Try our solar cost and savings calculator
Most Popular Topics
Collapse
Sanity check for a new system (San Diego)
Collapse
X
-
Thanks for the offer. Before wasting more of your time, I am pretty much set on the LG300 + M250. My gut feeling is that I may see minimum clipping with brand new panels. However, degradation of the panels within the first couple years will minimize if not totally eliminate such clipping. It would be interesting to see what the theoretical calculation would be. I can report back once the system is installed (I already signed the purchase contract). Yes, I also paid for the individual panel monitoring so I will be able to report back to see if theory matches reality.Are you coastal, inland, mountain or desert ? Closer to Miramar or downtown ? Depending on how much I believe Enphase, I can SWAG clipping hrs. and yearly total kWhrs clipped for no shade scenario using some stuff I wrote. SAM will do the same, but takes a bit of finesse. Holler back w/ confirmed elevations & azimuths or PM if interested.
I am located at the western part of PQ (i.e 56 between 5 and 15). As is, I will have 1.2KW (4 panels, not all together) facing South-ish (187 degrees), 1.5KW facing West (not all together again, 277 degrees), and 1.2KW facing East (97 degrees). My roof is 18 degrees. Due to the complexity of my roof, micro inverter is probably one of the easiest solution for me.
If we trust PVWatts, there are only a few days (and only an hour or so for these days) where the panel output will approach the theoretical limit of M250.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Hi AMCSquared
I am in a similar situation (living near coast in SD) and looking at a system between 3-4 kW. I know we cannot divulge an installer's name but is company "S" have another S and P in its name?
Thanks!Leave a comment:
-
Are you coastal, inland, mountain or desert ? Closer to Miramar or downtown ? Depending on how much I believe Enphase, I can SWAG clipping hrs. and yearly total kWhrs clipped for no shade scenario using some stuff I wrote. SAM will do the same, but takes a bit of finesse. Holler back w/ confirmed elevations & azimuths or PM if interested.Thanks for the pointer. I have read their documentation (which is more about M215). According to their Table 5: Los Angles, 20 Degree (my roof is at 18 degree), and 285 Watt panel would have a 0.13% annual production loss due to clipping. Once again, this documentation is referring to the less powerful M215 and not the current M250.
If you read M250's specification, Enphase says M250 is good for 240W continuous and 250W peak. They also don't specify how long it can operate at 250W. They basically said that M250 will dial back the production to protect the unit when it get "too hot." However, 240W is rated if it operate within the designed environmental range. That said, we all know that solar panel looses its efficiency as it gets hotter also.
Another point, according to LG 300's spec, it can loose up to 3% on the first year usage (and then about 0.7% for the remainder of the 25 year production warranty). I think after one or two years and dirty panels, LG 300 probably would be producing closer to like a 285W panel. I have looked at PVWatt's hourly output using my location, orientation, tilt, and 0.84 derate. I have only seen a handful of time where the average AC production is over 250 watts (on a per panel basis in one hour block). I think PVWatts data does consider temperature as one of the variables. Of course 0.84 derate may or may not be realistic with the LG 300 + M250 combo.
You don't need an engineering degree to know it is probably not a good idea to run things at the theoretical limit. Also, I would never take a "marketing" study from the manufacturer at face value. I have not doubt there will be times when M250 will clip with LG300W in San Diego. The question becomes how often, how long (i.e. half an hour vs. couple hours), and how much loss. I would certainly not run SunPower 325W+ type of panel with the M250. However, I think Enphase is probably close to being right saying M250 shouldn't be used with anything above 300W.Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the pointer. I have read their documentation (which is more about M215). According to their Table 5: Los Angles, 20 Degree (my roof is at 18 degree), and 285 Watt panel would have a 0.13% annual production loss due to clipping. Once again, this documentation is referring to the less powerful M215 and not the current M250.LG 300's are currently in-stock in San Diego, no issue there. Keep in mind this configuration will result in "clipping", which is a shame because the cost per watt of the LG 300 is so much higher than the LG 275. The PTC rating of the LG 300 is 274.5 Watts. The M250 efficiency is 96.5%. If you multiply the two, the "potential" maximum AC power from each solar panel is 264.5 Watts. However the M250 inverter has a maximum output of just 250 Watts. I know the Enphase data sheet states the recommended DC input power is up to 300 Watts. Buy they also published a document admitting that clipping can occur, but not to worry, because it only happens part of the time. Think about a string inverter or solaredge with optimizers.
If you read M250's specification, Enphase says M250 is good for 240W continuous and 250W peak. They also don't specify how long it can operate at 250W. They basically said that M250 will dial back the production to protect the unit when it get "too hot." However, 240W is rated if it operate within the designed environmental range. That said, we all know that solar panel looses its efficiency as it gets hotter also.
Another point, according to LG 300's spec, it can loose up to 3% on the first year usage (and then about 0.7% for the remainder of the 25 year production warranty). I think after one or two years and dirty panels, LG 300 probably would be producing closer to like a 285W panel. I have looked at PVWatt's hourly output using my location, orientation, tilt, and 0.84 derate. I have only seen a handful of time where the average AC production is over 250 watts (on a per panel basis in one hour block). I think PVWatts data does consider temperature as one of the variables. Of course 0.84 derate may or may not be realistic with the LG 300 + M250 combo.
