X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mb190e
    Solar Fanatic
    • May 2014
    • 167

    #1

    Solar panel fires!

    One of my Facebook friends started posting this stuff, now it's in the back of my mind.

    image.jpg

    image.jpg

    image.jpg

    A large fire occurred yesterday at Hove Town Hall caused by a faulty solar panel on the roof of the building. No-one was hurt. Locals have been quick to |




    This one is about 25 miles south of me. Article claims that the system was up and running for five years and then all of a sudden it caught on fire. Was using old technology DC on the roof, now they don't use that technology anymore they only use micro inverters which is AC all the way to the panel which is safer. WHAT??

  • SunEagle
    Super Moderator
    • Oct 2012
    • 15161

    #2
    Originally posted by Mb190e
    One of my Facebook friends started posting this stuff, now it's in the back of my mind.

    [ATTACH]6943[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH]6944[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH]6945[/ATTACH]

    A large fire occurred yesterday at Hove Town Hall caused by a faulty solar panel on the roof of the building. No-one was hurt. Locals have been quick to |




    This one is about 25 miles south of me. Article claims that the system was up and running for five years and then all of a sudden it caught on fire. Was using old technology DC on the roof, now they don't use that technology anymore they only use micro inverters which is AC all the way to the panel which is safer. WHAT??

    http://news10.com/2015/05/08/faulty-...ice-in-latham/
    When it comes to an electrical installation (AC or DC) the integrity of how is works and not causing a fire comes down to how it was installed and maintained.

    I have been exposed to quite a few DC powered equipment installations without ever seeing a fire cause by it being DC.

    My guess is that it wasn't necessarily the old DC technology that caused those fires but how the solar pv systems were installed which should have involved proper wire termination, proper wire size, over current protection, protection from environmental conditions and how good the protective maintenance plan was followed.

    Comment

    • thejq
      Solar Fanatic
      • Jul 2014
      • 599

      #3
      AC is definitely safer to work with. High voltage DC can create a static field around the wires. If not properly shielded, can cause arcs or sparks. Modern inverters has built-in arc detection (I know SolarEdge has it) that greatly reduces the chance of arcs, although not completely. IMO, it's one of the reason, some smaller (or less qualified) installer prefers micro-inverters over string or SE optimizers.
      16xLG300N1C+SE6000[url]http://tiny.cc/ojmxyx[/url]

      Comment

      • SunEagle
        Super Moderator
        • Oct 2012
        • 15161

        #4
        Originally posted by thejq
        AC is definitely safer to work with. High voltage DC can create a static field around the wires. If not properly shielded, can cause arcs or sparks. Modern inverters has built-in arc detection (I know SolarEdge has it) that greatly reduces the chance of arcs, although not completely. IMO, it's one of the reason, some smaller (or less qualified) installer prefers micro-inverters over string or SE optimizers.
        AC voltage generates a magnetic field also and can actually energize "dead" (not grounded) or De-energized wires running parallel along side the energized ones.

        High voltage AC can also generate pretty big arcs during the opening of energized switches depending on conditions.

        According to OSHA anything above 50V (AC or DC) can kill you. What makes it safe is how it is designed, installed and maintained. So AC is not really any safer to work with then DC above 50 volts.

        Comment

        • Mike90250
          Moderator
          • May 2009
          • 16020

          #5
          Originally posted by thejq
          AC is definitely safer to work with. High voltage DC can create a static field around the wires. If not properly shielded, can cause arcs or sparks. Modern inverters has built-in arc detection (I know SolarEdge has it) that greatly reduces the chance of arcs, although not completely. IMO, it's one of the reason, some smaller (or less qualified) installer prefers micro-inverters over string or SE optimizers.
          Until you have some science to back that up with, I call BS on it.
          High voltage DC can create a static field around the wires
          Wind can cause a static field around your glass windows. So ?

          Arc fault detection is for detecting bad wires/connectors, not static fields.

          Microinverters put lots of electronics on the roof, where it's not inspectable, and has lots of material to cook and burn.
          Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
          || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
          || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

          solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
          gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

          Comment

          • thejq
            Solar Fanatic
            • Jul 2014
            • 599

            #6
            Originally posted by SunEagle
            AC voltage generates a magnetic field also and can actually energize "dead" (not grounded) or De-energized wires running parallel along side the energized ones.

            High voltage AC can also generate pretty big arcs during the opening of energized switches depending on conditions.

            According to OSHA anything above 50V (AC or DC) can kill you. What makes it safe is how it is designed, installed and maintained. So AC is not really any safer to work with then DC above 50 volts.
            Magnetic field doesn't cause arcs. Yes, the closing/opening of switches can create an arc, but the mechanism is different from arcs caused by static charges. With DC, if the wire is not shield properly, charged particles will accumulate around the wire. With the right voltage and humidity, arc occurs to release the energy build-up.

            Yes, 50V AC or DC may be able kill you, but that's death by current not arc. How many times we read news that some dude gets hit by lightning that burns his hair and boots, but some how survived with just skin burns?

