Most Popular Topics
Collapse
now what :)
Collapse
X
-
-
so let's say $700 all in and that the batteries lasts 8 years ( being generous )
at best it generates 1 kWh a day AC after all losses.
So 2.9 MWh over 8 years assuming zero failures ( modules would degrade and batteries as well over that time but keeping things simple)
then you need new batteries, another $250 to keep it going.
but for 8 years got got 2.9 MWh for $700 or $0.24/KWh (compared to grid cost of for OP of $0.10/kWh)
but if you let it going for another 8 years with the $250 investment in new batteries ( ignoring degradation) that would be 5.8MWh for 16 years at cost of $950
or $0.164/KWh.
but remember those production numbers and battery life are optimistic.
Off grid sucks for financial
Edit: correct math mistake on final pricing.Last edited by ButchDeal; 08-04-2017, 08:33 AM.OutBack FP1 w/ CS6P-250P http://bit.ly/1Sg5VNHComment
-
That's very sad, I always thought that off-grid would be cheaper than being on-grid, since there is so much inefficiency in this country. I guess panels and batteries have not come down in price enough yet..Comment
-
The price of solar hardware and some batteries have gone down in price. The problem is unless you live somewhere that the cost of power is > $0.50/kWh it is almost impossible to justify the cost of being off grid and will be for some time until the price of batteries get low enough that they can deliver power for about $0.25/kWh.Comment
-
Off grid usually also comes with drastic reductions in consumption, due to the drastic increase in production costs.OutBack FP1 w/ CS6P-250P http://bit.ly/1Sg5VNHComment
-
Comment
-
So $500 for 200w solar and 2 batteries plus charge controller, inverter, cables, fuses, battery box, vent pipe.
so let's say $700 all in and that the batteries lasts 8 years ( being generous )
at best it generates 1 kWh a day AC after all losses.
So 2.9 MWh over 8 years assuming zero failures ( modules would degrade and batteries as well over that time but keeping things simple)
then you need new batteries, another $250 to keep it going.
but for 8 years got got 2.9 MWh for $700 or $0.24/KWh (compared to grid cost of for OP of $0.10/kWh)
but if you let it going for another 8 years with the $250 investment in new batteries ( ignoring degradation) that would be 5.8MWh for 16 years at cost of $950
or $0.164/KWh.
but remember those production numbers and battery life are optimistic.
Off grid sucks for financial
Edit: corrected math mistake on final pricing.
.700 kilodollars divided by 2.9MWh equals .241 dollars per kWh.
.950 kilodollars divided by 5.8MWh equals .164 dollars per kWh.
You should have been suspicious of your numbers when twice the energy for less than twice the cost seemed to be more expensive!
You appear to have divided kWh by cost to get a $/kWh figure.
Those number may not make sense in some part of the US, but would be great in Hawaii.
I am, however, still not convinced that all of the costs have been properly accounted for. And 8 years for the battery bank in that service is hopelessly optimistic except for the highest RE grade of FLA battery cared for meticulously.
Last edited by inetdog; 08-04-2017, 03:06 PM.SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.Comment
-
But still not good when an overly optimistic calculation still comes out higher then $.11 per kWh.SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.Comment
-
Lets try the math again, OK?
.700 kilodollars divided by 2.9MWh equals .241 dollars per kWh.
.950 kilodollars divided by 5.8MWh equals .164 dollars per kWh.
You should have been suspicious of your numbers when twice the energy for less than twice the cost seemed to be more expensive!
You appear to have divided kWh by cost to get a $/kWh figure.
Those number may not make sense in some part of the US, but would be great in Hawaii.
I am, however, still not convinced that all of the costs have been properly accounted for. And 8 years for the battery bank in that service is hopelessly optimistic except for the highest RE grade of FLA battery cared for meticulously.
and yes as I stated the production is overly optimistic as well as the battery life.OutBack FP1 w/ CS6P-250P http://bit.ly/1Sg5VNHComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Price has nothing to do with it. You have been brainwashed. The issue with all batteries is EROI. it takes more energy to make a battery than the battery can deliver in its lifetime. In other words just makes you a heavy polluter.MSEE, PEComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Updated the quote so it's correct.Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
|| Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
|| VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A
solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-ListerComment
Comment