Full roof coverage with real + imitation panels

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by SunEagle

    I bet some of those folks fall into the "I don't like white picket fences" catagory.
    Probably.

    Opinions are like noses. Among other attributes, and like some other body parts, most everyone has one, they mostly all smell most of the time, and they all get stuck in other people's business 1X/a while.

    Leave a comment:


  • SunEagle
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    Beauty is in the eye.
    If you liked "2001 - A Space Odyssey", PV panels and arrays can be beautiful.
    40 years ago, a black slab that took up 2/3 of a roof section would most likely have been an eyesore to a lot of folks.
    Some folks still think so - as ~ 10 % of the folks in my HOA will agree.
    I bet some of those folks fall into the "I don't like white picket fences" catagory.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by solarix
    Since when do roofs look "beautiful"? Most roofs have a bunch of ugly things like vents, flues, stacks, antennas, skylights etc sticking out of them. Everyone is used to those with no complaints, but Oh - put a solar panel on the roof and its a different story.
    Solar panels are beautiful...
    Beauty is in the eye.
    If you liked "2001 - A Space Odyssey", PV panels and arrays can be beautiful.
    40 years ago, a black slab that took up 2/3 of a roof section would most likely have been an eyesore to a lot of folks.
    Some folks still think so - as ~ 10 % of the folks in my HOA will agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • solarix
    replied
    Since when do roofs look "beautiful"? Most roofs have a bunch of ugly things like vents, flues, stacks, antennas, skylights etc sticking out of them. Everyone is used to those with no complaints, but Oh - put a solar panel on the roof and its a different story.
    Solar panels are beautiful...

    Leave a comment:


  • HarryC
    replied
    Flisom have lightweight panels. I'm not sure how much they would charge though.

    Leave a comment:


  • bob-n
    replied
    I'm not an expert on roofing, and I'm not discarding the idea of a universal roofing material, but I suspect we're many years away from having it, in high volume, with enough history to give consumers confidence in it. Tesla has a first pass, but there's a lot of compromises, starting with cost, and very little history.

    We have a lot of engineering and history on various types of roofing, and have settled on a few as economical, effective, maintainable, safe for walking, and enduring for sloped residential roofing: predominantly asphalt, with some metal and tile. There are other materials, like EDP rubber, but these are mostly commercial.

    Likewise, we have some history on the most economical and efficient solar panels: silicon cells with glass top protection, aluminum frames and other layers below and around to mitigate temperature change, handling, and moisture. We made a lot of compromises to get these panels: such as relatively fragile and thin glass so that it will transmit a lot of light and wear well in rain and blown sand. We also developed the infrastructure to manufacture, distribute, and mount these panels.

    If we were to develop a roofing that was everything above rolled into one: economical, effective for roofing, maintainable, walkable, enduring, good at transmitting light, able to hold silicon wafers without thermal problems, able to protect the silicon and conductors from moisture, long life, etc, we would probably be facing an over-constrained system which does some things well, but sacrifices others.

    Don't forget that everything we have today in high volume production had problems in the past when first produced, and sometimes again when a new formulation or material was tried. It took years for some of these issues to appear, and then more time for engineers to solve them and prove them.

    Please work on this. I wish you great luck and speed. But I'm not holding my breath for a good solution in the first half of this decade.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSun
    replied
    And the perfect roof would be a high strength fiberglass or carbon fiber composite monolithic structure, with solar panels contemplated from the design phase. That way they could be seamlessly integrated, perhaps with a novel attachment system. I mean the kind of roof a company like Holland Composites would design. Strangely, fiberglass is still very expensive after all these decades, and this kind of roof would cost a fortune for a house at the moment. We need this kind of technology to scale to high volume prefab.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSun
    replied
    Originally posted by PugPower
    That would create a immense weight load on your roof. Does not seem practical to me.
    This would be engineered for it, new build. We want a steel moment frame, and then a steel framed roof designed for whatever weight it needed to support.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSun
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    One thing to consider is fire code in many areas requires a clear unrestricted access to the ridge line and access to a strip along the ridge line. I do not know how an integrated solar roof deal with it. As Ampster points out the tiles are not the waterproof barrier. If you could work around the fire code issue and you did come up with full coverage solar panels, they would act as a UV barrier for an underlying resilient water proof barrier., like high temp butyl ice and water shield My guess is PV panel glass is tempered for strength and therefore cannot be cut easily. Possibly you could build dummy panels using frame material.
    Good point about fire codes. I wonder how the solar tiles deal with it. I assumed panels could be walked on, which may have been mistaken. I've been reading so much about how they withstand huge hail, hurricanes, etc. that I came away with the impression of indestructibility. And then Tesla's tiles are supposed to last forever or the life of the home, or "whichever comes first" according to Musk...

    It sounds like this would have to be an engineered solution, something standardized and mass produced. In principle, it seems like we're ready to make the jump to full coverage roofs that replace tile and shingles, but the panels might need to be ruggedized further.

    I assume that the panels would provide the same mechanical features of tile and shingles -- sunlight/UV shielding, impact resistance, shielding from gross water flow and impact. The waterproofing would be in the underlayment, felt, self adhesive membranes, or what have you.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    One thing to consider is fire code in many areas requires a clear unrestricted access to the ridge line and access to a strip along the ridge line. I do not know how an integrated solar roof deal with it. As Ampster points out the tiles are not the waterproof barrier. If you could work around the fire code issue and you did come up with full coverage solar panels, they would act as a UV barrier for an underlying resilient water proof barrier., like high temp butyl ice and water shield My guess is PV panel glass is tempered for strength and therefore cannot be cut easily. Possibly you could build dummy panels using frame material.
    There's always BIPV (Building Integrated PV), but those systems don't usually cover an entire roof section and they can usually cost a fair amount more than conventional PV.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Aside from the need to address the fire code issue, which is probably the biggest issue, there is a recent thread that discussed walking on or adding weight to a solar panel and how it's not a good idea from a safety or warranty standpoint. Don't walk, sit or such stuff on a panel. The way they're currently constructed, it won't come to a good end.
    Also, what happens when you need to service a panel in the middle of an array or even get on/at the roof ? Also, good luck on chasing a leak.
    There was a also a thread a couple of yrs. ago about faux panels as a way around some HOA that was concerned about appearances. By the time the fakes got made, it became costly, particularly when it's realized that all the external loadings and so the supports probably need to be considered for the fakes in the same manner as for the real panels.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    One thing to consider is fire code in many areas requires a clear unrestricted access to the ridge line and access to a strip along the ridge line. I do not know how an integrated solar roof deal with it. .
    Good point. I think the Tesla roof can be walked on. If not the solar part, I do think the glass faux panels can be walked on and trimmed to go around obstructions and to fit the edges.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    Originally posted by PugPower
    That would create a immense weight load on your roof. Does not seem practical to me.
    It probably depends on the roof. Most recent roofs have a design load that usually accommodates solar panels.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    Originally posted by PugPower
    That would create a immense weight load on your roof. Does not seem practical to me.
    It probably depends on the roof. Most recent roofs have a design load that usually accommodates solar panels.

    Leave a comment:


  • PugPower
    replied
    That would create a immense weight load on your roof. Does not seem practical to me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...