            Sure, the key to safety is proper installation and maintenance, I completely agree. For a qualified electrician, it's probably no different but for a less qualified one with substandard parts, AC is a safer choice.
            16xLG300N1C+SE6000[url]http://tiny.cc/ojmxyx[/url]

            Comment

            • thejq
              Solar Fanatic
              • Jul 2014
              • 599

              #7
              Originally posted by Mike90250
              Until you have some science to back that up with, I call BS on it.
              Science as in physics/electromagnetism? What do you like to know other than opposite charges attract?

              Originally posted by Mike90250
              Wind can cause a static field around your glass windows. So ?
              So you get zapped once a while. That little bright flash on the tip of your finger is called an arc.

              Originally posted by Mike90250
              Arc fault detection is for detecting bad wires/connectors, not static fields.
              Microinverters put lots of electronics on the roof, where it's not inspectable, and has lots of material to cook and burn.
              I'm not SE engineer, but from what I read, it detects both. I don't disagree with you on the shortcomings of micros. I got SE myself. But all I'm saying is that 240V AC is easier to work with than high voltage DC.
              16xLG300N1C+SE6000[url]http://tiny.cc/ojmxyx[/url]

              Comment

              • sensij
                Solar Fanatic
                • Sep 2014
                • 5074

                #8
                See the link below for a discussion the electric field outside of a current carrying conductor.

                Last edited by sensij; 06-04-2015, 03:25 AM. Reason: I made some mistakes here too...
                CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozx

                Comment

                • Sunking
                  Solar Fanatic
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 23301

                  #9
                  That is why electrical codes are getting tougher on Solar. Lots of fires.

                  First thing Firement do with a house fire with solar is get on the roof with a fire ax and smash all the panels with a fire ax. It is the only way to turn them off. That is why CA a electrical building codes requires setbacks on solar panels so fire fighters have enough room to walk around the roof and smash panels.

                  When Diets & Watson warehouse burned down in NJ, all the fire department could do is watch because the place was covered in solar panels. Not a complete loss, the Fire Fighters had free nice hot meals while they watched. Lots of BBQ on the house of course. .
                  MSEE, PE

                  Comment

                  • Mb190e
                    Solar Fanatic
                    • May 2014
                    • 167

                    #10
                    What kind of maintenance is there to do with the wires under the panels and in conduit all the way to the inverters? I thought solar panels and inverters were pretty much maintenance free.

                    Comment

                    • HX_Guy
                      Solar Fanatic
                      • Apr 2014
                      • 1002

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Mb190e
                      What kind of maintenance is there to do with the wires under the panels and in conduit all the way to the inverters? I thought solar panels and inverters were pretty much maintenance free.
                      They are pretty much maintenance free and I don't think these fire are so much a maintenance problem but a problem of incorrect installation in the first place...most probably having to do with bad connections I would guess.

                      Comment

                      • Sunking
                        Solar Fanatic
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 23301

                        #12
                        Originally posted by HX_Guy
                        They are pretty much maintenance free and I don't think these fire are so much a maintenance problem but a problem of incorrect installation in the first place...most probably having to do with bad connections I would guess.
                        Tree Rats. Bird's Nest, Sun Light UV and undocumented Roofer Installers that No Comprende
                        MSEE, PE

                        Comment

                        • Stopsignhank1
                          Junior Member
                          • May 2015
                          • 12

                          #13
                          Anybody actually read the article?

                          A spokesman for Brighton and Hove City Council said the Town Hall is currently undergoing renovations, and that consequently only a few staff and building contractors were inside at the time. They added that everyone was evacuated immediately with no casualties.
                          George Dalmon, who was in Hove Town Hall at the time of the fire told the Brighton Argus: “There was big black smoke billowing out, it looks quite major. Everyone has been evacuated out of the building. Somebody said something about it being a solar panel.”
                          So right now it is speculation that it was a solar panel. Maybe it was that plumber soldering the pipes together with a torch.

                          Comment

                          • Panelmal
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2014
                            • 39

                            #14
                            Hadn't even heard of this one thought it was going to be the one in Latham last month. That one was an old BP solar account that was taken on by solar city and was chewed on by squirrels apparently.


                            Edit: never mind your pictures deceived me it was that one. Squirrels did it. Was installing on a fire department that responded to it at the time.

                            Comment

                            • Sunking
                              Solar Fanatic
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 23301

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Stopsignhank1
                              So right now it is speculation that it was a solar panel. Maybe it was that plumber soldering the pipes together with a torch.
                              Last one who touches it, owns it and is responsible. If their pockets are not deep enough, the person before that. Someone has to be pay and it is not going to be the insurance company that holds the policy on the burnt building. They may pay initially, but they are going to go after whoever they can to get their money back if they can. Who ever has the deepest pockets looses. Unless of course it is a Jack Legged DIY install. Then the owner owns it.
                              MSEE, PE

                              Comment

                              Working...