The 100A service has to be upgraded to support the barn, anyway. So, that's getting swapped up to 200A, regardless of what else happens.
Unfortunately, there don't seem to be many pros around. Most solar installers are just doing plug-and-play stuff, and don't seem to know anything about how it works.
Try our solar cost and savings calculator
Feeding a sub-panel
Collapse
X
-
You have other issues like the 100 amp service to the house
I would suggest contacting a pro in your area that can actually see what you have and is aware of the local codes and restrictions.
From here it is only a guessLeave a comment:
-
NH has "group net metering," as they call it. You can even have a dedicated feed-in meter for the array, and other members pulling out power (some folks apparently do that if they have a field that is not near enough to their house for direct wiring).
But it's done in dollars, not kWh. And, as noted, they've recently cut the rate they will pay for power. Even spending some more money for wiring right now will pay for itself fairly quickly when it gets that power sold at twice the price by offsetting house usage rather than selling it to the grid.
The power company won't discuss disconnects. They don't require them on systems below 10kW, and when I asked them for what they wanted so I could plan for the future, they told me that they can't give information unless they have an application for the system that requires it. Which is ridiculous, but I think they're not pleased with the number of folks who are installing PV, and are trying to make it difficult. I'm assuming that a disconnect located near the meter would be in the plan - if I did a breaker to feed that sub-panel, I was going to run it through an exterior disconnect first, before sending it to the barn (easy enough, as the disconnect would be right on the other side of the wall from the panel).
It sounds like the best plan is to run a dedicated line from the main meter to the barn, right?
Will a 100A line from the meter to the barn be acceptable to connect both the solar and the barn loads, so long as I connect the solar directly to that line rather than through the panel's bus?
And, ignoring the future plans, what's the simplest way to get the 7kW system connected up and working?Leave a comment:
-
Just a heads up, with a large PV install, the inverter may feed enough current, that if it's not consumed locally, you may raise the line voltage enough to trip offline. A panel feeding a panel fed from a tap, may have enough resistance from all the connections and someone skimping on wire size, you get shutdowns. And if there is a long feed from the last transformer on the pole (grid), that resistance all adds up.Leave a comment:
-
Just a heads up, with a large PV install, the inverter may feed enough current, that if it's not consumed locally, you may raise the line voltage enough to trip offline. A panel feeding a panel fed from a tap, may have enough resistance from all the connections and someone skimping on wire size, you get shutdowns. And if there is a long feed from the last transformer on the pole (grid), that resistance all adds up.Leave a comment:
-
New Hampshire does allow virtual net metering.
So the barn would be the host and the house would be secondary.Leave a comment:
-
BTW - multiple subpanels at the barn are a possibility too - but means more wires going to the barn. (more wires = more $ for the wires and question of fitting them in the conduit)Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately, the local power company has cut their payments for produced power by about half. So, the best way to benefit from the power production is to get it to the house where it will directly offset electricity as its used, rather than just sending power into the grid at half the electric rate. The barn does not have enough load to justify the solar installation - the real goal is to have the power sent to the house, where it matters.
I've read of such things before. I think in that case there were rules like the connection had to be to the same section of the grid (which wouldn't be a problem for you).
I don't know if that was a state-specific law or a particular POCO - or what it was exactly. But I'd read up on it and I'd ask the POCO about it.
If that isn't viable, I think you probably need to change your plans for your subpanel.
I think you are saying you have a subpanel with 100A bus, that you're planning to put in 90A of solar breakers. Which by itself I think would be fine there - but you likely need/want multiple 20A circuits there too for lights, tools, etc. etc.
(Connecting it at the house would be another question you'd have to figure out what you'd do)
For the subpanel at the barn, I'd figure out what all the circuits I could possibly want there. Then look at the price difference between a 125A bus and 200A bus panel. And probably use a 200A bus subpanel with a 100A main breaker because it'll be $40 more for the 200A. Then when I realize a month later I really should have put in a 50A breaker for the welder/EV-charger/whatever I won't have to replace the panel.Leave a comment:
-
Solarix, your simple interpretation of the 120% rule is misleading.
The correct statement is that the size of the main breaker plus the amount of the PV backfeed (determined differently before 2014 NEC) cannot be more than 120% of the bus capacity.
Some 200A panels have a 225A bus, giving you 50A to work with.
Or you can reduce the size of the main, say from 200A to 150A if that will still supply your full load, and thus get an additional 50A of backfeed allowance.
And even the 20% of bus capacity does not apply for center fed main panels or if you cannot locate the PV breaker all the way at the far end of the panel bus from the main breaker.Leave a comment:
-
First rule of backfeeding solar into a load-side tap is that the backfeed current may be no more than 20% of the service's busbar size. Even if you upgrade to a 200A panel that is still too small for your future 17kW. Unless you have barn loads that total less than 100A and ensure that no more than that can be added, the subpanel circuit must be limited to no more than 20A of backfeed which is only a 3.8kW inverter. You could put in a new "solar ready" main panel with a 225A busbar - but that is still a maximum 12.5kW inverter - thus a line-side tap is what you are looking at. Could upgrade to a 400A panel and use the 2nd 200A tap just for solar. Keep your barn loads to less than 100A, backfeed a breaker there and upgrade to a 400A main is what I'd do. The other piece of the equation is where does your utility mandate the AC disconnect to be? Usually they want it at the main panel for easy access although they may allow locating elsewhere as long as there is a permanent map at the main service showing where they can find it.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Flint
What state are you in?Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately, the local power company has cut their payments for produced power by about half. So, the best way to benefit from the power production is to get it to the house where it will directly offset electricity as its used, rather than just sending power into the grid at half the electric rate. The barn does not have enough load to justify the solar installation - the real goal is to have the power sent to the house, where it matters.Leave a comment:
-
Have you thought about adding a second meter at the barn? Saves you the 250' of wire, avoids touching the existing panel, and saves maybe 2% line losses on your PV production. So even if it's expensive maybe worth it.Leave a comment:
-
And, just to make sure we're talking about the same thing, by a "line tap," you mean connecting a dedicated breaker below the meter, in parallel with the existing house panel? That would be acceptable from my standpoint. Basically, there would just be two main breakers - one that feeds the house, and one that feeds the barn. Would everything else work in that situation? And would the breaker be a 200A or a 100A unit?
A few suppliers make combination meter sockets with four breaker spaces (for example, GE R281CB1). Could I get one of those and stick two 100A breakers in?Leave a comment:
Copyright © 2014 SolarReviews All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.1.0
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 06:20 AM.
Leave a comment: