Yes, that's where I went, and if you read it you can see that the author has a real valid point - the same one that CA_Tom made.
The mnemonic is misleading - normally mnemonics have each letter be a step in the sequence. ex. "Every good boy deserves fudge" or BBROYGBVGW, or "king paul came over for good sex very fine indeed"
But in this mnemonic it is NOT the case.
That makes it a bad mnemonic.
There is a significant difference between
1> Multiplication
2> Division
3> Addition
4> Subtraction
and
1> Multiplication AND division
2> Addition AND subtraction
They are NOT the same order.
Let's use each of these possible order of operation rules to evaluate
32 / 2 * 8
Under the first set we do all the multiplication first, and then do division.
2 * 8 = 16
32 / 16 = 2
therefore
32 / 2 *8 = 2
Under the second set (the one that is the generally agreed upon "correct" order of operations but is not what you'd expect from the "My Dear Aunt Sally" mnemonic)
we would do:
32 / 2 = 16
16 * 8 = 128
therefore
32 /2 *8 = 128
So under one set of rules, you get 2 and under the other you get 128.
I think this demonstrates that contrary to your assertion, they are not the "exact same" order.
"I make folks go look up the answers for themselves so they actually learn something."
So what were you trying to make me and others learn?
That you learned a bad mnemonic when you were a kid? Or that there exists this bad mnemonic that isn't being used much? Or that you value someone learning a bad mnemonic more than them actually learning the actual information?
The mnemonic is misleading - normally mnemonics have each letter be a step in the sequence. ex. "Every good boy deserves fudge" or BBROYGBVGW, or "king paul came over for good sex very fine indeed"
But in this mnemonic it is NOT the case.
That makes it a bad mnemonic.
There is a significant difference between
1> Multiplication
2> Division
3> Addition
4> Subtraction
and
1> Multiplication AND division
2> Addition AND subtraction
They are NOT the same order.
Let's use each of these possible order of operation rules to evaluate
32 / 2 * 8
Under the first set we do all the multiplication first, and then do division.
2 * 8 = 16
32 / 16 = 2
therefore
32 / 2 *8 = 2
Under the second set (the one that is the generally agreed upon "correct" order of operations but is not what you'd expect from the "My Dear Aunt Sally" mnemonic)
we would do:
32 / 2 = 16
16 * 8 = 128
therefore
32 /2 *8 = 128
So under one set of rules, you get 2 and under the other you get 128.
I think this demonstrates that contrary to your assertion, they are not the "exact same" order.
"I make folks go look up the answers for themselves so they actually learn something."
So what were you trying to make me and others learn?
That you learned a bad mnemonic when you were a kid? Or that there exists this bad mnemonic that isn't being used much? Or that you value someone learning a bad mnemonic more than them actually learning the actual information?
Comment