I have (x3) 150W panels, and need 1600Wh a day. Suggestions for battery banks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LETitROLL
    Solar Fanatic
    • May 2014
    • 286

    #16
    Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
    I'll be travelling between Washington, Oregon, and California, (3 to 5 peak sun hours a day), and it would be nice to be completely off-grid in Washington during Winter, if possible.
    Going to need a big system to be completly off-grid in most parts of Washington in the winter. There are a few spots that get more sunshine, but the parts of washington I am used to are about in the 2 sun hours a day range in winter, and Cali in the good seasons closer to 5-6, so you will have to nail down where and when you really need it to work before you can really size the system correctly.

    Comment

    • Fractalcathedral
      Member
      • Mar 2015
      • 48

      #17
      Originally posted by LETitROLL
      The advantage of the 24v inverter is that it will draw only 1/2 the amps from the battery. The frige compressor will get the same from the inverter in any of the systems because they all eventually convert it to your 120v AC.
      You mentioned early "the starting point of safety concerns". Could you elaborate on those? I am just curious, I am strongly leaning against 12v battery bank and towards 48v 4-module series with 24v battery bank. but I'm curious to learn the Why of any of this. Could any of these safety concerns be remedied with thicker wires, fuses, breakers or installing a A/C Disconnect?

      Originally posted by LETitROLL
      A watt is a watt, so you are not really doubling your inverter capacity, but the higher voltage inverters are more efficient because it is less of a step up from 24v to 120v then from 12v to 120v, and also again only drawing 1/2 the amps from your battery so less problems with wires, connections, etc.
      Thanks a lot man, I didn't know that. Does anyone has any book recommendations regarding the fine grain details of this stuff? It's pretty fascinating, to be sure, but I feel like all of my research is very fragmented, like that scene in Better Call Saul where Jimmy organizes the scrap of shredded documents.

      Comment

      • LETitROLL
        Solar Fanatic
        • May 2014
        • 286

        #18
        Also remember when factoring in losses they are system wide (and worse at lower voltages), panels rarely produce their rated output, then you lose some of that lesser number getting to the controller, then more losses moving through that circuitry, then you try and put 400w in a battery and lose part of that to heat and more wires and connections, then an hour later to take it back out of the battery and lose more again, then most inexpensive inverters really rob you blind. In your application you would probably be closer to correct figuring a 30-40% ballpark loss clear through from panel to freezer. Not trying to discourage you, people do it, and you can make it work with cheap stuff or good stuff, but it does take a bigger system than most factor in for, and the cheap systems usually have more failures and repair bills, and more frequent battery replacement so it ends up being a case of pay me now or pay me later.

        Comment

        • LETitROLL
          Solar Fanatic
          • May 2014
          • 286

          #19
          Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
          You mentioned early "the starting point of safety concerns". Could you elaborate on those?
          Once you get above a certain amperage (60-90 amps roughly) the risk of bad connections, stressed components, inferior wiring, are all going to increase problems and the risk of fire, and things may be okay when new but can sneak up on you if not well maintained as those parts and connections age. At 24 volts (out of your battery bank) 50 amps you are looking at roughly 1000 watts total power, of course at 12v it will take 100 amps to get the same amount of total power (watts).

          Comment

          • LETitROLL
            Solar Fanatic
            • May 2014
            • 286

            #20
            Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
            Could any of these safety concerns be remedied with thicker wires, fuses, breakers or installing a A/C Disconnect?
            Any proper system regardless of the voltage should have the proper fuses, breakers, disconnect, etc. and when done correctly of course that greatly reduces any risk, but the risk is still naturally greater at higher amps.

            Comment

            • Fractalcathedral
              Member
              • Mar 2015
              • 48

              #21
              Originally posted by LETitROLL
              Going to need a big system to be completly off-grid in most parts of Washington in the winter. There are a few spots that get more sunshine, but the parts of washington I am used to are about in the 2 sun hours a day range in winter, and Cali in the good seasons closer to 5-6, so you will have to nail down where and when you really need it to work before you can really size the system correctly.
              Yeah, I am looking at looking at Eugene first, and then Portland if that doesn't work out. Getting a feel for the city first and not dropping anchor until I know it's the place.

