Hyper X panels

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DanKegel
    replied
    Originally posted by glennestanford
    if I could afford a system I would definitely add a reflective material, why invest 20k in a system and not do it for more energy for the life of the system or reflective system when you could invest most likely less that 1k for a system for 1/4 or more energy?
    I dunno, "1/4 or more energy" might be overstating it.

    It all comes down to cost. A small change in cost of non-bifacial panels vs. bifacial panels could tilt the decision.

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    Good luck. Please consider taking pictures and collecting data, and posting an update to let us know how it goes.

    Leave a comment:


  • glennestanford
    replied
    Originally posted by DanKegel
    Careful there, that sounds rather perpetual-motiony.

    You might be interested in http://www.prismsolar.com/pdf/Design_guide.pdf, which gives some tips on predicting the backside boost when e.g. mounted above concrete (a fairly reflective substance).
    Thanks, Some very good info, looks very promising to me, enough so if I could afford a system I would definitely add a reflective material, why invest 20k in a system and not do it for more energy for the life of the system or reflective system when you could invest most likely less that 1k for a system for 1/4 or more energy? I would build a passive tracker and attach the reflective system rigid below it to have reflection all day, with 4 season manual adjustment.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by glennestanford
    What my intentions would be is to install a reflective/mirrored material underneath the array, oversizing a small amount in all directions. That should reflect the same amount of light that passes through the panels, therefore the maximum of the engineered capacity from the backside would be achieved. This install could/would work on any type install, but better efficiencies/consumption will be acquired with the reflective material below the panel at least 2 feet allowing for degree variations perpendicular to the direct sunlight, meaning a ground mount system would allow the opportunity to gather more light to reflect or a system standing off a roof as opposed to a close install. I would like to try a walk under array system with suspended grid ceiling system like in 99% of commercial/retail buildings with mirrored lay in 2x4 tiles.That would in my belief give you as much pass through light as can be reflected by this design. Otherwise the only other way I can imagine to add that much light would be a array high off the ground with reflective array out away from panel array to reflect direct sunlight to the underside of the panel array, this reflective array would have to follow the sun as well as the panel array itself. Or one could install LED lights underneath the panel array to boost light output, at the risk of losing what you have just gained.
    The cost and complexity of what you describe with reflective surfaces make it impractical and cost ineffective by any means I can imagine. The LED thing is a non starter.

    Leave a comment:


  • DanKegel
    replied
    Originally posted by glennestanford
    Or one could install LED lights underneath the panel array to boost light output, at the risk of losing what you have just gained.
    Careful there, that sounds rather perpetual-motiony.

    You might be interested in http://www.prismsolar.com/pdf/Design_guide.pdf, which gives some tips on predicting the backside boost when e.g. mounted above concrete (a fairly reflective substance).

    Leave a comment:


  • glennestanford
    replied
    Reflection

    What my intentions would be is to install a reflective/mirrored material underneath the array, oversizing a small amount in all directions. That should reflect the same amount of light that passes through the panels, therefore the maximum of the engineered capacity from the backside would be achieved. This install could/would work on any type install, but better efficiencies/consumption will be acquired with the reflective material below the panel at least 2 feet allowing for degree variations perpendicular to the direct sunlight, meaning a ground mount system would allow the opportunity to gather more light to reflect or a system standing off a roof as opposed to a close install. I would like to try a walk under array system with suspended grid ceiling system like in 99% of commercial/retail buildings with mirrored lay in 2x4 tiles.That would in my belief give you as much pass through light as can be reflected by this design. Otherwise the only other way I can imagine to add that much light would be a array high off the ground with reflective array out away from panel array to reflect direct sunlight to the underside of the panel array, this reflective array would have to follow the sun as well as the panel array itself. Or one could install LED lights underneath the panel array to boost light output, at the risk of losing what you have just gained.

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    Originally posted by Rocksteady2R
    SensiJ, wouldn't the SolarEdge 135% allowable DC/AC ratio mean that the solaredge could do more with the reflected light? As I ask that, i think that both systems would be maxed out on that anways... you'd actually have to design to a smaller power ratio because you know that "surplus" is coming.
    The DC-AC size ratio SolarEdge is generally the same as any other inverter. You can put more DC on the inverter, but it doesn't mean you'll increase your peak AC output. Increasing the DC will proportionally increase the output for all times in which the peak output limit of the inverter is not being reached.

    I'm not sure you'd have to design to a smaller power ratio though... it kind of depends on how you are using the backside. If it is to pick up extra light in either the morning or evening on an E or W facing array, it probably won't make much difference. If it is a south facing array with some structural reflection to pick up light from the north side, maybe it would matter more.

    Leave a comment:


  • DanKegel
    replied
    Here's the datasheet for their 60 cell panel:


    As you can see, it is primarily rated for zero backside boost,
    but also includes some data for 10% and 20% backside boost.
    But it also cautions that flush mounted panels will see little to no backside boost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rocksteady2R
    replied
    SensiJ, wouldn't the SolarEdge 135% allowable DC/AC ratio mean that the solaredge could do more with the reflected light? As I ask that, i think that both systems would be maxed out on that anways... you'd actually have to design to a smaller power ratio because you know that "surplus" is coming.

    Which brings up the follow-through - Are those panels rated to include that back side reflective quality, or are they rated top-side only?

    Anyone have thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • DanKegel
    replied
    I doubt very much that adding a white layer underneath flush mounted bifacial panels will provide a worthwhile boost.

    That claimed 20% booat is only possible if mounted so their back sides can see some sky or at least well-lit snow.

    See

    Leave a comment:


  • sensij
    replied
    Originally posted by glennestanford
    Has anyone had/have any experience with the Sunpreme bifacial frameless panels and the Solar edge inverter? If what I read is correct, that is the way to go, you can install reflective material underneath and increase harvest by 22% or more! And the Solar edge inverter is the highest rated on the market and will help increase harvest over Enphase Microinverters. Someone please wake me up and bring me back into the world....
    There have been a few threads this year where these have been discussed. Increasing harvest is possible, but your array needs to be designed for it. Simply putting a reflective surface under a flush mounted array won't get you 22%. DanKegel is actually installing these as a test soon, so we'll have some real-world data to look at.

    I am unaware of how SolarEdge would consistently outproduce Enphase. Installations can be set up to slightly favor one or the other, but fundamentally, the key to both relative to a string inverter is individual panel MPPT.

    Leave a comment:


  • glennestanford
    started a topic Hyper X panels

    Hyper X panels

    Has anyone had/have any experience with the Sunpreme bifacial frameless panels and the Solar edge inverter? If what I read is correct, that is the way to go, you can install reflective material underneath and increase harvest by 22% or more! And the Solar edge inverter is the highest rated on the market and will help increase harvest over Enphase Microinverters. Someone please wake me up and bring me back into the world....
Working...