Equal size systems produce the same annual output - initially and for some yrs. down the road. I'd suggest A more important efficiency to consider may be PRICE or COST efficiency, including the cost advantages gained by conservation efforts which can first of all lower the bill and then also reduce the optimum size system, thus making possible a less expensive panel with a lower area efficiency that will now fit on the smaller roof.
The lower yearly degradation of S.P. is acknowledged. It can and is being dealt with, but really needs a life cycle cost analysis to be done correctly, and is probably not amenable to blanket statements without gross oversimplification of the type necessary for this forum. One way to consider such matters is figuring out the "levelized cost of electricity". PITA, but it puts things on more or less equal footing, or can do so, depending on smoke/mirrors of perpetrators.
The lower yearly degradation of S.P. is acknowledged. It can and is being dealt with, but really needs a life cycle cost analysis to be done correctly, and is probably not amenable to blanket statements without gross oversimplification of the type necessary for this forum. One way to consider such matters is figuring out the "levelized cost of electricity". PITA, but it puts things on more or less equal footing, or can do so, depending on smoke/mirrors of perpetrators.
Comment