OK Sensij,
Although I am done with the tilt thing until it moves, I will DISCUSS with you this very relevant portion of your thoughtful reply as it is back on track to assisting Mr. Silver with his pallets of panels. I know that consumption is king, but I still maintain there are other ways to skin this cat, and call it Devil's Advocacy, or since that sounds antagonistic, call it 'throwing a stick on the fire to see if it burns' I will continue with a heinous supply side discussion.
[perhaps Morningstar would say...] Mr. Silver - do you have a specific site in mind? In other words, could someone do a preliminary site survey to determine IF you can deploy all of those panels in a meaningful way? Perhaps you, you probably have a notion of that probability. If the site is already fixed, and won't support full deployment it will tailor the rest of the conversation without knowing anything of your preferred anticipated load envelope.
[perhaps Morningstar would say...] Mr. Silver - would you be amenable to adding more panels in order to balance multi-MPPT input configurations? If so, to what extent? This would also tailor the conversation without knowing anything of your preferred anticipated load envelope.
[perhaps Morningstar would say...] Mr. Silver - Under the assumption that we would deploy the panels provided only, our minimum suggested equipment list to maximize yield would be $_______. This would include everything up to and including AC service panels. It does not provide for split AC, lightning suppression, or any generator. Would that be a deal breaker?
IF Morningstar was to say/ask these things, and a few more I could think of, without knowing anything about consumption or load, would you call them 'irresponsible' or 'brash'?
EDIT: The above two posts came in while I was typing this. Glad to see we're back on track. Thanx.
Although I am done with the tilt thing until it moves, I will DISCUSS with you this very relevant portion of your thoughtful reply as it is back on track to assisting Mr. Silver with his pallets of panels. I know that consumption is king, but I still maintain there are other ways to skin this cat, and call it Devil's Advocacy, or since that sounds antagonistic, call it 'throwing a stick on the fire to see if it burns' I will continue with a heinous supply side discussion.
[perhaps Morningstar would say...] Mr. Silver - do you have a specific site in mind? In other words, could someone do a preliminary site survey to determine IF you can deploy all of those panels in a meaningful way? Perhaps you, you probably have a notion of that probability. If the site is already fixed, and won't support full deployment it will tailor the rest of the conversation without knowing anything of your preferred anticipated load envelope.
[perhaps Morningstar would say...] Mr. Silver - would you be amenable to adding more panels in order to balance multi-MPPT input configurations? If so, to what extent? This would also tailor the conversation without knowing anything of your preferred anticipated load envelope.
[perhaps Morningstar would say...] Mr. Silver - Under the assumption that we would deploy the panels provided only, our minimum suggested equipment list to maximize yield would be $_______. This would include everything up to and including AC service panels. It does not provide for split AC, lightning suppression, or any generator. Would that be a deal breaker?
IF Morningstar was to say/ask these things, and a few more I could think of, without knowing anything about consumption or load, would you call them 'irresponsible' or 'brash'?
EDIT: The above two posts came in while I was typing this. Glad to see we're back on track. Thanx.
Comment