Here's a thought. Instead of upping the Ah of the batteries, how about lowering the charge going into the batteries? If I reduce my collecting capacity from ~93V @ 9A down to ~62V @ 9A I lose more in voltage drop as a percentage (roughly 3% vs. 2%), but I'm still at ~60V. As I understand it, that gives me sufficient voltage to maintain charging early/late in the day and suboptimal cloud conditions. It also puts the max charge at roughly 22A down from the previous 34A, which seems to be more inline with what a 105Ah system wants.
Do I have that right? Is the lower amperage sufficient to keep two 105Ah AGMs happy over the 5 day charge period?
What you can see me trying to do here is avoiding an overkill system for what amounts to keeping some beer cold

1. I only have to purchase 2 panels instead of 3, which saves me ~$180
2. I only have to spend ~$250 on a second AGM battery vs. a larger amount on any other battery solution (cost could be 2x or higher)
3. I can knock my controller down from 40A to a 30A, which in the case of Victron is a ~$100 savings
The savings "pay for" the second AGM battery, which isn't a bad thing in my mind.
Of course the downside of this is I am truly sizing my system for a specific use purpose and pattern. Occasional problems, like extended stays with crap weather, can be overcome by the use of my existing 20A generator. However, should I significantly deviate from either what I'm running or how long I'm running it for, then I could run into trouble. I'm OK with running that risk.
Steve
Leave a comment: