Flywheel instead of battery storage?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • walltr8der
    replied
    Originally posted by billvon
    And it vibrates you to sleep, too.
    Does not vibrate --Let's be serious Can't even hear it!

    Leave a comment:


  • walltr8der
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave3011
    An exciting prospect it this technology ever makes it mainstream is going to bed at night, sleeping with that comforting knowledge that there's a two-ton flywheel spinning at thousands of miles per hour underneath your bed hehehehehe...
    Dave a 10 kWh device weighs 1400lbs.. No maglev bearings

    Leave a comment:


  • walltr8der
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave3011
    Of course I knew I'd see guys on this thread that claim to have done it already. These are the same people that claim to have come up with lithium batteries that have comparable energy densities to gasoline. Yes I know very well it's theoretically possible and maybe even working in a laboratory somewhere. The problem is why aren't they at all the solar installation companies in the the industrial sectors of every city yet? Answer is they aren't tried and tested or economically viable yet. The point of this thread is to get people talking about why they aren't there yet. What are the snags? What's holding progress back? One thing I do know for a fact is it's not low lead acid battery prices - while PV costs and other battery costs have been coming down lead acid is on the way up. If trends continue soon lead acid will no longer be the most cost effective way. A BIG GAP in the market is busy opening up!
    Dave --It's money!! Testing cost lots.... My prototype works very well and the private enterprises don't want it to happen ---It's a fight to the end.... The engineers @ Krupp love it but the guys in the board room will not sign a check! Wasted 9 months with them... All politics....

    Leave a comment:


  • russ
    replied
    Originally posted by walltr8der
    I think when you drill down, you will see what we have devised.
    With what there is on your web site one finds zip upon drilling.

    If you want people to get in line you really do need to provide a bit more information/detail and a lot less of the "trust me".

    Leave a comment:


  • billvon
    replied
    Originally posted by inetdog
    Interestingly, the biggest practical problem is not the required low temperature (which is admittedly annoying). It is that it is hard to maintain superconductivity in the presence of a strong magnetic field . . . .
    ?? Almost every MRI magnet in the country is made of superconducting wire. There are thousands of them, and operate at field strengths up to 7 tesla. Did you mean 'changing magnetic field?'

    Leave a comment:


  • walltr8der
    replied
    Ceo

    Originally posted by Dave3011
    Being an engineer in my day job I have learnt over and over again that the simplest solutions are always the best.

    By their very nature batteries are complex, hence their need to be mollycoddled so much. Nothing can be simpler than accellerating mass to store energy. The problem as always is that we humans haven't figured out how to do it "simply and effectively" yet.

    "Two brains are better than one", and therefore 10's to 100's or even upwards of 1000 should be far better. The more people we get thinking about it the more likely it is that some genuis somewhere will give it enough thought to have that eurika moment to make it work.

    I don't claim to have found any secret or disruptive technology, but I do hope to stimulate a discussion that may in turn stimulate some of the brighter minds on this planet - some of the minds possesed by the likes who invented the lightbulb, the internet, photovoltaics etc. Then maybe one day hairy-arsed engineers like me would no longer have to suffer the endless frustrations associated with batteries...
    Hi Dave... The guys at Energy Storage Solutions have been working on the above mentioned issues for years.. Guys at MIT, Texas A&M and the Univ of Toronto were working with us to develop this disruptive flywheel. I think when you drill down, you will see what we have devised. Development of a flywheel takes multi-level brain power..Electric Engineering Mechanical Engineering and many other understandings for it to be successful..Actually, it amazes me! There is nothing better than to prove everybody wrong. If done correctly, flywheels work....Cheers!

    Leave a comment:


  • billvon
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave3011
    An exciting prospect it this technology ever makes it mainstream is going to bed at night, sleeping with that comforting knowledge that there's a two-ton flywheel spinning at thousands of miles per hour underneath your bed hehehehehe...
    And it vibrates you to sleep, too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave3011
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle
    Actually the have inertia but I guess kinetic potential too.
    An exciting prospect it this technology ever makes it mainstream is going to bed at night, sleeping with that comforting knowledge that there's a two-ton flywheel spinning at thousands of miles per hour underneath your bed hehehehehe...

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by FunGas
    sorry, but that made me spit my drink on the screen...
    Actually the have inertia but I guess kinetic potential too.

    Leave a comment:


  • FunGas
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle
    flywheels have some potential
    sorry, but that made me spit my drink on the screen...

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by inetdog
    Interestingly, the biggest practical problem is not the required low temperature (which is admittedly annoying). It is that it is hard to maintain superconductivity in the presence of a strong magnetic field, and a wire carrying high current can be counted on to produce a magnetic field.
    Getting a Super conducting distribution system to work would be a major win for the Utility business but as you said not only is the low temperature a barrier there are other obstacles like the magnetic field issue that have to be knocked down to make the technology work.

    As with the Flywheel technology. There are a lot of barriers in place to make it physically as well as economically to work.

    I am still hoping for the "black hole" technology for an energy source.

    Leave a comment:


  • inetdog
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle
    And the technology of super conducting wires has been around since the 60's but they still have not come up with a working solution due to the extreme cold temperatures needed to make the wire work.
    Interestingly, the biggest practical problem is not the required low temperature (which is admittedly annoying). It is that it is hard to maintain superconductivity in the presence of a strong magnetic field, and a wire carrying high current can be counted on to produce a magnetic field.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunking
    replied
    Originally posted by billvon
    That flywheel technology has not progressed as fast as the simpler big power plant technology, nor has the function it provides (load leveling/utility scale storage/frequency stabilization) been needed as much in the past.
    Hummm, Flywheel electric energy as been around over 100 years and was used as the very first UPS systems. Just how much more time are you talking about with a very mature technology?

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by billvon
    That flywheel technology has not progressed as fast as the simpler big power plant technology, nor has the function it provides (load leveling/utility scale storage/frequency stabilization) been needed as much in the past.

    Keep in mind that 60 years ago there were ZERO nuclear power plants around vs lots of oil fired power plants. That would be a poor fact to cite to try to claim that therefore nuclear power had no future.
    And the technology of super conducting wires has been around since the 60's but they still have not come up with a working solution due to the extreme cold temperatures needed to make the wire work.

    Again. I think flywheels have some potential but you are trying to describe Utility size units. No one has come close to even a 500kW size one let along the Megawatt range needed to keep the Utility power smooth and flywheels have been around a lot longer than Nuclear power plants.

    Leave a comment:


  • billvon
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunking
    Proof is in application. To date hundred of Peaker Plants vs ZERO Flywheels. What on earth could that mean?
    That flywheel technology has not progressed as fast as the simpler big power plant technology, nor has the function it provides (load leveling/utility scale storage/frequency stabilization) been needed as much in the past.

    Keep in mind that 60 years ago there were ZERO nuclear power plants around vs lots of oil fired power plants. That would be a poor fact to cite to try to claim that therefore nuclear power had no future.

    Leave a comment:

Working...