I have 2 CCs
They both measure the voltage.
The inverter also measures the voltage.
The CC's have more or less the same reading but the Victron inverter reading is higher.
I must get a hydrometer and learn how to use it.
I am planning to have a section on my solar set up on my blog with photos.
The batteries ccs and inverter are all close together in one room.
One of the problems with system design is that a big decision is the choice of batteries.
If properly treated the batteries may last 5 years.
But in 5 years their use may change.
This is my case:
When I bought my batteries my mountain house was only used for weekends.
I like it so much up here that I now spend a lot of time here. From March - November this year I have been here permanently, 100% off grid.
The choice of batteries was made by an installer.
At this time I did not understand anything about batteries or solar systems so I had to go along with what my "expert" thought best.
It probably was the right amount of battery for my usage at the time.
The big difference between my conception of a good system and other people on this thread and also books I have read is that other people believe that
the batteries should be able to withstand 5 days of no sun whereas I would be happy with 1 day.
Maybe the reason I believe this is because I live in Andalucia Spain which has a very high amount of sunlight hours and 3 days without sun happens very infrequently. Also if there is no sun it is possible to quickly minimise electricity use to a minimum.
Just 1 or 2 laptops and a 6 watt router so maybe 90 watts.
The generator I have is the smallest you can buy.
It has a 450 or 900 watt setting.
On the 450 watt setting it will go for a lot of hours for maybe 3 euros.
Even on a cloudy day the panels take in 150 watts.
These are the reasons why my batteries are still OK.
In my opinion, in solar systems, in life in general and in the words of Mr Micawber (a Charles Dickens character)
You are OK if your income is more that your outgoing.
Mr Micawber
"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen pounds nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."
In the case of a solar system you have to take some inefficiency into the equation.
With a solar system:
If your big expenditure happens at times of maximum income and at times when there is no income the expenditure is low and you have enough flexibility to vary the expenditure then you are more likely to be happy with the system.
Here is some more info on my system.
The CC s are PWM
I have a 24 volt system
I have 12 of the following batteries
Classic 5 OPzS 380 2v Solar Liquid Cell
Voltage: 2V
Capacity: 380Ah @ c120
I mainly chose to have a 1200 watt system because SUNKING (from this forum) said I would need 1200 watts charging power for my batteries.
(I hope that SUNKING knows what he is talking about because I have trusted his figures.)
See post
I now have 2 charge controllers.
One with 250 watts of panels the other has 950 watts.
They both measure the voltage.
The inverter also measures the voltage.
The CC's have more or less the same reading but the Victron inverter reading is higher.
I must get a hydrometer and learn how to use it.
I am planning to have a section on my solar set up on my blog with photos.
The batteries ccs and inverter are all close together in one room.
One of the problems with system design is that a big decision is the choice of batteries.
If properly treated the batteries may last 5 years.
But in 5 years their use may change.
This is my case:
When I bought my batteries my mountain house was only used for weekends.
I like it so much up here that I now spend a lot of time here. From March - November this year I have been here permanently, 100% off grid.
The choice of batteries was made by an installer.
At this time I did not understand anything about batteries or solar systems so I had to go along with what my "expert" thought best.
It probably was the right amount of battery for my usage at the time.
The big difference between my conception of a good system and other people on this thread and also books I have read is that other people believe that
the batteries should be able to withstand 5 days of no sun whereas I would be happy with 1 day.
Maybe the reason I believe this is because I live in Andalucia Spain which has a very high amount of sunlight hours and 3 days without sun happens very infrequently. Also if there is no sun it is possible to quickly minimise electricity use to a minimum.
Just 1 or 2 laptops and a 6 watt router so maybe 90 watts.
The generator I have is the smallest you can buy.
It has a 450 or 900 watt setting.
On the 450 watt setting it will go for a lot of hours for maybe 3 euros.
Even on a cloudy day the panels take in 150 watts.
These are the reasons why my batteries are still OK.
In my opinion, in solar systems, in life in general and in the words of Mr Micawber (a Charles Dickens character)
You are OK if your income is more that your outgoing.
Mr Micawber
"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen pounds nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."
In the case of a solar system you have to take some inefficiency into the equation.
With a solar system:
If your big expenditure happens at times of maximum income and at times when there is no income the expenditure is low and you have enough flexibility to vary the expenditure then you are more likely to be happy with the system.
Here is some more info on my system.
The CC s are PWM
I have a 24 volt system
I have 12 of the following batteries
Classic 5 OPzS 380 2v Solar Liquid Cell
Voltage: 2V
Capacity: 380Ah @ c120
I mainly chose to have a 1200 watt system because SUNKING (from this forum) said I would need 1200 watts charging power for my batteries.
(I hope that SUNKING knows what he is talking about because I have trusted his figures.)
See post
I now have 2 charge controllers.
One with 250 watts of panels the other has 950 watts.
Comment