Context of this thread:
This person from Canada asks for some help on a case study which which asks him to look at two generator/battery configurations, one with PV and the other without PV Solar. He gets a lot of suggestions, many are outside the parameters of the case study.
I post a link to a source of information that seems to infer that solar plus batteries is becoming economical. It is an economic trend that he could explore in more detail if he found it useful. Disregard the future projections. I believe the costs are real. What does any of your rant have to do with the question that the original poster asked? If you want to talk about the data then talk about the data; What do you not believe about $30 per megaWatt hour quoted in the article? Do you have more accurate costs?
Why do you take this so personal?
FWIW, SPGlobal is the parent of Standard & Poors which has been around over 140 years and employs 10,000 people.
This person from Canada asks for some help on a case study which which asks him to look at two generator/battery configurations, one with PV and the other without PV Solar. He gets a lot of suggestions, many are outside the parameters of the case study.
I post a link to a source of information that seems to infer that solar plus batteries is becoming economical. It is an economic trend that he could explore in more detail if he found it useful. Disregard the future projections. I believe the costs are real. What does any of your rant have to do with the question that the original poster asked? If you want to talk about the data then talk about the data; What do you not believe about $30 per megaWatt hour quoted in the article? Do you have more accurate costs?
Why do you take this so personal?
FWIW, SPGlobal is the parent of Standard & Poors which has been around over 140 years and employs 10,000 people.
Comment