              My sister lives in California and my Dad lives in Washington, so I'll be travelling between them. If I don't feel like cycling too deep into the batteries I can read or go outside. There's really no discouraging me at this point, I appreciate hearing the hard facts. I just don't want to be tied to shore power, nor do I want to be tied to a mortgage or throwing my money away on anything more than "I'll pay you 100 bucks to park here for a month" rent, nor polluting the environment. Solar for me is just a no-brainer.

              Comment

              • LETitROLL
                Solar Fanatic
                • May 2014
                • 286

                #22
                The prices on most panels now are a pretty good deal when you consider the amount of power they can generate over a 40 year lifespan, its the batteries that are the big loser from a financial standpoint, but you will do fine if you adjust for the weather and figure you have a little more on sunny days (and seasons), and less on short cloudy days, etc. Most people living off grid deal with that reality and conserve and adjust when needed. Solar has become much more affordable in the last few years, but the initial costs for a decent size system can still be a sizable investment.

                Comment

                • Sunking
                  Solar Fanatic
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 23301

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
                  Yeah, I am looking at looking at Eugene first, and then Portland if that doesn't work out.
                  You could not pick a worse location for solar. Well Seattle is as bad. It takes 4 watts to do what 1.5 watts will do anywhere else in the USA. It also forces you to use very expensive AGM batteries which cost twice as much and last half as long as Flooded Lead Acid. A battery system there will be 4 times higher than anywhere else.
                  MSEE, PE

                  Comment

                  • LETitROLL
                    Solar Fanatic
                    • May 2014
                    • 286

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Sunking
                    It also forces you to use very expensive AGM batteries
                    So AGM is better in areas of low solar isolation? Do they do better than FLA with charge rates below C/12?

                    Comment

                    • SunEagle
                      Super Moderator
                      • Oct 2012
                      • 15125

                      #25
                      Originally posted by LETitROLL
                      So AGM is better in areas of low solar isolation? Do they do better than FLA with charge rates below C/12?
                      An AGM battery allows you to charge it faster then a FLA battery. So to compensate for low solar isolation you use more panel wattage and shove as much amps into that battery for the short time the sun is shining. Doing that with FLA will boil off the fluid.

                      Comment

                      • Mike90250
                        Moderator
                        • May 2009
                        • 16020

                        #26
                        An AGM battery allows you to charge it faster then a FLA battery. So to compensate for low solar isolation you use more panel wattage and shove as much amps into that battery for the short time the sun is shining. Doing that with FLA will boil off the fluid.
                        or you can leap to the LFP batteries, which can take a hefty charge too, and cost some more $$
                        Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
                        || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
                        || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

                        solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
                        gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

                        Comment

                        • paulcheung
                          Solar Fanatic
                          • Jul 2013
                          • 965

                          #27
                          If you willing to carry a small portable generator (1000 watts) and not afraid to use it, you can just use 2 Rolls S-550 batteries and wire them 12 volts, get a Xantrex Pro watts 1000 inverter and 600 watts panels. I have a similar system that consume about the same amount wattage, I have 675 watts panels and 450 AH 12 volt battery bank. I have to use generator for 2 hours to charge the battery bank any time I got a rainy day. The only problem might be the start current for the freezer, it the Pro watts 1000 can handle it then the rest is ok.

                          Also if you drive a lot, you can install an electronic Battery Isolator to charge the house battery with your alternator.

                          Comment

                          • Sunking
                            Solar Fanatic
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 23301

                            #28
                            Originally posted by LETitROLL
                            So AGM is better in areas of low solar isolation? Do they do better than FLA with charge rates below C/12?
                            Yes to both questions.

                            However in areas of low Solar Insolation like Gloomy Doomy Portland/Eugene where Sun Hours drop to less than 2 hours means you have to have a panel wattage that generates charge currents in excess of C/8, and FLA batteries cannot handle that kind of charge current where AGM can.

                            Example let's say you need 1 Kwh per day in two cities of Portland OR and Dallas TX. Both need the exact same battery capacity of 12 volts at 400 AH.

                            In Dallas the Dec/Jan Insolation of 3.75 Sun Hours only needs a 400 watt solar panel with a 35 amp MPPT controller which at max charge current = roughly 34 amps of a C/11 charge current which if good on a FLA battery.

                            Gloomy Doomy Portland and Eugene OR only gets 1.4 Sun Hours in Dec/Jan and will require a 1100 watt of solar panels using a very expensive Midnite Solar Classic charge controller generating 92 amps of charge current or C/4 charge rate and will require a AGM battery to handle that high current.

                            In Dallas it would cost you roughly $1800 to $2000 with $700 to $800 of that in batteries that last 4 to 5 years. The first 5 years would be roughly $1/Kwh which is a hard slap in the face when power cost less than 10-cents per Kwh in TX.

                            In Portland/Eugene it would cost you roughly $3500 to $3800 of that $1500 to $1600 in batteries that last 2 or 3 years. First 3 years brings your Kwh cost to $$2.10/Kwh which is a wicked slap in the face because you can buy it for less than 11-cents per Kwh from clean renewable hydro dam power in that area. There is nothing clean or green about battery systems. A huge waste of resources and very dirty.
                            MSEE, PE

                            Comment

                            • Fractalcathedral
                              Member
                              • Mar 2015
                              • 48

                              #29
                              Point taken, but the tradeoff seems to be that I don't have to pay rent, or can find ways to make it extremely minimal, don't have to plug into shore power, (which I'm concerned could have a fault and send huge currents back through to my system), and can park in places that are more secluded than your average cramped, $300 a month RV park, and still be able to work on digital art, watch movies, and play PS4 as I please.

                              I found a chart for D.O.D/ cycle lifetime earlier in my research, which looked like this:

                              * 50% = 200 cycles
                              * 40% = 500 cycles
                              * 30% = 1000 cycles
                              * 20% = 2000 cycles
                              * 10% = 4000 cycles

                              And I guess I took it for granted that this chart was applicable to AGM, (which I would be willing to pay for to avoid having to deal with the potential safety hazards of FLA, however manageable they may be with proper knowledge), but I think the article mentioned using a hydrometer, which I am unsure applies to AGM. How would this D.O.D chart look for AGM?

                              I ordered a 4th panel today, and I intend to put them into one 48v series, which eliminates the need for a combiner box. Does it also eliminate the need for a fuse or breaker between the solar panel and charge controller?

                              People mention 12v,24v, and 48v, but I don't often see 36v thrown in there. Is there any contraindication that should prevent me from going 48v panels > charge controller > 36v battery bank > 36v Inverter? Or any advantage to keeping it 24v?

                              Based on that chart, I was thinking 6 AGM 12v 155ah batteries, with two strings of (x3) in parallel. Gives me 11,160 Watt/hours total. 10,000 is a 20% depth of discharge after I adjusted my daily usage to be 2,000 W/h to compensate for 40% loss from module to freezer, so I could have a little buffer for multiple cloudy days.

                              Since the batteries themselves are 12v, what size would the wires have to be? Those rated for 12v? or can they be suited for the 36v, since that what each string of batteries will, in effect, combine to form? Once again, is there any links or books anyone can refer me which might provide any pertinent information about any of this?

                              Comment

                              • Sunking
                                Solar Fanatic
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 23301

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Fractalcathedral

                                I found a chart for D.O.D/ cycle lifetime earlier in my research, which looked like this:

                                * 50% = 200 cycles
                                * 40% = 500 cycles
                                * 30% = 1000 cycles
                                * 20% = 2000 cycles
                                * 10% = 4000 cycles

                                And I guess I took it for granted that this chart was applicable to AGM, (which I would be willing to pay for to avoid having to deal with the potential safety hazards of FLA, however manageable they may be with proper knowledge), but I think the article mentioned using a hydrometer, which I am unsure applies to AGM. How would this D.O.D chart look for AGM?
                                The chart is generic to low and mid end FLA batteries. Some of the better ones are 5 times that amount. However all charts are grossly over exaggerated. Batteries have both Calendar and Cycle Life, whichever comes first. You can determine Calendar life looking at the warranty.

