X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • russ
    Solar Fanatic
    • Jul 2009
    • 10360

    #16
    Originally posted by oilerlord
    While B and C cells are typically naturally grown, silicone D cells are more impressive and less prone to sagging over time. Some say they also look better from street level and are more uniform in shape. Sorry about that, I should have made myself clear.
    Which has what connection with this thread?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Comment

    • Mb190e
      Solar Fanatic
      • May 2014
      • 167

      #17
      Originally posted by oilerlord
      While B and C cells are typically naturally grown, silicone D cells are more impressive and less prone to sagging over time. Some say they also look better from street level and are more uniform in shape. Sorry about that, I should have made myself clear.
      I don't think he taking about solar panels. Hahaha

      Comment

      • wrekless
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 6

        #18
        As titillating as this sidetracked conversation is, I am most concerned about what if any risks there are collecting rainwater from the panels that are about to go on my roof. I contacted my solar installer, and he said essentially the same thing that has been posted here already. He is contacting SunPower to see if they have any additional info.
        I spent about six months researching solar power prior to pulling the trigger. Read many post from these forums along the way. The rainwater contractor is obviously concerned about the quality of the water and he prefaced his comments with "if the panels are damaged or otherwise deteriorate to the point of leaking over time, you should be aware that potentially harmful chemicals could be collected along with the rainwater." That's why I posted here, to get opinions from those who have more experience with this than I do.

        Comment

        • russ
          Solar Fanatic
          • Jul 2009
          • 10360

          #19
          Originally posted by wrekless
          The rainwater contractor is obviously concerned about the quality of the water and he prefaced his comments with "if the panels are damaged or otherwise deteriorate to the point of leaking over time, you should be aware that potentially harmful chemicals could be collected along with the rainwater."
          Pray tell what is going to leak - the guy is just chattering where he has zero knowledge.
          [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

          Comment

          • SunEagle
            Super Moderator
            • Oct 2012
            • 15164

            #20
            Originally posted by wrekless
            As titillating as this sidetracked conversation is, I am most concerned about what if any risks there are collecting rainwater from the panels that are about to go on my roof. I contacted my solar installer, and he said essentially the same thing that has been posted here already. He is contacting SunPower to see if they have any additional info.
            I spent about six months researching solar power prior to pulling the trigger. Read many post from these forums along the way. The rainwater contractor is obviously concerned about the quality of the water and he prefaced his comments with "if the panels are damaged or otherwise deteriorate to the point of leaking over time, you should be aware that potentially harmful chemicals could be collected along with the rainwater." That's why I posted here, to get opinions from those who have more experience with this than I do.
            First I would assume that the rain water being collected is NOT for human consumption. It would need to be filtered and treated to make it Potable.

            Second, if it is for watering your vegetable garden then there could be an increase of pollutants from whats in the air and what is left on the roof. I don't believe water running off even exposed PV solar cells would add anything to worry about. In either case you should use some type of type of carbon filter to remove all airborne pollutants including heavy metals.

            If the water is just for lawn and shrubs I wouldn't worry much where it came from.

            Comment

            • wrekless
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2015
              • 6

              #21
              Originally posted by SunEagle
              First I would assume that the rain water being collected is NOT for human consumption. It would need to be filtered and treated to make it Potable.

              Second, if it is for watering your vegetable garden then there could be an increase of pollutants from whats in the air and what is left on the roof. I don't believe water running off even exposed PV solar cells would add anything to worry about. In either case you should use some type of type of carbon filter to remove all airborne pollutants including heavy metals.

              If the water is just for lawn and shrubs I wouldn't worry much where it came from.

              It is going to be potable, with appropriate filters and UV treatment.

              Comment

              • Mike90250
                Moderator
                • May 2009
                • 16020

                #22
                Originally posted by wrekless
                It is going to be potable, with appropriate filters and UV treatment.

                Anyone know of UV water treatment that used UV LED's instead of florescent tubes that take 2 minutes to warm up ?
                Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
                || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
                || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

                solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
                gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

                Comment

                • azdave
                  Moderator
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 791

                  #23
                  Originally posted by russ
                  - the guy is just chattering where he has zero knowledge.
                  I believe it's just a CYA move by the rainwater harvester because he doesn't know if it is a problem or not and doesn't want to take the liability of saying it should be okay.

                  I think you'll ingest or inhale far worse stuff from other sources (pesticides, airborne contaminants, etc) than what will ever come off your roof but what do I know?
                  Dave W. Gilbert AZ
                  6.63kW grid-tie owner

                  Comment

                  • SunEagle
                    Super Moderator
                    • Oct 2012
                    • 15164

                    #24
                    Originally posted by azdave
                    I believe it's just a CYA move by the rainwater harvester because he doesn't know if it is a problem or not and doesn't want to take the liability of saying it should be okay.

                    I think you'll ingest or inhale far worse stuff from other sources (pesticides, airborne contaminants, etc) than what will ever come off your roof but what do I know?
                    I agree.

                    I would expect the existing system to be able to "purify" the rain water from most pollutants through filters and possibly chemical addition already so whatever might come from the solar panels would be already covered.

                    Would need to see what the water system specification is and what contaminants it can capture.

                    Comment

                    • SunEagle
                      Super Moderator
                      • Oct 2012
                      • 15164

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Mike90250
                      Anyone know of UV water treatment that used UV LED's instead of florescent tubes that take 2 minutes to warm up ?
                      Mike

                      I have seen some LED's that can emit UV light between 365 - 410nm spectrum but do not know if they make a unit with the intensity to treat water.

                      Comment

                      • azdave
                        Moderator
                        • Oct 2014
                        • 791

                        #26
                        Originally posted by SunEagle
                        Mike

                        I have seen some LED's that can emit UV light between 365 - 410nm spectrum but do not know if they make a unit with the intensity to treat water.
                        They sure do.

                        Dave W. Gilbert AZ
                        6.63kW grid-tie owner

                        Comment

                        Working...