Advice for installing storage system

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RKCRLR
    replied
    I got my PG&E SGIP reservation letter today! I've scheduled the Powerwall install for June 10. Hopefully the system design is adequate or Tesla covers the overrun.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    Originally posted by RKCRLR

    As a followup, my application was resubmitted on 5/14 (Thursday). I've also noticed that the PG&E Equity Resiliency budget is down to less than $400K and they've changed the status from open to waitlist.
    Good luck. Maybe your original application will give your priority on the waitlist if that is where you end up.

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    I have a question about replacing the inverter on my old 4kW string system. There are no optimizers on it.
    Am I allowed to replace the inverter without complying with the rapid shutdown requirements? They were not in place when my system was installed (2009). I was thinking about going with a Sunny Boy 3.8US.

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    Originally posted by RKCRLR

    The Tesla guy that submits the SGIP applications agrees that he should be able to change the answer to Yes. I think he is working on the wordsmithing of the explanation.
    As a followup, my application was resubmitted on 5/14 (Thursday). I've also noticed that the PG&E Equity Resiliency budget is down to less than $400K and they've changed the status from open to waitlist.

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    Originally posted by Ampster
    What did Tesla say about modifying the application?
    The Tesla guy that submits the SGIP applications agrees that he should be able to change the answer to Yes. I think he is working on the wordsmithing of the explanation.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by RKCRLR
    Yes, I meant overcome by events. The question I asked them was related to a different system than the Powerwalls that I decided to go with.

    Just for grins I called and left them a another message (there is no option to speak to a live person). They never called me back the first time, I'll see if they call me back this time.
    Thank you for the response.

    Situations vary, but why wait ? I've found nothing can replace persistence. If I'm serious about getting an answer rather than simply an excuse for not resolving an issue, or I'm looking for a reason to bitch - which always feels better, to me anyway, than doing the often thankless and PITA work often needed for answers to move a project forward - and if I don't get a response, I begin working my way up the chain of command, always getting a name along the way. Sometimes that means starting anew using the phone number or email address shown on the outfit's website.

    While doing so I try to keep in mind that I'll attract more bees with honey than vinegar. Sometimes it's a balancing act.

    Getting the answer from whoever/whatever is authoritatively mandating the situation causing the question is usually the best, and in the end, usually the only answer that counts. In a sense, everything else is anecdotal to the task of getting an answer that moves the project forward, and sometimes less than helpful to resolution - including all my opinions.

    Take what you want of the above. Scrap the rest.


    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    What did Tesla say about modifying the application?

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    Yes, I meant overcome by events. The question I asked them was related to a different system than the Powerwalls that I decided to go with.

    Just for grins I called and left them a another message (there is no option to speak to a live person). They never called me back the first time, I'll see if they call me back this time.
    Last edited by RKCRLR; 05-14-2020, 11:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by RKCRLR

    I tried calling PG&E's SGIP telephone number at the beginning of the process and was never able to get through to a live person. I sent them an email and after a week tried calling PG&Es solar line to see if they could help. They said to expect 3 weeks for the PG&E SGIP representative to respond to an email. Sere enough, PG&E's SGIP representative responded after about 3 weeks but my original question was OBE. I don't want to go through this for this question, especially if it takes a few back and forths.
    Thank you. So, just to be clear in my own mind, the answer to my question is no ? That is, you called about a different matter early in the design process and got a tardy response so haven't asked about the current matter ? I'm not sure what "OBE" means. If it means "overcome by events", Are you saying the original question became irrelevant because the design or something else changed ?

    If so, or in any case, I'd start the process for this question. Based on what you write, sounds (reads) like the sooner you ask, the sooner you'll get an informed response. Who knows, you might get lucky with an early response. Even if a late response and contrary to what you've done subsequently, at least you'll a.) not be surprised if the design fails to conform on inspection or, b.) if not inspected yet, be able to change the design.

    For what is usually the small effort of a phone call/email, seems worth it to me to do so if for no other reason than covering my ass and being able to say, "I called and emailed you folks and never got a response - what was I supposed to do, stand around with tools in one hand and my best intentions in the other while I watch my bills increase and rebates decrease ? The clock is/was running, ya' know." Or something like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    I would bug Tesla to resubmit rather than wait for PG&E to respond. There is a clock running and you did mention that the available funds are running out. By the time PG&E responds, and then you resubmit.you may have missed your chance. Keep the communication open with PG&E in case my assumption is wrong so you can change it.

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    Did you call the approving body and ask them for clarification in the way of information and format with respect to isolation of critical loads, their identification and whether or not they are isolated ?

    I'd start with the body that is kicking back the application. Might save a lot of speculation. Besides, where's the harm ?
    I tried calling PG&E's SGIP telephone number at the beginning of the process and was never able to get through to a live person. I sent them an email and after a week tried calling PG&Es solar line to see if they could help. They said to expect 3 weeks for the PG&E SGIP representative to respond to an email. Sere enough, PG&E's SGIP representative responded after about 3 weeks but my original question was OBE. I don't want to go through this for this question, especially if it takes a few back and forths.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by RKCRLR
    I've hit a little bit of a snag in my SGIP Residential Equity Resiliency incentive application. My application has been kicked back because the answer to "Indicate whether the project’s critical loads can and will be isolated" (customer attestation question #2) was no. The comment is "Please be advised that the inability to isolate critical loads is not SGIP approved." Interestingly, I didn't see anything in the 2020 workbook that required critical loads to be isolated, just that it needed to be identified whether or not they were isolated.
    Does anyone know the SGIP definition of critical loads vs non-critical loads? In my current configuration my house won't have a separate critical loads panel but my shop will isolated and not backed up.
    Thanks
    Did you call the approving body and ask them for clarification in the way of information and format with respect to isolation of critical loads, their identification and whether or not they are isolated ?

    I'd start with the body that is kicking back the application. Might save a lot of speculation. Besides, where's the harm ?

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    ^^^^
    Thanks. I did manage to talk to a Tesla design guy and he believes the answer is yes also. I've request that the guy that does the SGIP applications and the design guy have a discussion and let me know the results.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    Originally posted by RKCRLR
    .......
    Does anyone know the SGIP definition of critical loads vs non-critical loads? In my current configuration my house won't have a separate critical loads panel but my shop will isolated and not backed up.
    Thanks
    No, I don't. I think the operative term is critical and I think there is a broad range of interpretation. If I remember your pump was the critical load that qualified you for that program. I would change the answer to yes and explain that the pump and some household loads are on a panel that is backed up and that the shop is not. Give them a long list of the loads that are not backed up and that might satisfy them. At least the good news is Tesla got the application submitted. I have been following this on both forums but not consistently. Good luck.

    Leave a comment:


  • RKCRLR
    replied
    I've hit a little bit of a snag in my SGIP Residential Equity Resiliency incentive application. My application has been kicked back because the answer to "Indicate whether the project’s critical loads can and will be isolated" (customer attestation question #2) was no. The comment is "Please be advised that the inability to isolate critical loads is not SGIP approved." Interestingly, I didn't see anything in the 2020 workbook that required critical loads to be isolated, just that it needed to be identified whether or not they were isolated.
    Does anyone know the SGIP definition of critical loads vs non-critical loads? In my current configuration my house won't have a separate critical loads panel but my shop will isolated and not backed up.
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:

Working...