You don't need an engineering degree to know it is probably not a good idea to run things at the theoretical limit. Also, I would never take a "marketing" study from the manufacturer at face value. I have not doubt there will be times when M250 will clip with LG300W in San Diego. The question becomes how often, how long (i.e. half an hour vs. couple hours), and how much loss. I would certainly not run SunPower 325W+ type of panel with the M250. However, I think Enphase is probably close to being right saying M250 shouldn't be used with anything above 300W.Leave a comment:
-
LG 300's are currently in-stock in San Diego, no issue there. Keep in mind this configuration will result in "clipping", which is a shame because the cost per watt of the LG 300 is so much higher than the LG 275. The PTC rating of the LG 300 is 274.5 Watts. The M250 efficiency is 96.5%. If you multiply the two, the "potential" maximum AC power from each solar panel is 264.5 Watts. However the M250 inverter has a maximum output of just 250 Watts. I know the Enphase data sheet states the recommended DC input power is up to 300 Watts. Buy they also published a document admitting that clipping can occur, but not to worry, because it only happens part of the time. Think about a string inverter or solaredge with optimizers.Leave a comment:
-
Not having any personal insight on solar panel distribution channels, I have to rely on the contractor's word that they can get what they sold. Maybe both companies utilize the same upstream distributor and there is a bunch of LG's in the warehouse? It's just weird that almost all the vendor's I contacted quoted LG panel of some sort (I didn't specify LG). Only one company quoted something else, but they only utilize their own brand.
I am going to raise hell if they can't get what they sold, but I am not going to worry about availability right now. I will cross that bridge when I get there.Leave a comment:
-
LG 300 availability - I haven't seen any installed in my neighbor yet. Hope/Maybe I'm wrong. Some vendors claim a private stock. Don't be surprised if you get a call.Two companies were bidding using LG300 panels. Another one was bidding with LG275 (and variations of LG2xx). Outside of SunPower, LG seems to be popular currently within San Diego. I didn't specify panel brand initially (except to say I did NOT want the premium SunPower). I am guessing there is still ample supply of LG panels locally.
I did size the system up from a 3kW to a 3.9kW system to accommodate the Prius Plug-In. I know, not a "true" EV, but close enough. Funny this whole project got kick started due to the purchase of the Prius. Also, we figured if we ever get a Tesla-like EV (something with "practical" battery range and not costing $100K fully loaded), we can always use EV related rate from SDG&E. It is harder to justify PV's cost to replace Tier 1 or T.O.U's lower rate. Replacing Tier 3 and 4's $0.37+ / kWh rate? Easy decision.Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, I think I saw on one of the form for T.O.U which states that we have the right to revert back to DR schedule after receiving the 1st T.O.U bill. Otherwise you are locked in for 12 months. Isn't the whole point of the "Smart Meter" that we get real-time consumption and be able to change the way SDG&E bill us us on the fly?Ain't competitive bidding great ?!
I forgot to add that SDG & E allows (Actually, I think is mandated by CPUC) customers like you & I to try T.O.U. for a period of time & revert to "DR" (tier) schedule if we think T.O.U. sucks.
Sometimes vendors get slippery about pricing on long lead time jobs. FWIW, I'd suggest being doubly sure about escalators built into/buried in the contract. Caveat Emptor.
Oh: and make sure you do indeed get LG 300's for your money. Trust but verify. Read each nameplate and confirm for yourself w/ a good eyeball that they're not LG 260's - LG 290's. Sometimes mistakes happen.
Company "S" contract is pretty straight forward. No hard to understand legalese. I will definitely double check the actual goods delivered.
I will update this thread once there are more interesting things happening. Please do PM me if anyone wants the exact company behind all these alphabet soup names.
Leave a comment:
-
Two companies were bidding using LG300 panels. Another one was bidding with LG275 (and variations of LG2xx). Outside of SunPower, LG seems to be popular currently within San Diego. I didn't specify panel brand initially (except to say I did NOT want the premium SunPower). I am guessing there is still ample supply of LG panels locally.very nice setup with LG300. I thought the LG300 is out of stock everywhere, lucky you
Solar is a long term investment, have you though of Electric Vehicle in next few years? If so, plan on it now. I have recently go through a panel addition, and the cost is crazy. You have no other choice but going with the same installer to keep the warranty.... you will lost your bargaining power when that happen.
I did size the system up from a 3kW to a 3.9kW system to accommodate the Prius Plug-In. I know, not a "true" EV, but close enough. Funny this whole project got kick started due to the purchase of the Prius. Also, we figured if we ever get a Tesla-like EV (something with "practical" battery range and not costing $100K fully loaded), we can always use EV related rate from SDG&E. It is harder to justify PV's cost to replace Tier 1 or T.O.U's lower rate. Replacing Tier 3 and 4's $0.37+ / kWh rate? Easy decision.Leave a comment:
-
Ain't competitive bidding great ?!My T.O.U. calculation is based on my past year's usage. This means the whole family ran whatever they needed whenever they needed it (since there weren't any concept of T.O.U. last year). The calculation also did not take into account for the potential non-peak rate during weekends (assuming the whole weekend is non-peak in the first place). That said, I am still not sold on T.O.U exactly due to the reason you stated.
