X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gstachura
    Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 70

    #1

    Quotes are in...survey says?

    EDIT...added Quote 4 and listed the companies w/ links

    My initial post on the intro page was that I was beginning the process of obtaining quotes for my Corona CA home (18° concrete tile roof). I've met with 6 different companies, obtained 10 different quotes of various panel/inverter brands, and have narrowed it down to three based on a number of criteria. Some were ruled out immediately as I knew more than their sales rep did and they were supposedly the professionals (I've only been researching for a month now). So here's the scoop, please let me know your opinions on what's been proposed.

    Quote 1 - Jamar Power Systems http://www.solarreviews.com/installe...stems-reviews/
    System size - 9.6 kW
    Panel - 32, LG 300N1C-B3 Black, 300 watt
    Inverter - 1, SolarEdge SE7600 w/ 32 SolarEdge P300 Optimizers
    Racking - Unirac or Iron Ridge
    Warranty - 10 yrs installation, 25 yrs on panel output
    Cash price before tax credit - $29,775
    Price per watt - $3.10
    Estimated annual production - 13,175 kWh per year
    Pros - lowest price per watt, LG panels rated very high, excellent contractor reviews
    Cons - warranty not as good as quote 2,

    Quote 2 - PetersenDean http://www.solarreviews.com/installe...nergy-reviews/
    System size - 9.52 kW
    Panel - 34, SolarWorld Sun Module Plus SW280 Black, 280 watt
    Inverter - SMA Sunny Boy (model not specified)
    Racking - Not specified
    Warranty - 30 yrs. installation, 30 yrs. kWh production, 25 yrs. on panel output
    Cash price before tax credit - $35,098 Lowered to $33,250
    Price per watt - $3.69 now $3.49
    Estimated annual production - 13,033 kWh per year
    Pros - best warranty, all USA made equipment, excellent contractor reviews
    Cons - higher price per watt

    Quote 3 - Triple Line Solar http://www.solarreviews.com/installe...solar-reviews/
    System size - 8.1 kW Upsized to 9.6 kW
    Panel - 32, LG 300N1C-A3 Black, 300 watt
    Inverter - 2, SMA Sunny Boy SB000TL-US-22
    Racking - Quick Mount
    Warranty - 10 years on installation, manufacturer's on equipment
    Cash price before tax credit - $32,750
    Price per watt - $3.82 now $3.41
    Estimated annual production - 12,082 kWh per year
    Pros - LG panels rated very high, excellent contractor reviews
    Cons - highest price per watt

    Quote 4 - LA Solar Group http://www.solarreviews.com/installe...group-reviews/
    System size - 9.6 kW
    Panel - 32, LG 300N1C-B3 Black, 300 watt
    Inverter - 1, SolarEdge SE7600 w/ 32 SolarEdge P300 Optimizers
    Racking - Iron Ridge
    Warranty - 20 yrs labor/installation, manufacturers warranty on equipment
    Cash price before tax credit - $29,088
    Price per watt - $3.03
    Estimated annual production - 14,120 kWh per year
    Pros - lowest price per watt, LG panels rated very high, excellent contractor reviews
    Cons - Only been in business for 3 years

    So there you have it. Thoughts??? Thanks in advance!
  • sensij
    Solar Fanatic
    • Sep 2014
    • 5074

    #2
    What is your estimated annual energy consumption?

    Also, where are the kWh estimates coming from?
    CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozx

    Comment

    • solarix
      Super Moderator
      • Apr 2015
      • 1415

      #3
      The problem with the 2nd two quotes using two inverters is that the combined output current is going to be more than code allows for backfeeding a 200A service. SMA makes a 7700W version which solves this problem but a 9.5kW array like the 2nd quote may be a little overpowering. Quote 3 using a single SB7700TL inverter should even be significantly cheaper.
      BSEE, R11, NABCEP, Chevy BoltEV, >3000kW installed

      Comment

      • Gstachura
        Member
        • Aug 2015
        • 70

        #4
        Originally posted by sensij
        What is your estimated annual energy consumption?

