interesting... I had not thought of going to the manufacturer of the micro inverters as an option. I might get up on the roof over the weekend and see if I can capture some name plate or manufacturer data, then research further.
I appreciate the encouragement on insisting that panel level monitoring is a requirement. I guess I was just ignorant at time of purchase and could not imagine that this would not be provided after seeing other people's system and the ability to see this deep into the system. Shame on me.
2017 being an odd year? Huh, had not thought of that either. I would be interested if anyone knew of a local database (or comparative system) that would shed some light on this idea for reference. This is all so "shades of grey". I think this is one more reason to stay focused on max kW per day or per week or other... (and not kWh), right?
I also wonder if maybe when the inverters were replaced in 2018, that maybe I got a bad batch and they are not performing up to specs at 320W in subsequent years...
Try our solar cost and savings calculator
Most Popular Content
Collapse
new member here - looking to learn
Collapse
X
-
If you have Enphase micro inverters, there are two things I believe you can do.
Ask to have Installer privilege on your account so you can access all the data.
From reading people experiences on this forum, it looks like sometimes the installer refuses it (they don't want you to find out problems...), but you can go directly to Enphase to have them give that to you.
In some cases, I have also heard they may want you to pay a subscription for panel level data access.
Enphase users may be able to chime in.
But I would stand firm, you paid a lot of money for your system, and individual panel monitoring is one of the key advantages of microinverters, so you should have access to the full monitoring period!
On another note, it seems the one odd year is 2017, and I am wondering if there are any historical database of Solar radiation in your area that would allow you to see if 2017 was a special year or not. If you can give your county in CA, maybe someone here can provide their daily production graphs for the same years to see if there is a similar trend.
This is not exact as irradiation varies for location to location, and you have shade, but it could be a valuable data point if it shows the same difference between the first half of 2017 and the succeeding years.
Also, can you clarify your shade issue. Need to know what the shade comes from. Is it a fixed structure that does not change overtime, or a variable structure like trees?
If so check when does the shade happen (hours of the day), and what predominant month it happens (shade can be bigger in winter season when the sun is low and the shadows get longer). Then extrapolate how that will change if the trees are growing taller (longer hours periods, and longer day periods...)Leave a comment:
-
From looking at the daily graphs (day interval), it looks like the second half of the year track fairly well, and that the bulk of the difference is in the first half ( I assume day # goes from January first (1) till December 31st (365)
The difference between the 2017 (blue) and 2020 (green) could probably be seasonal weather difference.
The fact that during the second half of the year, the production tracks better would indicate that if there was an actual HW problem, it would have fixed itself which is rare, and so also comfort weather as the more likely source.
The fact that each year at times crosses over to be the top production is also encouraging and pointing to seasonal weather rather than HW failure
That said, 2019 (red) looks way low in April May June, So I would make a separate hourly graph of the three years for each of these month.
April only with the 3 years, May only with the three years, and June only with the three years, to see if the offset is uniform or crosses over.
But the next step would really require to have access to the panel level data, first with daily interval during these three month.
If the difference is weather related, all panels will pretty much track, but if the panels do not track it may point to panels or micro inverter failures.
It may also reveal if your shade is evolving for the worst. Trees grow taller each year and could play a big factor.
Troubleshooting is where having panel monitoring is worth it. You have micro inverters, you may want to request or pay for full panel level monitoring.
Again, blue is 2017, red is 2019 and green is 2020. New color is orange which represents spring of 2021. Ignore the 2017 references at the bottom - they are January, February, March and April of all 4 years. the light colored lines are the actual values and the large dots are 25 day average trends. Maybe as I collect more data over time and put panel cleaning on my schedule as a yearly or twice a year event, I can further evaluate.
Not sure if I will ever get panel level data - what are your thoughts about how to test the panels or install my own monitoring system? I just feel like I am flying blind.
2021 Spring power compared to 2017.JPGLeave a comment:
-
I did not have a choice about a TOU rate when I went with an EV rate. The super off peak rate used to be $0.11 per kWh but now it is up to $0.15. The tradeoff is the peak rate of up to 0.51 per kWh in summer. That high rate is a two edge sword because that is the rate I get credited at when I send solar to the grid but it is also the rate I pay when the sun goes down. I am in California with PGE.Leave a comment:
-
From looking at the daily graphs (day interval), it looks like the second half of the year track fairly well, and that the bulk of the difference is in the first half ( I assume day # goes from January first (1) till December 31st (365)
The difference between the 2017 (blue) and 2020 (green) could probably be seasonal weather difference.
The fact that during the second half of the year, the production tracks better would indicate that if there was an actual HW problem, it would have fixed itself which is rare, and so also comfort weather as the more likely source.
The fact that each year at times crosses over to be the top production is also encouraging and pointing to seasonal weather rather than HW failure
That said, 2019 (red) looks way low in April May June, So I would make a separate hourly graph of the three years for each of these month.
April only with the 3 years, May only with the three years, and June only with the three years, to see if the offset is uniform or crosses over.
But the next step would really require to have access to the panel level data, first with daily interval during these three month.
If the difference is weather related, all panels will pretty much track, but if the panels do not track it may point to panels or micro inverter failures.
It may also reveal if your shade is evolving for the worst. Trees grow taller each year and could play a big factor.
Troubleshooting is where having panel monitoring is worth it. You have micro inverters, you may want to request or pay for full panel level monitoring.
