I dunno, "1/4 or more energy" might be overstating it.
It all comes down to cost. A small change in cost of non-bifacial panels vs. bifacial panels could tilt the decision.
Try our solar cost and savings calculator
Hyper X panels
Collapse
X
-
Good luck. Please consider taking pictures and collecting data, and posting an update to let us know how it goes.Leave a comment:
-
Careful there, that sounds rather perpetual-motiony.
You might be interested in http://www.prismsolar.com/pdf/Design_guide.pdf, which gives some tips on predicting the backside boost when e.g. mounted above concrete (a fairly reflective substance).Leave a comment:
-
What my intentions would be is to install a reflective/mirrored material underneath the array, oversizing a small amount in all directions. That should reflect the same amount of light that passes through the panels, therefore the maximum of the engineered capacity from the backside would be achieved. This install could/would work on any type install, but better efficiencies/consumption will be acquired with the reflective material below the panel at least 2 feet allowing for degree variations perpendicular to the direct sunlight, meaning a ground mount system would allow the opportunity to gather more light to reflect or a system standing off a roof as opposed to a close install. I would like to try a walk under array system with suspended grid ceiling system like in 99% of commercial/retail buildings with mirrored lay in 2x4 tiles.That would in my belief give you as much pass through light as can be reflected by this design. Otherwise the only other way I can imagine to add that much light would be a array high off the ground with reflective array out away from panel array to reflect direct sunlight to the underside of the panel array, this reflective array would have to follow the sun as well as the panel array itself. Or one could install LED lights underneath the panel array to boost light output, at the risk of losing what you have just gained.Leave a comment:
-
You might be interested in http://www.prismsolar.com/pdf/Design_guide.pdf, which gives some tips on predicting the backside boost when e.g. mounted above concrete (a fairly reflective substance).Leave a comment:
-
Reflection
What my intentions would be is to install a reflective/mirrored material underneath the array, oversizing a small amount in all directions. That should reflect the same amount of light that passes through the panels, therefore the maximum of the engineered capacity from the backside would be achieved. This install could/would work on any type install, but better efficiencies/consumption will be acquired with the reflective material below the panel at least 2 feet allowing for degree variations perpendicular to the direct sunlight, meaning a ground mount system would allow the opportunity to gather more light to reflect or a system standing off a roof as opposed to a close install. I would like to try a walk under array system with suspended grid ceiling system like in 99% of commercial/retail buildings with mirrored lay in 2x4 tiles.That would in my belief give you as much pass through light as can be reflected by this design. Otherwise the only other way I can imagine to add that much light would be a array high off the ground with reflective array out away from panel array to reflect direct sunlight to the underside of the panel array, this reflective array would have to follow the sun as well as the panel array itself. Or one could install LED lights underneath the panel array to boost light output, at the risk of losing what you have just gained.Leave a comment:
-
SensiJ, wouldn't the SolarEdge 135% allowable DC/AC ratio mean that the solaredge could do more with the reflected light? As I ask that, i think that both systems would be maxed out on that anways... you'd actually have to design to a smaller power ratio because you know that "surplus" is coming.
I'm not sure you'd have to design to a smaller power ratio though... it kind of depends on how you are using the backside. If it is to pick up extra light in either the morning or evening on an E or W facing array, it probably won't make much difference. If it is a south facing array with some structural reflection to pick up light from the north side, maybe it would matter more.Leave a comment:
-
SensiJ, wouldn't the SolarEdge 135% allowable DC/AC ratio mean that the solaredge could do more with the reflected light? As I ask that, i think that both systems would be maxed out on that anways... you'd actually have to design to a smaller power ratio because you know that "surplus" is coming.
Which brings up the follow-through - Are those panels rated to include that back side reflective quality, or are they rated top-side only?
Anyone have thoughts?Leave a comment:
-
I doubt very much that adding a white layer underneath flush mounted bifacial panels will provide a worthwhile boost.
That claimed 20% booat is only possible if mounted so their back sides can see some sky or at least well-lit snow.
See
Leave a comment:
-
Has anyone had/have any experience with the Sunpreme bifacial frameless panels and the Solar edge inverter? If what I read is correct, that is the way to go, you can install reflective material underneath and increase harvest by 22% or more! And the Solar edge inverter is the highest rated on the market and will help increase harvest over Enphase Microinverters. Someone please wake me up and bring me back into the world....
I am unaware of how SolarEdge would consistently outproduce Enphase. Installations can be set up to slightly favor one or the other, but fundamentally, the key to both relative to a string inverter is individual panel MPPT.Leave a comment:
-
Hyper X panels
Has anyone had/have any experience with the Sunpreme bifacial frameless panels and the Solar edge inverter? If what I read is correct, that is the way to go, you can install reflective material underneath and increase harvest by 22% or more! And the Solar edge inverter is the highest rated on the market and will help increase harvest over Enphase Microinverters. Someone please wake me up and bring me back into the world....
Copyright © 2014 SolarReviews All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.1.0
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 11:48 PM.
Leave a comment: