You're not that much different from the rest of us, save you're probably less hypocritical about it. It's all about saving money or at least the perception of saving money as public opinion can be manipulated.
I've come to the conclusion that when people do what is truly in their best long term financial interests, the environment is usually helped the most, that is, use less and change lifestyle a bit.
Unfortunately, most folks usually confuse short term gain and short sighted simplistic, non critical and simplistic thinking for long term critical and strategic thinking. So, they get sold a bill of goods that solar will save the planet, climb on the sheeple sola bandwagon and as a result, throw $$'s at self inflicted high electric bills by installing the most expensive way to reduce an electric bill (solar), and then, usually and more ironically, usually wind up using more electricity because the most effective impetus to reduce use (a higher electric bill) has been (perceived) to have been reduced to some degree.
I've come to the conclusion that when people do what is truly in their best long term financial interests, the environment is usually helped the most, that is, use less and change lifestyle a bit.
Unfortunately, most folks usually confuse short term gain and short sighted simplistic, non critical and simplistic thinking for long term critical and strategic thinking. So, they get sold a bill of goods that solar will save the planet, climb on the sheeple sola bandwagon and as a result, throw $$'s at self inflicted high electric bills by installing the most expensive way to reduce an electric bill (solar), and then, usually and more ironically, usually wind up using more electricity because the most effective impetus to reduce use (a higher electric bill) has been (perceived) to have been reduced to some degree.
Comment