Last edited by scrambler; 04-12-2021, 09:30 PM.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
30 DAY MOVING AVERAGES. BLUE IS 2017, RED IS 2019 AND GREEN IS 2020 (skipped 2018 due to inverter replacements that year).
Capture.JPGLeave a comment:
-
What kind of monitoring does your system provide both in terms of time interval (hours or only days), and system details (only the full array, or also individual panels).
Also do you have the ability to download that data for any given period, so you could potentially bring it into a spreadsheet like Excel?
Based on that, we can devise an approach to try and narrow down what has been happening over the last few years.
For example, assume you have access to everything I mentioned above. You could start by downloading the full array daily interval production for the last few years, and graph that in the same graph, to see how the graph changes from year to year on a daily basis.
Based on the results, you can then dig deeper with similar graph for each panel, or if the above shows specific periods with wide variations, you can create the graph for these specific periods using the hourly data.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
I keep track of my monthly electric bills and compare that to my NET usage. I track dollars and kWhs from the bills. I have two EVs so i have a lot of control when I charge my EVs and how much I charge them. I expect some degradation and occasionally think about cleaning the panels. I am on a TOU rate and my conclusion is that I have more control over my consumption than I do over the factors that influence production. The biggest return on my investment of time is the energy conservation measures that I can take. That includes shifting usage to lower TOU rate periods. After 10 years with solar panels on 3 different homes I have seen the rate changes take more out of my economics than any degradation of the system output.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Richard: I guess that is the part that I do not understand... my four indicators that influence my thoughts about underperformance are below. I might qualify that while I "think" there might be a problem, I do not know due to lack of education and officially, I still recommend solar to everyone!
kWh: installer suggested I might see 7,250 kWh per year (taking into consideration a shade analysis). In year one, I saw 6,300 kWh, but the most I have seen over the last three years (after 18 inverter replacements) is about 5,500 kWh per year. I know we have some shade that affects some panels at different times of the year, so I discount this one some.
kW at micro inverter level: In February of 2017 (two months after install), I obtained a screen shot where some of the panels were generating 318 Watts (pretty close to name plate at 327 W / AC Max continuous output power at 320 W). I recently read that it might be a good idea to clean the panels. After cleaning, I obtained a recent report (March of this year) that suggested the panels were maxing out over a one week period at around 270 watts each. Some of the panels were much lower due to shade that affects a few panels at different times of the day.
kW at system level: In 2017, we saw one maximum of 5,410 watts in April. Maximum that I am seeing now is about 4,400 watts (even after cleaning).
Electric bills: I know, not a good indicator due to usage, but in year one, we saw lots of negative electric bills (mostly in the spring). In last three years, we have only seen one negative electric bill.
I have been researching how to test the panels, but the recommendations vary from using volt meters, amp meters, irradiance meters, insolation meters and the like, but not really sure what kind of questions to ask.Leave a comment:
-
What kind of monitoring does your system provide both in terms of time interval (hours or only days), and system details (only the full array, or also individual panels).
Also do you have the ability to download that data for any given period, so you could potentially bring it into a spreadsheet like Excel?
Based on that, we can devise an approach to try and narrow down what has been happening over the last few years.
For example, assume you have access to everything I mentioned above. You could start by downloading the full array daily interval production for the last few years, and graph that in the same graph, to see how the graph changes from year to year on a daily basis.
Based on the results, you can then dig deeper with similar graph for each panel, or if the above shows specific periods with wide variations, you can create the graph for these specific periods using the hourly data.Last edited by scrambler; 04-12-2021, 04:56 PM.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
kWh: installer suggested I might see 7,250 kWh per year (taking into consideration a shade analysis). In year one, I saw 6,300 kWh, but the most I have seen over the last three years (after 18 inverter replacements) is about 5,500 kWh per year. I know we have some shade that affects some panels at different times of the year, so I discount this one some.
kW at micro inverter level: In February of 2017 (two months after install), I obtained a screen shot where some of the panels were generating 318 Watts (pretty close to name plate at 327 W / AC Max continuous output power at 320 W). I recently read that it might be a good idea to clean the panels. After cleaning, I obtained a recent report (March of this year) that suggested the panels were maxing out over a one week period at around 270 watts each. Some of the panels were much lower due to shade that affects a few panels at different times of the day.
kW at system level: In 2017, we saw one maximum of 5,410 watts in April. Maximum that I am seeing now is about 4,400 watts (even after cleaning).
Electric bills: I know, not a good indicator due to usage, but in year one, we saw lots of negative electric bills (mostly in the spring). In last three years, we have only seen one negative electric bill.
I have been researching how to test the panels, but the recommendations vary from using volt meters, amp meters, irradiance meters, insolation meters and the like, but not really sure what kind of questions to ask.
Last edited by ajonestx; 04-12-2021, 04:07 PM.Leave a comment:
-
- total panel area: 409 SF
- proposed System Peak Power: 5.767 kW DC (5.761 kW AC)
- Proposed annual production: 7,250 kWh (supplying 83% of annual electric use).
- 18 panels - STC DC Power: 327W with micro inverters
- array is south facing (with some shade) that feed into two strings to a combiner box, then into main electrical panel
Leave a comment:
Copyright © 2014 SolarReviews All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.1.0
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 07:06 AM.
Leave a comment: