X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HX_Guy
    Solar Fanatic
    • Apr 2014
    • 1002

    #16
    So would you be in agreement that it would probably be best to not mess with the approved permit at this point and just do what's needed, and safe, to meet what the permit asks for? (would mean changing out the terminal blocks in the disconnect to accept 2AWG).

    Comment

    • sensij
      Solar Fanatic
      • Sep 2014
      • 5074

      #17
      Originally posted by HX_Guy

      If my calculation are correct, then 35.4ADC x 1.25 x 1.25 = 55.3A.
      6AWG conductor x .65 derate = 48.75A which is below the above number. Seems we would need 4AWG in that case, if the conduit were on the roof.
      This portion of the calculation may be where the city is misunderstanding. 2014 NEC made clearer that the optimizers are DC utilization equipment, and therefore only the connection from the module to the optimizer is the PV source circuit. There is no PV output circuit, because modules are not connected to each other. The extra 1.25 correction only applies to PV source and output circuits, and should not apply to the inverter input circuit in this case. However, this point was not clear in NEC 2011, and may be contributing to the requirement for 2 AWG (along with the mixed up temp corrections, and miscalculated amperage).
      CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozx

      Comment

      • Amy@altE
        Solar Fanatic
        • Nov 2014
        • 1023

        #18
        Wow. Guys, I am learning so much from this project. HX_Guy, I am sorry you're having so much trouble, but man oh man has this been a great learning experience. I'm so glad I joined this forum last year.
        Solar Queen
        altE Store

        Comment

        • russ
          Solar Fanatic
          • Jul 2009
          • 10360

          #19
          Originally posted by Amy@altE
          Wow. Guys, I am learning so much from this project. HX_Guy, I am sorry you're having so much trouble, but man oh man has this been a great learning experience. I'm so glad I joined this forum last year.
          Amy - We are glad you are here as well - your contribution has been great!
          [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

          Comment

          • sensij
            Solar Fanatic
            • Sep 2014
            • 5074

            #20
            Originally posted by Amy@altE
            Wow. Guys, I am learning so much from this project. HX_Guy, I am sorry you're having so much trouble, but man oh man has this been a great learning experience. I'm so glad I joined this forum last year.
            Yeah, no kidding. With regard to temperature correction, the designer of this system also referred to Table 310.15(B)(3)(c). That is created below, and explains how they might have tried to calculate the temp for the rooftop portion of the circuit relative to ambient:

            Adders.JPG

            It still doesn't quite add up... if 46 deg C was used as ambient, and the conduit in direct sunlight is 3.5" off the roof, the temp for the conduit should be 46 + 17 = 63. I'm not sure how to got two temps to land in the 46-50 range and 56-60 range using the code based corrections.
            CS6P-260P/SE3000 - http://tiny.cc/ed5ozx

            Comment

            Working...