                                Manufactures spin the numbers and test under lab conditions. Yes they can get 2000 cycles at 20% DOD, but that is done in less than a year, in a lab with computer controlled equipment, on a 2 year battery. In your real 2 years is maybe 600 cycles before Calendar Life hits the end. There are a very few batteries out there that have 10 year warranties like Rolls 5000 Series, but you are going to pay $250 to $300 per Kwh for them vs $75/Kwh for a 1 year battery. However long term the high-end is less expensive.

                                Now there are 10 year AGM batteries out there. They come under the Marketing names as Fork Lift, Traction, and Industrial batteries but come with a stiff price tag of $400 to $500 per Kwh.

                                If I were in your shoes I would be looking at LiFeP04 aka LFP batteries in a mobile application. They do not have any meaningful Peukert Effect, can be charged discharged at rates of in excess of 1C. It takes 100 AH of LFP to equal 200 AH of FLA to DOD 0f 80%. In practice if you assume only 33% DOD per Day with FLA it only takes 40 AH of LFP top equal 100 AH of FLA.
                                Today Chi-Com LFP batteries sell for 420/Kwh. A set of 4 Calb 100 AH cells (12 volts) will cost 4 cells x $133 each = roughly $540. That roughly equals a 12 volt 250 AH FLA battery which will cost you as little as $225 for a 1 year model up to $750 for a good 6 to 8 year FLA. A LFP battery should give you 1800 to 2500 real cycles, and they do not need to be charged every day like FLA. In fact you never fully charge them up.

                                However IMO you are not a candidate for LFP batteries. You just simple do not know enough yet about them. Just one silly mistake, over discharge, will turn them into boat anchors. Perhaps you rnext set you migh tbe ready for them and hopefully more charge controllers on the market to support them.

                                Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
                                I ordered a 4th panel today, and I intend to put them into one 48v series, which eliminates the need for a combiner box. Does it also eliminate the need for a fuse or breaker between the solar panel and charge controller?
                                Yes but it requires you to use a MPPT controller. Be aware there are a lot of controllers out there that claim to be MPPT, but they are not. You want somewthing that can input 150 Voc

                                Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
                                People mention 12v,24v, and 48v, but I don't often see 36v thrown in there. Is there any contraindication that should prevent me from going 48v panels > charge controller > 36v battery bank > 36v Inverter? Or any advantage to keeping it 24v?
                                Try finding and pricing out a 36 volt Inverter and you will understand. If you should find one in the power you require will be very expensive compared to its 12/24/48 cousin.

                                Originally posted by Fractalcathedral
                                Based on that chart, I was thinking 6 AGM 12v 155ah batteries, with two strings of (x3) in parallel. Gives me 11,160 Watt/hours total. 10,000 is a 20% depth of discharge after I adjusted my daily usage to be 2,000 W/h to compensate for 40% loss from module to freezer, so I could have a little buffer for multiple cloudy days.

                                Since the batteries themselves are 12v, what size would the wires have to be? Those rated for 12v? or can they be suited for the 36v, since that what each string of batteries will, in effect, combine to form? Once again, is there any links or books anyone can refer me which might provide any pertinent information about any of this?
                                OK don't do this and get out of that 12 Volt Box you are stuck in. If you need 465 AH battery, then buy 465 AH batteries. DO NOT PARALLEL BATTERIES unless you have no choice. Unless you need more than 4000 AH, there is no reason to have parallel batteries. 465 AH batteries are are going to be either 6, 4, or 2 volt batteries.

                                However how do you intend to charge such a monster 24 volt 465 AH battery? It will take at least 1100 watts of panels with a 45 amp controller to feed that monster. Not to mention weigh in around 700 pounds.

                                Last comment invest in a Electronic Battery Isolator for $50 to $75. If you run the engine everyday for an hour would completely eliminate the need for any solar. In addition could cut your battery size by 50%. You would only need three day reserve capacity and not 5. Did that occur to you?
                                MSEE, PE

                                Comment

                                Working...