One final quote update. I did end up going with Company "S". They were willing to not only meet but also beat Company "M" (by couple cents per watt). The original price differential was 35%! It totally makes sense to shop around and get multiple quotes. I chose Company "S" based on personal referral (neighbor and friends).
Here is the final figure:
3.9 kW System
13x LG300W
13x Enphase M250
1x Enphase Envoy Monitoring (whole system only).
$15,327 (or $3.93 per watt).
Individual panel monitoring is the standard $250 extra (not included in the quote above).
They expect between 2 to 3 month lead time before the actual install for design, permit, and HOA approval. 10% down, 60% at install, and the balance at SDG&E final approval for generation.
I forgot to add that SDG & E allows (Actually, I think is mandated by CPUC) customers like you & I to try T.O.U. for a period of time & revert to "DR" (tier) schedule if we think T.O.U. sucks.
Sometimes vendors get slippery about pricing on long lead time jobs. FWIW, I'd suggest being doubly sure about escalators built into/buried in the contract. Caveat Emptor.
Oh: and make sure you do indeed get LG 300's for your money. Trust but verify. Read each nameplate and confirm for yourself w/ a good eyeball that they're not LG 260's - LG 290's. Sometimes mistakes happen.Leave a comment:
-
very nice setup with LG300. I thought the LG300 is out of stock everywhere, lucky you
Solar is a long term investment, have you though of Electric Vehicle in next few years? If so, plan on it now. I have recently go through a panel addition, and the cost is crazy. You have no other choice but going with the same installer to keep the warranty.... you will lost your bargaining power when that happen.Leave a comment:
-
My T.O.U. calculation is based on my past year's usage. This means the whole family ran whatever they needed whenever they needed it (since there weren't any concept of T.O.U. last year). The calculation also did not take into account for the potential non-peak rate during weekends (assuming the whole weekend is non-peak in the first place). That said, I am still not sold on T.O.U exactly due to the reason you stated.I'd suggest not placing a whole lot of confidence in future bills with T.O.U. pricing. Not because you're off, but rather, that it's often and usually harder to get everyone to remember to keep stuff off during peak/semi peak hrs. Nice in theory, tough in practice, thus harder to accurately predict. Most residential SDG & E is not on T.O.U. at this time, probably because most are unaware of it.
One final quote update. I did end up going with Company "S". They were willing to not only meet but also beat Company "M" (by couple cents per watt). The original price differential was 35%! It totally makes sense to shop around and get multiple quotes. I chose Company "S" based on personal referral (neighbor and friends).
Here is the final figure:
3.9 kW System
13x LG300W
13x Enphase M250
1x Enphase Envoy Monitoring (whole system only).
$15,327 (or $3.93 per watt).
Individual panel monitoring is the standard $250 extra (not included in the quote above).
They expect between 2 to 3 month lead time before the actual install for design, permit, and HOA approval. 10% down, 60% at install, and the balance at SDG&E final approval for generation.Leave a comment:
-
Your experience w/the pleasant vendor mimics my own. They're decent folks but they usually won't budge much on price.Couple updates. I started getting quotes for a slightly bigger system due to the Prius Plug-In. 4kW system would have given me a little breathing room during the Winter months.
Company "M"
3.9kW
13 x LG300W
13 x M250 w/ monitoring
$15,405 (or $3.95 / watt)
Company "B"
3kW
11 x LG275W (?)
Either Power One or SMA
Around $13,000 (or ~$4.33 / watt).
Note: This company was pleasant to speak to. However, they were upfront that they couldn't meet or beat the $4 threshold. So I didn't get an exact quote since I don't want to waste their time.
I also made an Excel sheet to see if DR-SES rate structure (Time of Use for Solar System) would save me money. As expected, DR-SES doesn't make sense for winter month when compared with the regular DR tier rate. It would cost somewhere between $5 to $10 more w/ DR-SES than just plain DR.
However, summer month not only reverses the trend (as expected), but by a large margin! Instead of SDG&E owing me $10 dollar for say July on DR, DR-SES calculation says July should be negative $75! I guess SDG&E's $0.45 / kWh summer peak rate makes a huge difference. The extra credit during summer could potentially offset overall winter costs. So instead of being short of 1000kWh per year, the total cost could be a net zero.
The cynic in me says SDG&E would alleviate this disparity quickly.
I'd suggest not placing a whole lot of confidence in future bills with T.O.U. pricing. Not because you're off, but rather, that it's often and usually harder to get everyone to remember to keep stuff off during peak/semi peak hrs. Nice in theory, tough in practice, thus harder to accurately predict. Most residential SDG & E is not on T.O.U. at this time, probably because most are unaware of it.Leave a comment:
Copyright © 2014 SolarReviews All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.1.3
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 10:28 AM.
Leave a comment: