving along... I'm looking forward to the build out and learning as this progresses. Any thoughts other than poking holes at the assumed payback period? LOL
    (I'm not trying to be a total smartass here... all bidders had a payback period that ranged between 9-12 years... So I think it's more that I'm not conveying something effectively in the base scenario)
    Just using your numbers. Actually, I'm more interested in maximizing cost effectiveness. Sorry I wasted your time. I won't be repeating that error.

    ADD: Thank you for your feedback.
    Last edited by J.P.M.; 09-11-2017, 02:14 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • majorcuddles
    replied
    Originally posted by max2k

    with your current average consumption of 1,378 kWh/month and 1,000 kWh free you're paying for 378 kWh/month on average at $0.11/kWh meaning your total yearly bill without solar would be around $500 as I stated above. To be breakeven in 9 years your system cost must be $4,500 but you stated 9,800 kW with net price $1.51/Wh meaning you paid 9,800 x 1.51 = $14,798 Something doesn't add up by a factor of 3 for me.
    Goodness... You and J.P.M. are awfully fixated on this breakeven point. To both your points, I do have some non monetary objectives here. I also think your assumptions are a bit simplistic on how my current rate plan is structured. Here's my last 6 months of bills ($619).

    But moving along... I'm looking forward to the build out and learning as this progresses. Any thoughts other than poking holes at the assumed payback period? LOL
    (I'm not trying to be a total smartass here... all bidders had a payback period that ranged between 9-12 years... So I think it's more that I'm not conveying something effectively in the base scenario)

    Attached Files
    Last edited by solar pete; 09-11-2017, 12:06 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • max2k
    replied
    Originally posted by majorcuddles

    looks like breakeven will be around 8.5-9.5 years out at current consumption.

    Charging the Model X at home would change that payback period.
    with your current average consumption of 1,378 kWh/month and 1,000 kWh free you're paying for 378 kWh/month on average at $0.11/kWh meaning your total yearly bill without solar would be around $500 as I stated above. To be breakeven in 9 years your system cost must be $4,500 but you stated 9,800 kW with net price $1.51/Wh meaning you paid 9,800 x 1.51 = $14,798 Something doesn't add up by a factor of 3 for me.

    Charging your model X at home would improve this somewhat: at some assumed 30 miles 2-way trip with 0.4kWh/mile efficiency it would require 12 kWh/day extra again at $0.11 = $1.32/day or $481.8/year of extra electrical bill you'd incur if you were charging your model X at home without solar.

    If your system cost is $14,798 charging model X would shorten breakeven period from 30 years to 15: 14,798 / (500 + 481.8) = approx 15. The more you buy the more you save .

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    [QUOTE=majorcuddles;n360822]
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    looks like breakeven will be around 8.5-9.5 years out at current consumption.

    Charging the Model X at home would change that payback period.
    Well, even using the moron payback method and your numbers of ~ $0.07/kWh and $1.51/ STC Watt price, and a PVWatts est. of ~~1,500 kWh/yr. of production per installed STC kW:

    Each installed STC kW will produce: 1,500 kWh/yr. @~$0.07/kWh ~ = 1,500 kWh * $0.07/kWh = $105/yr.

    Each installed STC kW will cost you: $1.51/W * 1,000 W/kW = $ 1,510/installed STC kW.

    Moron payback method = installed initial cost/1st year annual saving.

    Using your numbers: $1,510/$105/yr. = ~ 14.4 years.


    I'm not sure I could conjure up discount rates, inflation rates, salvage (resale) rates and other things required for a more rigorous cost analysis to get to a nine year payback, but I'm ignorant of your particulars and it ain't my system.

    The system as you describe it, and going on incomplete information, may be sized about right, producing something close to 14,700 kWh/yr. or so to meet an ~1,378 *12 =15,536 kWh/yr. est. load, but will probably not meet much, if any of an additional EV load.

    Leave a comment:


  • majorcuddles
    replied
    [QUOTE=J.P.M.;n360814]
    Originally posted by majorcuddles

    I'm assuming/guess that "0.7/kWh" is meant as $0.07/kWh.

    That's pretty cheap. Especially, but depending on those fixed charges might be. Unless I'm missing something, I'd guess you're getting PV for reasons not related to any idea of cost effectiveness or financial breakeven any time soon.
    looks like breakeven will be around 8.5-9.5 years out at current consumption.

    Charging the Model X at home would change that payback period.

    Leave a comment:


  • max2k
    replied
    [QUOTE=J.P.M.;n360814]
    Originally posted by majorcuddles

    I'm assuming/guess that "0.7/kWh" is meant as $0.07/kWh.

    That's pretty cheap. Especially, but depending on those fixed charges might be. Unless I'm missing something, I'd guess you're getting PV for reasons not related to any idea of cost effectiveness or financial breakeven any time soon.
    can't be for financial reasons unless OP wants to sharply increase his consumption: his bill is roughly $500/year (378Wh x12 x 0.11) and out of pocket cost close to 15k so break even is around 30 years and I doubt equipment will last that long.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    [QUOTE=majorcuddles;n360811]
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    My current plan has some fixed charges, then first 1000 kWh are free, then $0.11/kWh. It's currently average of $0.7/kWh with monthly effective rates spread between .04 and .093
    I'm assuming/guess that "0.7/kWh" is meant as $0.07/kWh.

    That's pretty cheap. Especially, but depending on those fixed charges might be. Unless I'm missing something, I'd guess you're getting PV for reasons not related to any idea of cost effectiveness or financial breakeven any time soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • majorcuddles
    replied
    [QUOTE=J.P.M.;n360810]
    Originally posted by majorcuddles
    I'm aware that TX rates vary quite a bit. What do yours look like, highest/lowest ? Also, of the few POCOs that offer net metering, is yours one of them ?
    My current plan has some fixed charges, then first 1000 kWh are free, then $0.11/kWh. It's currently average of $0.7/kWh with monthly effective rates spread between .04 and .093

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    [QUOTE=majorcuddles;n360802]

    I've lived in this new construction home since December, so not enough time for a typical read yet.

    Average Usage: 1378kWh (949kWh - 1878kWh)
    Utility Rate Structures: Texas is deregulated so rates can wildly vary by term and source of power. Check out www.powertochoose.org to see more about Texas power rates

    Net Metering: Texas only has a few Retail Electric Providers which offer solar buyback: Green Mountain Energy, TXU Energy, Reliant, MP2

    Fed. tax credit is on bal. of sale after rebates, etc.

    I'm aware that TX rates vary quite a bit. What do yours look like, highest/lowest ? Also, of the few POCOs that offer net metering, is yours one of them ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...