X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Feenalicious
    replied
    Originally posted by posplayr
    Not sure what happned to my other post, so here is a retry. Manual says needs no more than 5 ft of #2/0 wire
    Yes, this much I got right. The inverter location is less than 5 ft from the battery bank and I bought the correct gauge wire. Thanks for checking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    "Fuses down"

    Originally posted by sensij
    Hopefully the OP follows through with using a 650 W inverter with the 12 V system, or fuses the 2000 W down to a current that can be handled safely.
    Yes, switching to the 650W. Just wondering, what do you mean by "fuses the 2000W down...?"

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    design reconsidered

    Originally posted by thastinger
    OP, you should really reconsider your system design here. Your inverter is way to big and, assuming your batteries are 12V 100AH, and you discharged them at a C10 rate, a 500W load is all you could run. If you tried to run a much larger load, the inverter will likely shut down due to voltage sag from the battery bank (unless these are AGM batteries). If they are 100AH batteries, you'll have a 400A connection, you won't be able to terminate that to a 12V battery post without increasing the risk of fire/spark. A 600W inverter is plenty. Whatever you decide, please understand that your 2000W inverter would be pulling 153A through the cables and understand the risks associated with that.
    Much thanks, Thastinger. Yes, of course, I will be using the 650 Watt Inverter. Unfortunately, I started researching this solar project three months ago then shelved it until now. I've obviously forgotten most of what I learned. Can I trouble you to show me your calculations that gave you the 500W load number and the 153A passing through the cables? I need to understand this completely and that will give me a little "jump start" back into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by posplayr
    Not sure what happned to my other post, so here is a retry. Manual says needs no more than 5 ft of #2/0 wire
    That is the problem with using high wattage inverters on a 12volt system. The potential current draw is very large requiring big wire and fusing.

    I did a similar fubar when I purchased a 2500/5000w inverter. I used wiring capable of handling 200amp and fused it to 150a before I really understood my dilemma of draining my small battery 200Ah system.

    I now have a 600 watt pure sine wave inverter on the system so I kept the wire but downsized the fuse to 60amp.

    Leave a comment:


  • posplayr
    replied
    Originally posted by sensij
    Hopefully the OP follows through with using a 650 W inverter with the 12 V system, or fuses the 2000 W down to a current that can be handled safely.

    Not sure what happned to my other post, so here is a retry. Manual says needs no more than 5 ft of #2/0 wire

    DC Input Cable:
    • Low resistance wire (copper) is required for all the DC connections between the inverter and
    the battery bank.
    • For 38210, 38310, uses minimum #2 AWG wire with maximum cable length of 5 feet.
    • For 38215, use minimum #1/0 AWG wire with maximum cable length of 5 feet.
    For 38320, use minimum #2/0 AWG wire with a maximum cable length of 5 feet.

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    Originally posted by thastinger
    <Snip> A 600W inverter is plenty. Whatever you decide, please understand that your 2000W inverter would be pulling 153A through the cables and understand the risks associated with that.
    Originally posted by Feenalicious
    I was originally planning a larger system when there were two people living here and bought the inverter then. Didn't realize these repercussions from keeping the 2000V inverter. I actually have a 650W inverter I can use.
    Originally posted by posplayr
    For OP these huge wires are the reason you would rather have a 24 or 48 volt input to your invertor.

    The power losses go up in proportion to current squared requiring wire diameters to go up in proportion. In other words a 24V system would use 1/4 the wire diameter or be able to go four times are far (not limited to 5ft).

    At 48 volts you would have a factor of 16.
    Hopefully the OP follows through with using a 650 W inverter with the 12 V system, or fuses the 2000 W down to a current that can be handled safely.

    Leave a comment:


  • posplayr
    replied
    For OP these huge wires are the reason you would rather have a 24 or 48 volt input to your invertor.

    The power losses go up in proportion to current squared requiring wire diameters to go up in proportion. In other words a 24V system would use 1/4 the wire diameter or be able to go four times are far (not limited to 5ft).

    At 48 volts you would have a factor of 16.

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    According to the manual for that CC, you can run 400 W in parallel on a 12 V system at just under 94% efficiency, or in series-parallel at just over 94%. If you go all 4 in series, efficiency would drop to under 92.5%, probably costing more than you're getting in reduced transmission losses.

    So, with this, I would suggest series-parallel on the array, which lets you cut out the fuses you originally asked about.

    If you eventually go to a 24 V battery bank, your CC efficiency could improve to around 97.5%, if you stayed with 400 W in series-parallel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    Product code for charger

    Originally posted by sensij
    Yes. MPPT will help even if you stick with parallel, because there is still some PWM loss between the typical panel voltage (17 V) and the battery voltage (~14 V). But if your CC input voltage range is large enough to allow series-parallel, or even entirely series, you'll save money on the wiring and fuses, and should have less transmission loss too.

