Russ - perhaps faith is not the best choice of words -- perhaps I should have said confidence .. I have confidence in Enphase .. they just opened a facility here in Ontario to manufacture for the Canadian Market .. now I think I can say that is either faith or confidence or a commitment. .. It's also too bad we have to adopt an attitude of plausible denial about every thing or figure out an excuse in advance of a problem... SO ..for example ! why not be honest and admit you had problems with the BLOW OUT PREVENTOR and make sure it doesn't happen again ! now that's engineering.
Try our solar cost and savings calculator
single inverters vs micro-inverters
Collapse
X
-
-
@coffeepodman - Greetings and for your information İ live in neither the US or the UK. The BOP problem you manage to sneak in is a BP problem which last İ heard stands for British Petroleum. Probably not an engineering problem really but a management problem in drilling where they should have never gone - too deep when the technology doesn't exist to support the program.
Ontario will still be paying for the trip into fantasy land on RE when your grandkids have to foot the bill. Enjoy! The FİT is far too high to be sustainable and these companies showed up due to guarantees on things like no taxes for many years? free or cheap land? and many other assurances/guarantees.
İ see no big rush to accept a new technology based on a companies words. Those words will, almost certainly, be self serving and not necessairly have anything to do with the truth.
Enphase may work out fine time will tell.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
No Taxes ?
The Ontario Government has not promised anything like free land or no taxes ... actually they will gain ..the risk will be born by the producer and the power authority will benefit by not having to put in place so much expensive infrastructure ... that's why they are giving 80.2 cents per kW !
The pay back on a Tracker System is 5.5 years with the contract for 20 ... better than a GIC or stocks ( little risk) and the banks are chomping at the bit to lend against a contract from OPA / Ontario Hydro.
The Ontario Content restrictions bring Jobs to Ontario and discourage import of off shore product. Some think that's a good idea.Comment
-
Could be but İ expect that if you know the deals details you would learn different.
All big companies are looking for their own incentives when they locate a major facility - this time is no different and certainly other locations would be offering deals.
İn the present economic difficulties and with states/provinces wanting job creation landing a big one like Ontario has is not cheap or easy.
The local content part is causing a bit of a problem for guys İ know. That will get sorted out in a sort time no doubt but installers are learning what all is not locally available.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
we are getting off the thread
Before we get back on the thread ... perhaps it's prudent to remind our readers that the OPA contract of 80.2 cents per kW is only for now and until the end of 2011 .... any one care to speculate what it will be offered at in 2012 ?
If the world doesn't come to an end ... thank you Mayan'sComment
-
NABCEP certified Technical Sales Professional
[URL="http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?5334-Solar-Off-Grid-Battery-Design"]http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...Battery-Design[/URL]
[URL]http://www.calculator.net/voltage-drop-calculator.html[/URL] (Voltage drop Calculator among others)
[URL="http://www.gaisma.com"]www.gaisma.com[/URL]Comment
-
While the article was written by KACO with some bias, I tend to agree with most of the opinions. Micro inverters have their place with shading, odd tilt and direction orientation, and mixed panels issues, but when it comes to cost and high failure rates it just does not add up for most applications.MSEE, PEComment
-
Do you have documentation on the high failure rates?
We've installed hundreds and had one failure and that was on start up so it was a defective unit from the factory not a failure per se.
As far as cost goes pretty much anything below 2KW is more cost efficient with the micro inverters. I would have to be above 5 KW before the cost tips substantially in favor of the string. Add in a sunny portal or other monitoring system and the margin becomes even smaller.
That said we do not use 185W modules, standard module is in the 220-240W range. Enphase cost me about $150.00 each That puts the inverter cost around $.65 a watt.
In many jurisdictions it also allows me to run romex through the house instead of pipe down the oustide which reduces installation costs.
As I alluded to in another thread we also have problems with trees different directions etc on our installations. It also does not get as hot here as in Texas so over heating is not as much of an issue for us as it might be for you.NABCEP certified Technical Sales Professional
[URL="http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?5334-Solar-Off-Grid-Battery-Design"]http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...Battery-Design[/URL]
[URL]http://www.calculator.net/voltage-drop-calculator.html[/URL] (Voltage drop Calculator among others)
[URL="http://www.gaisma.com"]www.gaisma.com[/URL]Comment
-
Is the information on Wikipedia about microinverters accurate?
Comment
-
The MD Public Service Commission gave me a higher derate factor for having micros, which translates into higher harvest estimates, which, in turn, translates into more SRECs/year that I can sell. It's a modest difference, but it adds up over 15 years.SHF produces something besides manure!Comment
-
Is the information on Wikipedia about microinverters accurate?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_micro-inverter
Microinverters have several advantages over conventional devices; they eliminate high voltage DC runs, reduce line losses, individually control the panels output and act as maximum power point trackers, and introduce redundancy to the array.
Their primary disadvantages are that they are generally more expensive than the equivalent string inverter, and are normally located on the panel, where they may be harder to maintain.
and the rest of it is pretty good too. I still don't like them for installs in good conditions, but for solving a problem in marginal installs, they work.Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
|| Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
|| VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A
solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-ListerComment
-
This part is:
Microinverters have several advantages over conventional devices; they eliminate high voltage DC runs, reduce line losses, individually control the panels output and act as maximum power point trackers, and introduce redundancy to the array.
Their primary disadvantages are that they are generally more expensive than the equivalent string inverter, and are normally located on the panel, where they may be harder to maintain.
and the rest of it is pretty good too. I still don't like them for installs in good conditions, but for solving a problem in marginal installs, they work.MSEE, PEComment
-
There is one minor flaw in your logic. You are assuming SREC will last that long.MSEE, PEComment
-
However the flaw in YOUR logic is you have discounted the savings due to added generation. SREC's or not I have seen an average of 5-7% increased harvest using the micro's above the PV Watts prediction which is used to certify his system.NABCEP certified Technical Sales Professional
[URL="http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?5334-Solar-Off-Grid-Battery-Design"]http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...Battery-Design[/URL]
[URL]http://www.calculator.net/voltage-drop-calculator.html[/URL] (Voltage drop Calculator among others)
[URL="http://www.gaisma.com"]www.gaisma.com[/URL]Comment
-
Correct Maryland SREC's will run out in 13 years if not extended.
However the flaw in YOUR logic is you have discounted the savings due to added generation. SREC's or not I have seen an average of 5-7% increased harvest using the micro's above the PV Watts prediction which is used to certify his system.
But I know from experience SREC will go away, and even though they may be in the books for 13 years, don;t count on it, tax and rate payers are fed up with government waste and subsidies. Many states in the next few years will default, when and if it happens it is all gone and wiped off the books. All you have to do is look around at what is happening today.MSEE, PEComment
Copyright © 2014 SolarReviews All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.1.3
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 02:35 PM.
Comment