LG RESU10H systems recalled

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • foo1bar
    Solar Fanatic
    • Aug 2014
    • 1833

    #1

    LG RESU10H systems recalled

    "Name of product:
    LG Chem “RESU10H” Lithium-Ion Residential Energy Storage System Batteries

    Hazard:
    The home batteries can overheat, posing a risk of fire and emission of harmful smoke.":



    This recall:
    The serial number of the recalled product begins with R15563P3

    Previous recall:
    The serial number of the recalled product begins with R15563P3SSEG
  • robbyg
    Member
    • Apr 2021
    • 93

    #2
    LG is not having a lot of luck with that battery system.

    Comment

    • Mike90250
      Moderator
      • May 2009
      • 16020

      #3
      Not just LG, Tesla too.



      There's a learning curve ! Just like with steam boilers

      Smoke billows from a fire at Victoria’s new Tesla Big Battery

      TeslaMegapackFire_8-2021.jpg

      Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
      || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
      || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

      solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
      gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

      Comment

      • J.P.M.
        Solar Fanatic
        • Aug 2013
        • 15038

        #4
        Originally posted by Mike90250
        There's a learning curve ! Just like with steam boilers
        Historic factoid FWIW: The A.S.M.E. was founded in 1880 but got its true sea legs and a major boost in 1905 as a result of the perceived need to develop boiler design technology and statutes with the goal of reducing the increasing number of boiler explosions occurring on as a result of rapid industrialization at that time.

        Even if the will to do so existed today, I doubt such an effort could be made to deal with the upcoming surge and interest in energy storage technology.

        Comment

        • solardreamer
          Solar Fanatic
          • May 2015
          • 473

          #5
          This kind of problems will likely cause more AHJ's to require home battery systems to be located away from the home structure. It never made much sense to me why large battery systems would be installed in attached garages that can easily get very hot in many regions.

          Comment

          • peakbagger
            Solar Fanatic
            • Jun 2010
            • 1566

            #6
            I have been involved with a Tesla commercial installation and our firm has assisted on another Tesla Commercial project and a co worker was PM for another Tesla Commercial installation. In all cases the local Fire departments were poorly educated early on in the projects and as they learn more they are far more cautious. about allowing them to be installed.

            One major issue is Tesla reportedly has zero recommendations on how to make the smouldering remnants of a battery safe. The FD approach is apparently protect surrounding buildings and just flood the battery for several days until its at ambient. The problem is Tesla reportedly has no interest in being involved with the dismantling, cleanup and disposal. My guess is it goes into Hazmat barrels and shipped to some Hazmat landfill at hefty cost.

            Comment

            • robbyg
              Member
              • Apr 2021
              • 93

              #7
              Originally posted by solardreamer
              This kind of problems will likely cause more AHJ's to require home battery systems to be located away from the home structure. It never made much sense to me why large battery systems would be installed in attached garages that can easily get very hot in many regions.
              I honestly don't know how people sleep well at night with systems like that. One of my first criteria when designing my system was that it had to be away from my house and be enclosed in a reinforced concrete room. If my baby goes up in flames it should be contained to that one electrical room. I said "should" because you just never know with 100% certainty what will happen.

              Comment

              • Ampster
                Solar Fanatic
                • Jun 2017
                • 3658

                #8
                Originally posted by robbyg

                I honestly don't know how people sleep well at night with systems like that...........
                For several years I had a system powered by a used Nissan Leaf pack. I slept well at night because I had a robust BMS and monitoring system that reduced the risk of fire. I understand that a BMS cannot prevent or put out a fire but I was confident that if the pack was used within conservative settings the risk of a runaway module was reduced.

                Two years ago, when I was considering significantly increasing the size of the pack, I switched to LFP chemistry which is inherently more safe than the Cobalt Manganese ingredients of the Nissan Leaf, LG Chem and Tesla modules and batteries.
                EDIT: I still use a BMS and understand that it will just give me info about the health of my pack including temperatures of different sections of the pack. I am primarily relying on the relative safety of LFP cells compared to LMNC.
                Last edited by Ampster; 09-06-2021, 02:21 PM. Reason: Add Caveat
                9 kW solar, 42kWh LFP storage. EV owner since 2012

                Comment

                • robbyg
                  Member
                  • Apr 2021
                  • 93

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ampster
                  For several years I had a system powered by a used Nissan Leaf pack. I slept well at night because I had a robust BMS and monitoring system that reduced the risk of fire. I understand that a BMS cannot prevent or put out a fire but I was confident that if the pack was used within conservative settings the risk of a runaway module was reduced.

                  Two years ago, when I was considering significantly increasing the size of the pack, I switched to LFP chemistry which is inherently more safe than the Cobalt Manganese ingredients of the Nissan Leaf, LG Chem and Tesla modules and batteries.
                  So long as people understand that not even a good BMS is going to save you if a cell decides to go south then I guess it's up to them. Personally I am not willing to take the chance with batteries in or next to my house or garage, not even FLP which I trust a 1000% more than LI.
                  Going LFP was the main reason I chose Fortress batteries over LG.
                  Last edited by robbyg; 08-29-2021, 09:00 PM.

                  Comment

                  • scrambler
                    Solar Fanatic
                    • Mar 2019
                    • 503

                    #10
                    What about the container inside which the battery is placed?
                    My 11kWh Panasonic solar battery is inside a large heavy steel box. I am wondering if that would contain the fire, or if the box would be blown to pieces...
                    I cant find much information on Lithium battery containers and what they can resist.

                    Comment

                    • Mike90250
                      Moderator
                      • May 2009
                      • 16020

                      #11
                      Originally posted by scrambler
                      What about the container inside which the battery is placed?
                      My 11kWh Panasonic solar battery is inside a large heavy steel box. I am wondering if that would contain the fire, or if the box would be blown to pieces...
                      I cant find much information on Lithium battery containers and what they can resist.
                      It takes a very heavy / strong container to contain a Li battery fire. It's very hot, toxic, and you basically wait hours for it to burn out.
                      I doubt a GI ammo can is strong enough to resist a Li fire if it was only half full of batteries.
                      Fires started by lighting a Li battery on fire externally are not really battery fires. When the battery has an internal flaw, cooks for hours and then goes boom,
                      those are the hard to put out fires.
                      Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
                      || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
                      || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

                      solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
                      gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

                      Comment

                      Working...