Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Estimating panel output of flat mounted panels?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Estimating panel output of flat mounted panels?

    Hey Everyone,

    I am plugging away on my RV solar design and have run into a question that is causing me some confusion.

    I will be mounting the panels flat on the roof as my parking orientation is variable. No telling, on any given day, which direction I will be pointing .

    I set out to figure out how much to derate panels that are flat mounted. What I found was, depending on who you believe, it is somewhere between 10-50%.

    That's a pretty broad range.

    What have you all found to be "reality " regarding flat panel production Vs tilted?

    Thanks.

    S.

  • #2
    Its mostly a matter of how much solar radiation is intercepted. If the suns rays are not perpendicular
    to the panel surface, try the cosign of the angle difference. Bruce Roe

    Comment


    • #3
      I got it.... The difference will vary depending on latitude and season. ..


      Is there a "rule of thumb " for design purposes?

      if I am off by 15 degrees from perpendicular then I will loose about 4% and at 30 degrees I will loose 14%.

      If I am understanding correctly, the loss won't be as bad as I feared.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by PNW_Steve View Post
        I got it.... The difference will vary depending on latitude and season. ..


        Is there a "rule of thumb " for design purposes?
        No.

        Do this: Run PVWatts for a 1 kW array in the horizontal orientation for a desired location. Get the hourly output option

        Then run the same location at an orientation of your choice.

        Then divide corresponding outputs for a comparison of penalties/gains one orientation to the other.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by J.P.M. View Post

          No.

          Do this: Run PVWatts for a 1 kW array in the horizontal orientation for a desired location. Get the hourly output option

          Then run the same location at an orientation of your choice.

          Then divide corresponding outputs for a comparison of penalties/gains one orientation to the other.
          I Goggled "pvwatts" and found an NREL site. I am assuming that is what you are referring to.

          Using my current location in WA I see a 14% drop in production. That is much less than I had anticipated.

          I have 1800 watts of panels on the garage. Given my energy budget, looking like I am not going to need them all

          Comment


          • #6
            Fortunately for solar, cosigns of smaller angles are not so much less than a 1 multiplier. But shade,
            clouds, and reduced sun intensity will cost more in many areas. A panel putting out its rated max is
            rarely seen here. Bruce Roe

            Comment


            • #7
              If there is an inexpensive way to add some slope you may enjoy slightly better production because dust will wash off more easily. It depends on how much dust accumulates and the frequency and quantity of rain in your area. I have no way to quantify the benefit, butI have one flat installation and light summer rains leave some dirt because the lip of the panel inhibits complete drainage and the dirt collects near the edges of the panels. It is very difficult for me to access those panels because it takes a 30 ft ladder. Perhaps more experienced users have more to add.
              9 kW solar, 42kWh LFP storage. EV owner since 2012

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bcroe View Post
                Fortunately for solar, cosigns of smaller angles are not so much less than a 1 multiplier. But shade,
                clouds, and reduced sun intensity will cost more in many areas. A panel putting out its rated max is
                rarely seen here. Bruce Roe
                A panel putting out its STC rating is pretty rare everywhere, and even then only for something like maybe a few minutes a year.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by PNW_Steve View Post

                  I Goggled "pvwatts" and found an NREL site. I am assuming that is what you are referring to.

                  Using my current location in WA I see a 14% drop in production. That is much less than I had anticipated.

                  I have 1800 watts of panels on the garage. Given my energy budget, looking like I am not going to need them all
                  Yes, PVWatts. It is a pretty handy tool for preliminary design that can have other uses for the creative mind besides as a model.

                  Depending on orientation and location, that 10 - 50 % initial guess probably isn't bad for a 1st approx.

                  In Seattle, PVWatts Jan. daily output for horiz. ~ 0.99 kWh/day per STC per STC kW.
                  In Seattle, PVWatts Jan. daily output for tilt @ lat. ~ 2.00 kWh/day per STC kW.

                  In Yakama, PVWatts Jan. daily output for horiz. ~ 1.1 kWh/day per STC kW.
                  In Yakama, PVWatts Jan. daily output for tilt @ lat. ~ 2.14 kWh/day per STC kW.

                  In Albuquerque, PVWatts daily output for horiz. ~ 3.32 kWh/day per STC kW.
                  In Albuquerque, PVWatts daily output for horiz. ~ 5.73 kWh/day per STC kW.

                  Those model numbers are for grid tied systems. Off grid will be different, and any and all applications' outputs will always be different than any model will produce. Any system's output will be have like the difference between weather and climate: Climate ( or a model's output) is what you might reasonably expect over the long haul. Weather (or a system's actual output) is what you get over the short term.

                  Notice in the above examples, that the ratio of tilted to horiz. output tends to go down as the clearness of a location goes up. That's a general but not universal or unfailing trend, and why I includes Albuquerque in the examples as that place is about as sunny as it gets in the winter.

                  If you live in eastern WA, that may be one reason(but probably a small one), besides Bruce's comment about cosines, and perhaps some differences in the way you're using the model, why you may be seeing the model shows a lower output penalty for a horiz. orientation than you might have thought.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    0080-b3.jpg

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'll suggest that more power could be had than indicated on the above chart, by operating the cell
                      at MPPT. Probably near 80% of OC V. If that was done, the voltage would not vary so much.

                      Interesting how much power is shown for 0 degrees. That would be from dispersed light in this case,
                      I think 0 watts if done in a vacuum with no dispersed light allowed. Highly variable. Plenty of power
                      is made here from light dispersed by clouds, with a grossly over paneled array. Bruce Roe

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Ho jo View Post
                        Where did these numbers come from ?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by PNW_Steve View Post
                          Is there a "rule of thumb " for design purposes?
                          Why not just run a model like PVWatts? Real simple and more reliable for design purposes.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            What was really interesting to me was on pv watts in may -july at my latitude .made very little difference flat or at 12
                            Last edited by Ho jo; 12-18-2018, 02:52 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              (Finishing last post) 12 from flat June was best flat

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X