    However, your brief description of the charge controller said it can handle 12 or 24 V input. That actually sounds more like PWM than MPPT. Do you have a model number or anything?
    PRODUCT CODE: CTRL-MPPT40 http://www.renogy-store.com/40-Amp-M...trl-mppt40.htm

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    Originally posted by Feenalicious
    I see, I'm not utilizing a key benefit of the MPPT controller, the higher voltage I can get by putting the panels in series, right?
    Yes. MPPT will help even if you stick with parallel, because there is still some PWM loss between the typical panel voltage (17 V) and the battery voltage (~14 V). But if your CC input voltage range is large enough to allow series-parallel, or even entirely series, you'll save money on the wiring and fuses, and should have less transmission loss too.

    However, your brief description of the charge controller said it can handle 12 or 24 V input. That actually sounds more like PWM than MPPT. Do you have a model number or anything?

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    Details of my system:

    Here are the components I have, including specs:

    4 ea Renogy 100W 12V Monocrystalline Solar Panels
    --Max Power: 100W, Max System Voltage: 600V DC (UL), Optimum Operating Voltage (Vmp): 18.9V, Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc): 22.5V, Optimum Operating Current (Imp): 5.29A, Short-Circuit Current (Isc): 5.75A, Maximum Series Fuse Rating: 15A

    4 ea Super Start Marine Batteries, 12 volt, 105ah, 210 reserve capacity

    1 ea Renogy 40A MPPT Solar Panel Charge Regulator
    --Nominal System Voltage: 12V/24V, Auto recognition, Max. PV Input Power: 400W (12V), 800W (24V), Rated Charge Current: 40A, Rated Discharge Current: 20A, Max. Solar Input Voltage: 100VDC, Self-consumption: <10mA (24V), Maximum Battery Voltage: 32V, Charge Circuit Voltage Drop: ≤0.26V, Discharge Circuit Voltage Drop: ≤0.15V

    1 ea Nature Power 38320 2000V Pure Sine Wave Inverter
    --Power (Continuous): 2000W, Power (Peak): 4000W, Voltage: 120Vac, Current: 16.6A, Frequency: 60±1Hz, Waveform: True Sinewave, DC Output: 5V USB

    This solar system is for powering an off-grid RV.
    Last edited by Feenalicious; 07-15-2015, 07:10 AM. Reason: Amp hours corrected

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    Originally posted by sensij
    With an MPPT charge controller, why would you have those four panels in parallel (unless they are oriented different directions)? For most true MPPT controllers, you could probably pair the panels and put the two pairs in parallel, or with the better CC's, go all four in series.
    I see, I'm not utilizing a key benefit of the MPPT controller, the higher voltage I can get by putting the panels in series, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    Thanks for the heads-up

    Originally posted by thastinger
    OP, you should really reconsider your system design here. Your inverter is way to big and, assuming your batteries are 12V 100AH, and you discharged them at a C10 rate, a 500W load is all you could run. If you tried to run a much larger load, the inverter will likely shut down due to voltage sag from the battery bank (unless these are AGM batteries). If they are 100AH batteries, you'll have a 400A connection, you won't be able to terminate that to a 12V battery post without increasing the risk of fire/spark. A 600W inverter is plenty. Whatever you decide, please understand that your 2000W inverter would be pulling 153A through the cables and understand the risks associated with that.
    I was originally planning a larger system when there were two people living here and bought the inverter then. Didn't realize these repercussions from keeping the 2000V inverter. I actually have a 650W inverter I can use.

    Leave a comment:


  • Feenalicious
    replied
    Ah, I see. So I can have 24 volt output from pv-

    Originally posted by Raul
    You are confusing CC input here
    If you are certain that your controller is a true 40a mppt it must have at least 70v pv input . Those you mention above are battery voltage to the controller . The controller can take a higher input from pv and convert it to the appropriate battery voltage.
    That was one of my questions, thank you. So the controller can indeed take 24V solar output and convert it to 12V to go the battery bank.

    Leave a comment:


  • thastinger
    replied
    OP, you should really reconsider your system design here. Your inverter is way to big and, assuming your batteries are 12V 100AH, and you discharged them at a C10 rate, a 500W load is all you could run. If you tried to run a much larger load, the inverter will likely shut down due to voltage sag from the battery bank (unless these are AGM batteries). If they are 100AH batteries, you'll have a 400A connection, you won't be able to terminate that to a 12V battery post without increasing the risk of fire/spark. A 600W inverter is plenty. Whatever you decide, please understand that your 2000W inverter would be pulling 153A through the cables and understand the risks associated with that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...