X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    From Lead to Tin to produce flexible solar cells looks interesting

  • inetdog
    Super Moderator
    • May 2012
    • 9909

    #2
    Interesting, but miles away from commercial application.
    SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.

    Comment

    • SunEagle
      Super Moderator
      • Oct 2012
      • 15125

      #3
      I read an article that stated the DOE believes that by 2030 the cost of solar pv will be about $0.03/kWh for a Utility size system, $0.04/kWh for a commercial sized system and $0.05/kWh for home sized systems. Thus making solar a very low cost way to generate electrical power.

      The problem that was mentioned that even though the cost to generate electricity via solar would be very low it still would be only available 30% of the time which would make it still very costly to be used 24/7 through some form of storage process.

      So IMO and even the DOE the cost of solar pv cells can drop down to pennies but due to the limited time it can be used and the added cost of storing the energy it produces does not really make it a low cost electrical power source and will not create a "gold rush" of people to get it installed.

      Comment

      • Guest

        #4
        I beg to differ . I think supercapacitors will be a game changer in those time spans.
        https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1121162043.htm

        Supercaps are $5 for 500 farad 2.7V now! 6 in series will easily start your car
        Last edited by Guest; 11-23-2016, 06:29 AM.

        Comment

        • SunEagle
          Super Moderator
          • Oct 2012
          • 15125

          #5
          Originally posted by tytower
          I beg to differ . I think supercapacitors will be a game changer in those time spans.
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1121162043.htm

          Supercaps are $5 for 500 farad 2.7V now! 6 in series will easily start your car
          Caps are good for high discharge and short duration. Last time I looked useful sunlight on the best day was only 7 hours and the worst was maybe 2. So you would need some other form of energy source for 14 to 22 hours a day and sometimes 24 hours on days without any due to bad weather.

          That would require billions upon billions of capacitors discharging at staged intervals all day long. Please add that up at $5 / 500 farad and then get back to me on how much you think it will cost.

          Comment

          • Mike90250
            Moderator
            • May 2009
            • 16020

            #6
            only the top 10-20% of cap charge is usable for high power. Cars only need 10 seconds to crank. A cap battery replacement will not heat the glow plugs on my tractor and then crank it. A battery assisted by a cap could be useful.
            Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
            || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
            || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

            solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
            gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

            Comment

            • DanKegel
              Banned
              • Sep 2014
              • 2093

              #7
              Originally posted by Mike90250
              only the top 10-20% of cap charge is usable for high power..
              Even if you use a DC-DC converter designed to handle the supercap's steadily decreasing voltage during discharge?

              Comment

              • Mike90250
                Moderator
                • May 2009
                • 16020

                #8
                I'll admit. I've not looked for a DC-DC with an input of 15V - 3V and 1KW output @ 12V. i don't think it's feasible.
                Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
                || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
                || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

                solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
                gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

                Comment

                • Andygt02
                  Junior Member
                  • Dec 2015
                  • 36

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SunEagle
                  I read an article that stated the DOE believes that by 2030 the cost of solar pv will be about $0.03/kWh for a Utility size system, $0.04/kWh for a commercial sized system and $0.05/kWh for home sized systems. Thus making solar a very low cost way to generate electrical power.

                  The problem that was mentioned that even though the cost to generate electricity via solar would be very low it still would be only available 30% of the time which would make it still very costly to be used 24/7 through some form of storage process.

                  So IMO and even the DOE the cost of solar pv cells can drop down to pennies but due to the limited time it can be used and the added cost of storing the energy it produces does not really make it a low cost electrical power source and will not create a "gold rush" of people to get it installed.


                  At those prices it makes sense to oversize on a massive scale, to the point where even the cloudiest December days are producing more than enough power. Falling storage costs will take care of the rest - all we need is the political will and the production capacity. India has plans to be 100% renewable before 2050, but even if the products of world's solar and wind manufacturing was being installed in India every year, it's not enough. Not even close.
                  7.2 kW / LG NeOn 2 300's / Enphase M250

                  Comment

                  • DanKegel
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2014
                    • 2093

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mike90250
                    I'll admit. I've not looked for a DC-DC with an input of 15V - 3V and 1KW output @ 12V. i don't think it's feasible.
                    There are a number of papers about high power bidirectional dc-dc converters for supercapacitors,
                    so it's probably possible given enough engineering.
                    But I seem to recall the economics aren't really there for supercapacitors in high energy applications yet?
                    TI's got an application note http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slva726/slva726.pdf showing how to do it for tiny 15 watt applications.
                    If supercapacitors get better, I'm sure controllers would follow.
                    Last edited by DanKegel; 11-23-2016, 11:32 PM.

