The fact that an on-grid solar system (is that the best term? It seems confusing) can "sell" power back to the grid (when there's a surplus) makes me wonder what the down-side would be to putting in a much larger system than your home requires. In learning about an on-grid solar system, I see myriad posts and instructions on precisely picking the exact-sized system for your home's needs. What is the down-side to putting in a system that would produce, say, TWICE your home's needs and selling the surplus back to the power company?
Obviously, the initial investment would be greater than a "perfectly" sized system for your needs but if the system more than pays for itself over it's ~30-year lifespan then doesn't it stand to reason that bigger = better in the long run?
In two years I will be building a home. Space and ability to clear shade-trees will not be an issue. I was wondering if a decent little investment in a larger solar system would be a good (long-term) supplemental income. For example, beyond my calculated home's needs, investing an extra $10,000, for example, in extra solar panels and a larger grid-tie inverter.
Thanks a lot for the great info.
Adam
Obviously, the initial investment would be greater than a "perfectly" sized system for your needs but if the system more than pays for itself over it's ~30-year lifespan then doesn't it stand to reason that bigger = better in the long run?
In two years I will be building a home. Space and ability to clear shade-trees will not be an issue. I was wondering if a decent little investment in a larger solar system would be a good (long-term) supplemental income. For example, beyond my calculated home's needs, investing an extra $10,000, for example, in extra solar panels and a larger grid-tie inverter.
Thanks a lot for the great info.
Adam
Comment