        Also, where are the kWh estimates coming from?
        My last 12 month average was 14,777 kWh. Annual production estimates are from the solar companies.

        Comment

        • sensij
          Solar Fanatic
          • Sep 2014
          • 5074

          #5
          Originally posted by Gstachura
          My last 12 month average was 14,777 kWh. Annual production estimates are from the solar companies.
          Your kWh estimates look low. Find out what azimuth and tilt your array will be, and check out PVWatts to generate your own estimate. Use premium panels, roof mount, 8-10% loss if the array will not regularly see shade. Read the documentation to understand what PVWatts is doing.

          You might be able to push for a smaller system at the $3.30-$3.50 / W price point . Take some time to understand how you are billed by your power company, and you might find that offsetting 100% or more is not as cost effective as offsetting some portion less than that.
          CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozx

          Comment

          • Gstachura
            Member
            • Aug 2015
            • 70

            #6
            Thanks for the info sensij. My roof pitch is 4:12 or 18° all the way around, with 16 panels on the 270° azimuth, 6 on the 180° and 10 on the 90° and very limited shading if any at all. In reviewing the quote again, the production estimate is from PV Watts but I'll run the numbers myself too.

            Comment

            • Gstachura
              Member
              • Aug 2015
              • 70

              #7
              So I ran the numbers on PV Watts. Unfortunately, PV watts does not let you choose multiple azimuths as my lay out would be (16 panels on the 270° azimuth, 6 on the 180° and 10 on the 90°). That being said, I ran a scenario for each azimuth and came up the following.

              270° - 13,864 kWh per year
              180° - 15,454 kWh per year
              90° - 13,407 kWh per year

              Average of all three, 14,241 kWh per year.

              I'm not sure if this is a good way to estimate production values but it does appear that the quote provided may be underestimated. But, is this done so that when the actual come in the company can say the system is exceeding expectations?

              Comment

              • thejq
                Solar Fanatic
                • Jul 2014
                • 599

                #8
                Originally posted by Gstachura
                So I ran the numbers on PV Watts. Unfortunately, PV watts does not let you choose multiple azimuths as my lay out would be (16 panels on the 270* azimuth, 6 on the 180* and 10 on the 90*). That being said, I ran a scenario for each azimuth and came up the following.

                270* - 13,864 kWh per year
                180* - 15,454 kWh per year
                90* - 13,407 kWh per year

                Average of all three, 14,241 kWh per year.

                I'm not sure if this is a good way to estimate production values but it does appear that the quote provided may be underestimated. But, is this done so that when the actual come in the company can say the system is exceeding expectations?
                You can take the pvwatt outputs divide by the number of panels for each az to get per panel output. Then multiple the panels for each az and sum to get the total. Also when running pvwatt, use 6% or 8% system loss (instead of the 14% default) to get a more accurate estimate. What did you use as tilt for your flat roof?
                16xLG300N1C+SE6000[url]http://tiny.cc/ojmxyx[/url]

                Comment

                • Gstachura
                  Member
                  • Aug 2015
                  • 70

                  #9
                  Originally posted by thejq
                  Then multiple the panels for each az and sum to get the total. What did you use as tilt for your flat roof?
                  Sorry but I'm not following this part of the equation. 4:12 pitch = 18° tilt.