                    Comment

                    • PNjunction
                      Solar Fanatic
                      • Jul 2012
                      • 2179

                      #11
                      In regards to the article, it makes it appear that ALL panels produced today contain lead in the manufacturing process. Not so sure of that.

                      The simplest solution if that is a concern is to use Herasol silver-metallization paste which does not contain lead oxide.

                      The secondary question is that while tin based perovskite cells have advanced in efficiency, it appears that degradation still has to be tackled.

                      Like most solar breakthroughs, I see it as an investor pump, with a touch of environmental drama as the hook.

                      Comment

                      • inetdog
                        Super Moderator
                        • May 2012
                        • 9909

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PNjunction
                        In regards to the article, it makes it appear that ALL panels produced today contain lead in the manufacturing process. Not so sure of that.

                        The simplest solution if that is a concern is to use Herasol silver-metallization paste which does not contain lead oxide.

                        The secondary question is that while tin based perovskite cells have advanced in efficiency, it appears that degradation still has to be tackled.

                        Like most solar breakthroughs, I see it as an investor pump, with a touch of environmental drama as the hook.

                        The implication that all solar cells currently use lead in the manufacturing process is false and is probably not intended. Just the result of poor writing with an overly generalized headline.

                        To me it seems that the research deals entirely with replacing the lead perovskite with tin perovskite in cells which are NOT even in production yet for general use AFAIK.

                        Silicon based cells would use lead only in the tab soldering and possibly in the metalization for the electrodes, and as you note lead free metalization paste is available. And general purpose solder has been lead free for years.
                        SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.

                        Comment

                        • PNjunction
                          Solar Fanatic
                          • Jul 2012
                          • 2179

                          #13
                          I get it now. Yes, lead oxide and silver are part of the screen printing process that get the contact lines to stay stuck on the silicon.

                          But they want to do away with the minute amounts of lead, and also silver in that process and replace it with tin, which still needs help in regards to degradation.

                          Ok cool - bring it to market. But that doesn't guarantee global participation on the open market. That's the OTHER side of the story that financiers and investors will have to deal with. Real world.

                          I suppose the question is what amount of solar panel production equals the harm to the environment that comes from one idiot illegally dumping his lead acid automotive battery in the dump?

                          Obviously that should never happen. Entrepeneurs should set up solar-panel recycling centers when and IF the tin-based perovskite panels become feasable for 20 year timeframes.
                          Last edited by PNjunction; 11-23-2016, 09:22 PM.

                          Comment

                          • inetdog
                            Super Moderator
                            • May 2012
                            • 9909

                            #14
                            Originally posted by PNjunction
                            I get it now. Yes, lead oxide and silver are part of the screen printing process that get the contact lines to stay stuck on the silicon.

                            But they want to do away with the minute amounts of lead, and also silver in that process and replace it with tin, which still needs help in regards to degradation.
                            Funny, that is not how I read it. A sure sign that whichever is right it is poorly written.

                            I see it as saying that lead perovskites will be replaced as the active element with tin perovskites. Nothing to do with silicon cells at all.
                            SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.

                            Comment

                            • SunEagle
                              Super Moderator
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 15125

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Andygt02



                              At those prices it makes sense to oversize on a massive scale, to the point where even the cloudiest December days are producing more than enough power. Falling storage costs will take care of the rest - all we need is the political will and the production capacity. India has plans to be 100% renewable before 2050, but even if the products of world's solar and wind manufacturing was being installed in India every year, it's not enough. Not even close.
                              Unfortunately it isn't politics or money but physics. If you do the numbers of RE power generation, where it will work, how far it has to be transmitted, where it needs to be consumed, and how much that will be consumed, the numbers of 100% RE get harder and harder to reach.

                              Add on the fact of population growth along with the need to increase power consumption in a 3rd world nation to a growing industrialized nation and that goal of 100% RE goes out even farther.

                              The only way to reach it is to find a way to reduce the consumption through efficiency improvement and population reduction. Then some high % of RE may be reachable.

                              Comment

                              Working...