Hello, 
Thought I'd take a survey. I'm planning out a ground mount racking system for 18 panels in portrait (6 columns and 3 rows, due to space constraints) and am currently looking at Cooper B-Line strut. Pre-Galvanized and Dura-Green are roughly the same price from my supplier, coming in at around $800 for the channel pieces alone. Hot Dipped Galvanized is more than double the price, coming in at around $1700 for the channel alone. I'd like for the racking system to last roughly as long as the panels themselves. I live in a rural, mountainous area, and away from salt water. Are folks having good success with Pre-Galvanized or Dura-Green strut in this environment? There's not much info out there on the internet directly comparing Dura-Green to Pre-Galvanized, but one document I found from Unistrut indicated that Pre-Galvanized was a step up from their similar "Perma-Green III" finish when it comes to corrosive environments.
Any input is appreciated. Thanks!
					Thought I'd take a survey. I'm planning out a ground mount racking system for 18 panels in portrait (6 columns and 3 rows, due to space constraints) and am currently looking at Cooper B-Line strut. Pre-Galvanized and Dura-Green are roughly the same price from my supplier, coming in at around $800 for the channel pieces alone. Hot Dipped Galvanized is more than double the price, coming in at around $1700 for the channel alone. I'd like for the racking system to last roughly as long as the panels themselves. I live in a rural, mountainous area, and away from salt water. Are folks having good success with Pre-Galvanized or Dura-Green strut in this environment? There's not much info out there on the internet directly comparing Dura-Green to Pre-Galvanized, but one document I found from Unistrut indicated that Pre-Galvanized was a step up from their similar "Perma-Green III" finish when it comes to corrosive environments.
Any input is appreciated. Thanks!
 . Its close cousin is "formula H", the taller a cross section can be the more load it can take although the key thing is that the strength is only when its directly in line with the height. Lateral bracing definitely has to be in place or bad things happen. Its obviously not that simple as someone has to be aware of the potential loads before they can try to account for them. Static loading is usually easy but dynamic loads like wind uplift are a lot tougher. I am not a structural engineer so I can get the static loads covered but dynamic loads are a whole other story.
. Its close cousin is "formula H", the taller a cross section can be the more load it can take although the key thing is that the strength is only when its directly in line with the height. Lateral bracing definitely has to be in place or bad things happen. Its obviously not that simple as someone has to be aware of the potential loads before they can try to account for them. Static loading is usually easy but dynamic loads like wind uplift are a lot tougher. I am not a structural engineer so I can get the static loads covered but dynamic loads are a whole other story. 
Comment