                  Comment

                  • thejq
                    Solar Fanatic
                    • Jul 2014
                    • 599

                    #10
                    Sorry I meant to say, multiply the per panel output by the number of panels in each az and then sum to get the total output. Also when you said flat concrete roof, I thought, flat as in level (or zero degrees). Apparently you meant the tile itself is flat, and roof is tilted already. So never mind with the 2nd part of the question.
                    16xLG300N1C+SE6000[url]http://tiny.cc/ojmxyx[/url]

                    Comment

                    • Gstachura
                      Member
                      • Aug 2015
                      • 70

                      #11
                      I reran the numbers on PV Watts as suggested by thejq for each azimuth and came up with a total of 14,375 kWh per year versus the estimated annual production of quote 1 at 13,812. Not too far off and I suspect they used the PV Watts default settings rather than some of the adjustments I made for inverter efficiency, shading, etc. I also tend to think as mentioned before that they underestimate so when the system produces more they can show that as good marketing on how well the system they are selling performs.

                      With all that out of the way, does anyone have any thoughts on the quotes and systems themselves, pricing, etc. or am I missing anything? $3.28 per watt seems like a great deal from what I've been reading on this forum and the LG panels appear to rank very high performance-wise from what I've read.

                      Comment

                      • solar pete
                        Administrator
                        • May 2014
                        • 1840

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Gstachura
                        I reran the numbers on PV Watts as suggested by thejq for each azimuth and came up with a total of 14,375 kWh per year versus the estimated annual production of quote 1 at 13,812. Not too far off and I suspect they used the PV Watts default settings rather than some of the adjustments I made for inverter efficiency, shading, etc. I also tend to think as mentioned before that they underestimate so when the system produces more they can show that as good marketing on how well the system they are selling performs.

                        With all that out of the way, does anyone have any thoughts on the quotes and systems themselves, pricing, etc. or am I missing anything? $3.28 per watt seems like a great deal from what I've been reading on this forum and the LG panels appear to rank very high performance-wise from what I've read.
                        Sounds like you have done well from your time here and all your research, anything below $3.50 per watt seems like a good deal, cheers.
                        Last edited by solar pete; 09-09-2015, 02:08 AM. Reason: spelling

                        Comment

                        • thejq
                          Solar Fanatic
                          • Jul 2014
                          • 599

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Gstachura
                          I reran the numbers on PV Watts as suggested by thejq for each azimuth and came up with a total of 14,375 kWh per year versus the estimated annual production of quote 1 at 13,812. Not too far off and I suspect they used the PV Watts default settings rather than some of the adjustments I made for inverter efficiency, shading, etc. I also tend to think as mentioned before that they underestimate so when the system produces more they can show that as good marketing on how well the system they are selling performs.

                          With all that out of the way, does anyone have any thoughts on the quotes and systems themselves, pricing, etc. or am I missing anything? $3.28 per watt seems like a great deal from what I've been reading on this forum and the LG panels appear to rank very high performance-wise from what I've read.
                          Looks like you're going for 100% sizing. If you don't expect to increase your consumption in the future, you are probably going to leave $$$ on the table at true up time. FYI, all CA utilities charges minimum usage fees between $5-10/month right now. So if you average net consumption is less than that, you pay the minimum. If you're going for 100% sizing, you should at least subtract the minimum usage from the top line. If you can utilize some type of TOU to maximize production revenue by shifting your usage around, your sizing could be even less. Don't just look at the $/Watt price, proper sizing is more important (given a consumption level) for saving your money.
                          16xLG300N1C+SE6000[url]http://tiny.cc/ojmxyx[/url]

                          Comment

                          • Gstachura
                            Member
                            • Aug 2015
                            • 70

                            #14
                            Hmmm...I'm not necessarily looking to offset SCE by 100% for that very reason. Per the company quoting, that was also a reason to keep it a little under sized. If anything, my consumption may drop as I change out lighting to LED and replace my pool pump with a variable speed pump and I have no plans for an electric car at this time unless CA gas prices get stupidly high again.

                            Comment

                            • Tycron
                              Junior Member
                              • Aug 2015
                              • 6

                              #15
                              I'm also doing my research on going solar. I'm in southern Ca and I haven't been getting near the price you are being offered. Can you PM the companies you got the quotes from? Thanks in advance.

                              Comment

                              Working...