Just a warning for anyone on 24V systems about feature support - and also, I suppose, a commentary on what I keep reading is a company with 'great tech support'.
I purchased an MS4024 a few years back for an offgrid property. Works great. This year, I turned out to have an *occasional* need for 120/240AC - and my MS4024 is *not* a PAE model, so it only does 120.
But a bit of research -- right here on the Magnum site, shows me this : https://www.magnum-dimensions.com/se...king-interface
Its right in the list of accessories. So I downloaded the manual and install instructions. Same for the current manuals for the MS4024, MPSL-60S, MP-D backplate, MPXS extension module, ME-ARC remote.. Informed purchasing. Bought all the equipment and necessary upgrades... --another MS4024, and added in an MPSL-60S, MPXS extension module, a Backplate, and an additional ME-ARC......
.
Got it all installed. Connected up the cables as indicated in the manuals - the remote throws a 'Stack Clock Fault' error. No amount of resetting or following the manuals fixes this - and the inverters shut off when it happens. (Ok, i appreciate the safety mechanism - but what do I do NOW?)
When I get a response from Magnum support, it is basically this: 'We removed support from this stacking feature in Rev. 6.0 of the MS4024 inverters. No, we realize we didn't update that information on the website or in any of the current manuals, nor is there a bulletin posted'. The tech can offer me no suggestions on workarounds. No offer to or willingness to change out my 6.0 control board for a 5.5 or 5.4 rev which still has the feature. Quite literally, the end of my response from Magnum tech support is:
"The MS4024 is only a 120 VAC inverter/charger. The inverter you needed was the MS4024PAE which is stackable and is a 120/240 VAC inverter charger. Sorry about the bad news."
That's actually a cut-paste. I asked if they would exchange, or sell, a functional control board - no response *at all*. Just silence. Also the tech seems *unaware* that for over a decade, you could series-stack MS4024 units, that *two* of them will share a neutral with a stack cable and provide 240. (in fact, this seems to be the ONLY purpose for the red-labelled stack port on the MS series of inverters).
You know, I read a lot about how awesome tech support is at Magnum. I like the equipment - but as you can imagine, I'm not impressed.
I'm particularly not impressed that the ME-SSI is still listed on their site as a series-stacking option, and the *currently downloadable* manual for the MS4024 still indicates that series stacking is a feature. My choice per Magnum is 'Buy MS4024PAE units'. It's a bit late now.... selling a pair of MS4024s with the primary feature that you would buy two for *disabled in firmware* is a huge loss.
I'm furious, admittedly -- but also annoyed that now - as I can afford to because these 'high quality inverter' systems aren't cheap - I"m going to have to move to another manufacturer. I certainly won't invest more money in Magnum equipment after having had this happen.
(and of course, I have no real recourse, because I'm in Canada, and Magnum isn't.)
I purchased an MS4024 a few years back for an offgrid property. Works great. This year, I turned out to have an *occasional* need for 120/240AC - and my MS4024 is *not* a PAE model, so it only does 120.
But a bit of research -- right here on the Magnum site, shows me this : https://www.magnum-dimensions.com/se...king-interface
Its right in the list of accessories. So I downloaded the manual and install instructions. Same for the current manuals for the MS4024, MPSL-60S, MP-D backplate, MPXS extension module, ME-ARC remote.. Informed purchasing. Bought all the equipment and necessary upgrades... --another MS4024, and added in an MPSL-60S, MPXS extension module, a Backplate, and an additional ME-ARC......
.
Got it all installed. Connected up the cables as indicated in the manuals - the remote throws a 'Stack Clock Fault' error. No amount of resetting or following the manuals fixes this - and the inverters shut off when it happens. (Ok, i appreciate the safety mechanism - but what do I do NOW?)
When I get a response from Magnum support, it is basically this: 'We removed support from this stacking feature in Rev. 6.0 of the MS4024 inverters. No, we realize we didn't update that information on the website or in any of the current manuals, nor is there a bulletin posted'. The tech can offer me no suggestions on workarounds. No offer to or willingness to change out my 6.0 control board for a 5.5 or 5.4 rev which still has the feature. Quite literally, the end of my response from Magnum tech support is:
"The MS4024 is only a 120 VAC inverter/charger. The inverter you needed was the MS4024PAE which is stackable and is a 120/240 VAC inverter charger. Sorry about the bad news."
That's actually a cut-paste. I asked if they would exchange, or sell, a functional control board - no response *at all*. Just silence. Also the tech seems *unaware* that for over a decade, you could series-stack MS4024 units, that *two* of them will share a neutral with a stack cable and provide 240. (in fact, this seems to be the ONLY purpose for the red-labelled stack port on the MS series of inverters).
You know, I read a lot about how awesome tech support is at Magnum. I like the equipment - but as you can imagine, I'm not impressed.
I'm particularly not impressed that the ME-SSI is still listed on their site as a series-stacking option, and the *currently downloadable* manual for the MS4024 still indicates that series stacking is a feature. My choice per Magnum is 'Buy MS4024PAE units'. It's a bit late now.... selling a pair of MS4024s with the primary feature that you would buy two for *disabled in firmware* is a huge loss.
I'm furious, admittedly -- but also annoyed that now - as I can afford to because these 'high quality inverter' systems aren't cheap - I"m going to have to move to another manufacturer. I certainly won't invest more money in Magnum equipment after having had this happen.
(and of course, I have no real recourse, because I'm in Canada, and Magnum isn't.)
Comment