Trinamount II vs traditional racking

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aeyackery
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 1

    Trinamount II vs traditional racking

    Can anyone educate me on typical price per watt on traditional rail systems vs the Trinamount II system?

    From what I've read the Trinamount system seems to be much more cost/time effective but I can't find any pricing! I appreciate any information.
  • greenHouse
    Solar Fanatic
    • Dec 2009
    • 235

    #2
    Originally posted by aeyackery
    Can anyone educate me on typical price per watt on traditional rail systems vs the Trinamount II system?

    From what I've read the Trinamount system seems to be much more cost/time effective but I can't find any pricing! I appreciate any information.
    There are too many variables, including demand in your specific area as well as labor costs -- don't forget that higher price-per-watt for hardware may be offset by lower total hours of labor for the actual installation -- to give you a clue. Cheap racking is ugly, pretty racking is expensive. Frame-integrated racking is both pretty and cheaper.

    I have seen the Trinamount products put together and was fairly impressed -- the twist-and-lock mechanism they use is truly slick. That said, I would suggest going with a Zep product. ET Solar has a Zep-frame ACPV module, so you benefit doubly -- you get frame-integrated racking and a frame-mounted microinverter. ET Solar isn't the only vendor using Zep, so you aren't locked into one manufacturer's products.
    Julie in Texas

    Comment

    • Naptown
      Solar Fanatic
      • Feb 2011
      • 6880

      #3
      Originally posted by greenHouse
      There are too many variables, including demand in your specific area as well as labor costs -- don't forget that higher price-per-watt for hardware may be offset by lower total hours of labor for the actual installation -- to give you a clue. Cheap racking is ugly, pretty racking is expensive. Frame-integrated racking is both pretty and cheaper.

      I have seen the Trinamount products put together and was fairly impressed -- the twist-and-lock mechanism they use is truly slick. That said, I would suggest going with a Zep product. ET Solar has a Zep-frame ACPV module, so you benefit doubly -- you get frame-integrated racking and a frame-mounted microinverter. ET Solar isn't the only vendor using Zep, so you aren't locked into one manufacturer's products.
      I believe the Trinamount is a Zep product.
      The components look identical
      NABCEP certified Technical Sales Professional

      [URL="http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?5334-Solar-Off-Grid-Battery-Design"]http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...Battery-Design[/URL]

      [URL]http://www.calculator.net/voltage-drop-calculator.html[/URL] (Voltage drop Calculator among others)

      [URL="http://www.gaisma.com"]www.gaisma.com[/URL]

      Comment

      • greenHouse
        Solar Fanatic
        • Dec 2009
        • 235

        #4
        Originally posted by Naptown
        I believe the Trinamount is a Zep product.
        The components look identical
        If that's the case, I'd be fine with it, but there did appear to be some differences. I have 6 or 8 Zep modules from a manufacturer I can't mention (they are engineering samples ...) and they do appear to be different. On the other paw -- could be because they are engineering samples
        Julie in Texas

        Comment

        Working...